Modulation of sensory nerve fiber excitability by transcutaneous cathodal direct current stimulation

被引:3
|
作者
Caetano, Andre [1 ,2 ]
Pereira, Pedro [3 ]
Pereira, Mariana [1 ]
de Carvalho, Mamede [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Fac Med, Inst Med Mol, Inst Fisiol, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Ctr Hosp Lisboa Ocidental, Hosp Egas Moniz, Dept Neurol, Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Hosp Garcia Orta, Dept Neurol, Almada, Portugal
[4] Ctr Hosp Lisboa Norte, Hosp Santa Maria, Dept Neurosci, Lisbon, Portugal
来源
关键词
Cathodal current; Direct current stimulation; Nerve excitability; Threshold tracking; Sensory nerves;
D O I
10.1016/j.neucli.2019.10.001
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. To assess the lasting effects on sensory nerve membrane excitability of transcutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation with cathodal direct currents (pDCS). Methods. We performed pDCS in 10 healthy subjects with the active electrode placed over the distal right forearm and the reference electrode on the back of the right hand. We used 5 x 5 cm rubber electrodes and the current applied was 2.5 mA during 15 min. Three pDCS sessions were performed on the same day: first, a baseline stimulation was performed, followed by a sham stimulation and lastly a cathodal stimulation. Median sensory nerve excitability measurements were performed at baseline and immediately after each pDCS session using the TRONDNF nerve excitability protocol of the QTRAC program (measurement on the second finger). Results. The protocol was completed and well tolerated in all subjects. RRP (relative refractory period) and refractoriness at 2.5ms were significantly different across the three study conditions, with a significant increase of RRP immediately following cathodal stimulation compared with baseline assessment (mean 4.2 versus 5.3, P=0.002). Other measurements were not modulated by the intervention. Sham-stimulation did not change axonal excitability. Conclusions. Cathodal pDCS stimulation increased RRP of sensory fibers, but no other consistent long-lasting effect was observed. This finding might suggest a reduction of sensory fiber excitability induced by cathodal pDCS. (C) 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 390
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of Anodal and Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on DLPFC on Modulation of Inhibitory Control in ADHD
    Soltaninejad, Zahra
    Nejati, Vahid
    Ekhtiari, Hamed
    JOURNAL OF ATTENTION DISORDERS, 2019, 23 (04) : 325 - 332
  • [22] The effect of combined transcranial direct current stimulation and peripheral nerve electrical stimulation on corticospinal excitability
    Tsuiki, Shota
    Sasaki, Ryoki
    Miyaguchi, Shota
    Kojima, Sho
    Saito, Kei
    Inukai, Yasuto
    Masaki, Mitsuhiro
    Otsuru, Naofumi
    Onishi, Hideaki
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (03):
  • [23] Modulation of Cerebellar Excitability by Polarity-Specific Noninvasive Direct Current Stimulation
    Galea, Joseph M.
    Jayaram, Gowri
    Ajagbe, Loni
    Celnik, Pablo
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 29 (28): : 9115 - 9122
  • [24] Non-synaptic mechanisms underlie the after-effects of cathodal transcutaneous direct current stimulation of the human brain
    Ardolino, G
    Bossi, B
    Barbieri, S
    Priori, A
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2005, 568 (02): : 653 - 663
  • [25] Differential Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability by Different Current Densities of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Bastani, Andisheh
    Jaberzadeh, Shapour
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (08):
  • [26] Does Cathodal Preconditioning Enhance the Effects of Subsequent Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Corticospinal Excitability and Grip Strength?
    Lewis, Aidan
    Rattray, Ben
    Flood, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2025, 39 (01) : e1 - e12
  • [27] Safety limits of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in rats
    Liebetanz, David
    Koch, Reinhard
    Mayenfels, Susanne
    Koenig, Fatima
    Paulus, Walter
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 120 (06) : 1161 - 1167
  • [28] The effect of transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability in chronic incomplete spinal cord injury
    Powell, Elizabeth Salmon
    Carrico, Cheryl
    Salyers, Emily
    Westgate, Philip M.
    Sawaki, Lumy
    NEUROREHABILITATION, 2018, 43 (02) : 125 - 134
  • [29] Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Rasmussen Encephalitis
    Bangel, Katrin A.
    Pang, Ki
    Baker, Mark R.
    NEUROLOGY, 2023, 100 (10) : 484 - 485
  • [30] CATHODAL TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION: FACILITATORY, INHIBITORY, OR BOTH?
    Nozari, Nazbanou
    Woodard, Kristina
    Thompson-Schill, Sharon
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, : 174 - 174