Experimental river diversion for marsh enhancement

被引:22
|
作者
Ward, GH
Irlbeck, MJ
Montagna, PA
机构
[1] US Bur Reclamat, Oklahoma Texas Area Off, Austin, TX 78701 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Ctr Res Water Resources, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[3] Univ Texas, Inst Marine Sci, Port Aransas, TX 78373 USA
来源
ESTUARIES | 2002年 / 25卷 / 6B期
关键词
Benthic Community; Freshwater Inflow; Increase Salt Concentration; Estuarine Ecosystem; Precipitation Difference;
D O I
10.1007/BF02692235
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Nueces River is the primary source of freshwater inflow to Corpus Christi Bay and virtually the only source of freshwater inflow to the Nueces Delta. In association with reservoir development and operation within the Nueces Basin, the magnitude of freshwater inflow has been greatly reduced since 1958. Continually increasing salt concentrations in the soil and water have compromised the function of the delta as a viable component of the estuarine ecosystem. In 1993, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation began a 5-yr diversion project to increase the opportunity for freshwater flow into the delta. With the excavation of two overflow channels, the minimum flooding threshold for the upper delta was significantly lowered, and more frequent diversions of freshwater from the Nueces River were enabled. During the 50-mo diversion period, the amount of freshwater diverted into the upper Nueces Delta was increased sevenfold. The average salinity gradient in the upper delta reverted to a more natural pattern, with average salinity concentrations decreasing from the lower (bay) to upper (riverine) delta, and a corresponding improvement in abundance and diversity of both intertidal vegetation and benthic communities.
引用
收藏
页码:1416 / 1425
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EXPERIMENTAL MARSH MANAGEMENT IMPOUNDMENTS
    TURNER, RE
    COWAN, JH
    MENDELSSOHN, IA
    PETERSON, GW
    SHAW, RF
    SWARZENSKI, C
    SWENSON, EM
    MARSH MANAGEMENT IN COASTAL LOUISIANA : EFFECTS AND ISSUES, 1989, 89 : 344 - 353
  • [32] Drainage rearrangement by river capture, beheading and diversion
    Bishop, P
    PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY, 1995, 19 (04) : 449 - 473
  • [33] Quaternary Diversion and Incision, Dearborn River, Montana
    Foley, Michael G.
    Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 1980, 91 (10 PART2): : 2152 - 2188
  • [34] River incision or diversion in response to bedrock uplift
    Humphrey, NF
    Konrad, SK
    GEOLOGY, 2000, 28 (01) : 43 - 46
  • [35] Woolston New Weir and River Mersey Diversion
    Tonks, DM
    Howells, R
    Bettes, R
    Morris, MW
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-WATER AND MARITIME ENGINEERING, 2002, 154 (01): : 51 - 61
  • [36] CRYOSPHERIC IMPACTS OF SOVIET RIVER DIVERSION SCHEMES
    HOLT, T
    KELLY, PM
    CHERRY, BSG
    ANNALS OF GLACIOLOGY, 1984, 5 : 61 - 68
  • [37] The Ecological Conservation of the Yellow River Delta Marsh
    Juan, Sun
    Li Qiangkun
    Xia, Zhang
    Hu Yawei
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL YELLOW RIVER FORUM ON SUSTAINABLE WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT AND DELTA ECOSYSTEM MAINTENANCE, VOL II, 2007, : 210 - 216
  • [38] Rehabilitation of chimney cavity of river diversion tunnel
    Jee, WR
    Shin, HY
    Choi, JJ
    Lim, HU
    CHALLENGES FOR THE 21ST CENTURY, VOL. 2: COMMUNICATION TUNNELS/MISCELLANEOUS INCLUDING WATER TUNNELS/MECHANISED TUNNELLING, 1999, : 713 - 720
  • [39] ENVIRONMENTALISM IN THE USSR - THE OPPOSITION TO THE RIVER DIVERSION PROJECTS
    DARST, RG
    SOVIET ECONOMY, 1988, 4 (03): : 223 - 252