Challenges of an Integrative and Personalised Health Care for Health Economics and the Insurance System

被引:0
|
作者
Schoch, G. -G. [1 ]
Wuerdemann, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Techniker Krankenkasse, Fachbereich Arzneimittel, D-22305 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
personalised medicine; stratifying medicine; statutory health insurance; biomarkers;
D O I
10.1055/s-0034-1390408
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: Stratifying medicine is a topic of increasing importance in the public health system. There are several questions related to stratifying medicine. This paper reconsiders definitions, opportunities and risks related to stratifying medicine as well as the main challenges of stratifying medicine from the perspective of a public health insurance. Definition: The application of the term and the definition are important points to discuss. Terms such as stratified medicine, personalised medicine or individualised medicine are used. The Techniker Krankenkasse prefers stratifying medicine, because it usually means a medicine that tailors therapy to specific groups of patients by biomarkers. Opportunities and Risks: Stratifying medicine is associated with various hopes, e.g., the avoidance of ineffective therapies and early detection of diseases. But stratifying medicine also carries risks, such as an increase in the number of cases by treatment of disease risks, a duty for health and the weakening of the criteria of evidence-based medicine. Challenges: The complexity of stratifying medicine is a big challenge for all involved parties in the health system. A lot of interrelations are still not completely understood. So the statutory health insurance faces the challenge of making innovative therapy concepts accessible in a timely manner to all insured on the one hand but on the other hand also to protect the community from harmful therapies. Information and advice to patients related to stratifying medicine is of particular importance. The equitable distribution of fees for diagnosis and counselling presents a particular challenge. The solidarity principle of public health insurance may be challenged by social and ethical issues of stratifying medicine. Conclusion: Stratifying medicine offers great potential to improve medical care. However, false hopes must be avoided. Providers and payers should measure chances and risks of stratifying medicine together for the welfare of the patients.
引用
收藏
页码:E69 / E73
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Challenges to the Russian health care system
    Shishkin, Sergey
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2007, 17 : 49 - 49
  • [22] Health insurance or health care? A comparison of health care systems
    Badura, B
    KOLNER ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIOLOGIE UND SOZIALPSYCHOLOGIE, 2004, 56 (03): : 583 - 584
  • [23] Does the health insurance governance system support health care programs?
    Anggraeni, Rini
    Irwandy
    Rizki, Fadila
    Basman, Muh Hajrani
    ENFERMERIA CLINICA, 2020, 30 : 13 - 16
  • [24] THE COLOMBIAN HEALTH INSURANCE SYSTEM AND ITS EFFECT ON ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE
    Stella Alvarez, Luz
    Salmon, J. Warren
    Swartzman, Dan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES, 2011, 41 (02): : 355 - 370
  • [25] Personalised Health Care: An Emerging Aim
    Vardas, Panos E.
    HELLENIC JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 49 (06) : 453 - 453
  • [26] The Behavioral Economics of Health and Health Care
    Rice, Thomas
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, VOL 34, 2013, 34 : 431 - 447
  • [27] The demand for health insurance and behavioural economics
    van Winssen, K. P. M.
    van Kleef, R. C.
    van de Ven, W. P. M. M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2016, 17 (06): : 653 - 657
  • [28] The economics of innovation in health and insurance markets
    Outreville, JF
    GENEVA PAPERS ON RISK AND INSURANCE-ISSUES AND PRACTICE, 2001, 26 (03): : 459 - 466
  • [29] The Economics of Innovation in Health and Insurance Markets
    J-François Outreville
    The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, 2001, 26 : 459 - 466
  • [30] The demand for health insurance and behavioural economics
    K. P. M. van Winssen
    R. C. van Kleef
    W. P. M. M. van de Ven
    The European Journal of Health Economics, 2016, 17 : 653 - 657