Survival benefits from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy in oesophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis

被引:950
|
作者
Gebski, Val
Burmeister, Bryan
Smithers, B. Mark
Foo, Kerwyn
Zalcberg, John
Simes, John
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Natl Hlth & MRC Clin Trials Ctr, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hosp, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
LANCET ONCOLOGY | 2007年 / 8卷 / 03期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70039-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Resectable oesophageal cancer is often treated with surgery alone or with preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy. We aimed to clarify the benefits of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy versus surgery alone by a meta-analysis of randomised trial data. Methods Eligible trials were identified first from earlier published meta-analyses and systematic reviews. We also used MEDLINE, Cancerlit, and EMBASE databases to identify additional studies and published abstracts from major scientific meetings since 1980. Only randomised studies with an analysis by an intention-to-treat principle were included, and searches were restricted to those databases citing articles in English. We used published hazard ratios if available or estimates from other survival data or survival curves. Treatment effects by type of tumour and treatment sequencing were also investigated. Findings Ten randomised comparisons of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus surgery alone (n=1209) and eight of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus surgery alone (n=1724) in patients with local operable oesophageal carcinoma were identified. The hazard ratio for all-cause mortality with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus surgery alone was 0.81 (95% CI 0.70-0.93; p=0.002), corresponding to a 13% absolute difference in survival at 2 years, with similar results for different histological tumour types: 0.84 (0.71-0.99; p=0.04) for squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC), and 0.75 (0.59-0.95; p=0.02) for adenocarcinoma. The hazard ratio for neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 0.90 (0.81-1.00; p=0.05), which indicates a 2-year absolute survival benefit of 7%. There was no significant effect on all-cause mortality of chemotherapy for patients with SCC (hazard ratio 0.88 [0.75-1.03]; p=0.12), although there was a significant benefit for those with adenocarcinoma (0.78 [0.64-0.95]; p=0.014). Interpretation A significant survival benefit was evident for preoperative chemoradiotherapy and, to a lesser extent, for chemotherapy in patients with adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus. The findings provide an evidence-based framework for the use of neoadjuvant treatment in management decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 234
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable gastric cancer: A meta-analysis
    Chen, Jiuzhou
    Guo, Yaru
    Fang, Miao
    Yuan, Yan
    Zhu, Youqi
    Xin, Yong
    Zhang, Longzhen
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [42] Stage-for-stage comparison of definitive chemoradiotherapy, surgery alone and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for oesophageal carcinoma
    Morgan, M. A.
    Lewis, W. G.
    Casbard, A.
    Roberts, S. A.
    Adams, R.
    Clark, G. W. B.
    Havard, T. J.
    Crosby, T. D. L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 96 (11) : 1300 - 1307
  • [43] Effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Csontos, Armand
    Fazekas, Aliz
    Szako, Lajos
    Farkas, Nelli
    Papp, Csenge
    Ferenczi, Szilard
    Bellyei, Szabolcs
    Hegyi, Peter
    Papp, Andras
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 30 (11) : 1621 - 1635
  • [44] Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer:: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fiorica, F
    Di Bona, D
    Schepis, F
    Licata, A
    Shahied, L
    Venturi, A
    Falchi, AM
    Craxí, A
    Cammà, C
    GUT, 2004, 53 (07) : 925 - 930
  • [45] Reoperative chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Demeester, SR
    GUT, 2005, 54 (03) : 440 - 441
  • [46] Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on breast cancer survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pathak, M.
    Deo, S. V. S.
    Dwivedi, S. N.
    Sreenivas, V.
    Thakur, B.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 72 : S42 - S43
  • [47] Comparison of outcomes between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer: A network meta-analysis
    Fan, Ningbo
    Wang, Zhefang
    Zhou, Chenghui
    Bludau, Marc
    Contino, Gianmarco
    Zhao, Yue
    Bruns, Christiane
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2021, 42
  • [48] A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Survival and Surgical Outcomes Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer
    Laurence, Jerome Martin
    Peter Duy Tran
    Morarji, Kavita
    Eslick, Guy D.
    Vincent Wai To Lam
    Sandroussi, Charbel
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2011, 15 (11) : 2059 - 2069
  • [49] A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Survival and Surgical Outcomes Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer
    Jerome Martin Laurence
    Peter Duy Tran
    Kavita Morarji
    Guy D. Eslick
    Vincent Wai To Lam
    Charbel Sandroussi
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2011, 15 : 2059 - 2069
  • [50] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Winquist, E
    Kirchner, TS
    Segal, R
    Chin, J
    Lukka, H
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (02): : 561 - 569