The Key Elements of Medical Negligence-Duty

被引:2
|
作者
Luther, Gregg W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Gregg W Luther PLLC, 9112 N Kelley Ave,Ste A, Oklahoma City, OK 73131 USA
关键词
Duty; Medical negligence; Risk management;
D O I
10.1093/neuros/nyab077
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
American tort law (a.k.a. negligence) is designed to be flexible and elastic to adapt to changes in time and public policy. It provides a structure of elements and factors to be applied to each case's specific facts on a case-by-case basis. The purpose of this structure is to achieve as much uniformity as possible in the application of tort law. One side effect is that this structure makes predicting the outcome difficult because of so many variables. In addition, there is no national tort law. Instead, each state has developed its own law in the area of torts, which has resulted in differing exceptions and requirements based on where the medical care was given. The purpose of this article is to explain the first element of a negligence case-"duty to use care"-and its accompanying factors/variables. The first element that must be established in a medical negligence case is a duty to use care. In short, this means the physician must use a certain level of care in providing medical services. The physician typically owes her or his patient the duty to exercise care. However, there are special situations in which a physician may not owe a duty of care and thus cannot be held liable for medical negligence. This article is designed to provide an overview of the most common situations and summarizes the processes to determine whether a duty is owed.
引用
收藏
页码:1051 / 1054
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Medical negligence
    Nilegaonkar, Sujit
    Kulkarni, Padmaj
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND PAEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 40 (04) : 552 - 553
  • [32] DUTY OF CARE IN NEGLIGENCE: A RETURN TO ORTHODOXY?
    Tofaris, Stelios
    CAMBRIDGE LAW JOURNAL, 2018, 77 (03): : 454 - 457
  • [33] The duty of care in gross negligence manslaughter
    Herring, Jonathan
    Palser, Elaine
    CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW, 2007, : 24 - 40
  • [34] MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE LAW .5. ACTING AS A MEDICAL EXPERT IN MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE CASES
    KORGAONKAR, GJA
    TRIBE, DMR
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 1991, 46 (03): : 177 - 178
  • [35] BREACH OF STATUTORY DUTY AS NEGLIGENCE PER SE
    不详
    MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW, 1917, 1 (01) : 76 - 79
  • [36] The restatement (third) and the place of duty in negligence law
    Goldberg, JCP
    Zipursky, BC
    VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW, 2001, 54 (03) : 657 - 750
  • [37] COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE AND THE DUTY-RISK ANALYSIS
    JOHNSON, A
    LOUISIANA LAW REVIEW, 1980, 40 (02): : 319 - 341
  • [38] Medical negligence and the law
    Maughan, PJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (07) : 899 - 900
  • [39] DOCTORS AND MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE
    PELL, ACH
    WALKER, BR
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1990, 300 (6726): : 747 - 747
  • [40] COMPENSATION FOR MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE
    TAYLOR, AM
    TAYLOR, RW
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1988, 297 (6658): : 1271 - 1271