FAIRNESS PREFERENCE BASED DECISION-MAKING MODEL FOR CONCESSION PERIOD IN PPP PROJECTS

被引:10
|
作者
Yan, Xue [1 ]
Chong, Heap-Yih [2 ]
Zhou, Jing [1 ]
Sheng, Zhaohan [1 ]
Xu, Feng [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Sch Management & Engn, 22 Hankou Rd, Nanjing 210093, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Curtin Univ, Sch Built Environm, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家自然科学基金重大项目;
关键词
Concession period; fairness preference; Nash bargaining game; PPP projects; PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROJECTS; GAME-THEORY; NEGOTIATION;
D O I
10.3934/jimo.2018137
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Both government and private sector have the characteristic of fairness preference when deciding a suitable concession period for infrastructure projects. The appropriate concession period is helpful to construct the Public-Private-Partnership (PPP) project, to alleviate governments financial burden, and to boast the economic growth. Therefore, this paper aims to develop a decision-making model of concession period with fairness preference based on the two sides equitable utilities. To better describe decision makers fair psychology, the Nash bargaining game solution was adopted as a fair reference point. The results show that the concession period with fairness preference will become longer than that without fairness preference. Furthermore, the longer the concession period is, the better construction quality of the infrastructure project (highway) is. So, decision makers with fairness preference tend to make good decisions. In conclusion, the developed decision-making model renders useful references for both government and private sector in negotiating the concession period for infrastructure projects.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 23
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] System Dynamics Model to Determine Concession Period of PPP Infrastructure Projects: Overarching Effects of Critical Success Factors
    Ullah, Fahim
    Thaheem, Muhammad Jamaluddin
    Sepasgozar, Samad M. E.
    Forcada, Nuria
    JOURNAL OF LEGAL AFFAIRS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2018, 10 (04)
  • [32] A DECISION-MAKING MODEL WITH VECTOR FUZZY PREFERENCE-RELATION
    ZHUKOVIN, VE
    BURSHTEIN, FV
    KORELOV, ES
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1987, 22 (1-2) : 71 - 79
  • [33] Hierarchical decision-making model for planning and controlling stochastic projects
    GolenkoGinzburg, D
    Gonik, A
    Kesler, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 1996, 46 : 39 - 54
  • [34] A method based on trust model for large group decision-making with incomplete preference information
    Xu, Xuanhua
    Wang, Bing
    Zhou, Yanju
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2016, 30 (06) : 3551 - 3565
  • [35] Group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency
    Herrera-Viedma, Enrique
    Chiclana, Francisco
    Herrera, Francisco
    Alonso, Sergio
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART B-CYBERNETICS, 2007, 37 (01): : 176 - 189
  • [36] A Group Decision-Making Model Based on Regression Method with Hesitant Fuzzy Preference Relations
    Xue, Min
    Du, Yifei
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2017, 2017
  • [37] Fairness measures for decision-making and conflict resolution
    Apoorva M. Sampat
    Victor M. Zavala
    Optimization and Engineering, 2019, 20 : 1249 - 1272
  • [38] Ranking environmental projects model based on multicriteria decision-making and the weight sensitivity analysis
    Yan, Jiang
    Tian Dagang
    Yue, Pan
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND ELECTRONICS, 2007, 18 (03) : 534 - 539
  • [39] Public Participation Based Interactive Decision-making Model for Brownfield Redevelopment Projects (BRPs)
    Geng, Lise
    Zhu, Yuming
    Lin, Hongli
    Ahmad, Naveed
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), 2017, : 3323 - 3328
  • [40] TIME PREFERENCE IN MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING
    HELLER, DN
    REDELMEIER, DA
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1991, 11 (04) : 331 - 331