Reliability and validity of a scoring instrument for clinical performance during Pediatric Advanced Life Support simulation scenarios

被引:66
|
作者
Donoghue, Aaron [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Nishisaki, Akira [2 ]
Sutton, Robert [2 ]
Hales, Roberta
Boulet, John [4 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Div Emergency Med, Ctr Simulat Adv Educ & Innovat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Div Pediat Crit Care Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Div Pediat Emergency Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Fdn Advancement Int Med Educ & Res, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
Simulation; Pediatric Advanced Life Support; Education; CARDIOPULMONARY ARRESTS; CARDIAC-ARREST; RESUSCITATION; RESIDENTS; SKILLS; INTUBATION; KNOWLEDGE; CHILDREN; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.11.011
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Aim: To assess the reliability and validity of scoring instruments designed to measure clinical performance during simulated resuscitations requiring the use of Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) algorithms. Methods: Pediatric residents were invited to participate in an educational trial involving simulated resuscitations that employ PALS algorithms. Each subject participated in I session comprised of four scenarios (asystole, dysrhythmia, respiratory at-rest, shock). Video-recorded sessions were independently reviewed and scored by four raters using instruments designed to Measure performance in terms of timing, sequence, and quality. Validity was assessed by two-factor analysis of variance with postgraduate year (PGY-1 versus PGY-2) as all independent variable. Reliability was assessed by calculation of overall inter-rater reliability (IRR) as well as a generalizability study to estimate variance components of individual measurement facets (scenarios, raters) and associated interactions. Results: 20 subjects were scored by four raters. Based on a two-factor ANOVA, PGY-2s Outperformed PGY-1s (p < 0.05): significant differences in difficulty existed between the four scenarios, with dysrhythmia scores being the lowest. Overall IRR was high (0.81) and most variance Could be attributed to subject (17%), scenario (13%), and the interaction between Subject and scenario (52%): variance attributable to rater was minimal (1.4%). Conclusions: The instruments assessed in this Study measure clinical performance during PALS scenarios in a reliable and valid manner. Measurement error Could be minimized further through the use of additional scenarios but additional raters, fora given scenario, Would not improve reliability. Further Studies should assess validity of measurement with respect to actual clinical performance during resuscitations. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 336
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Design, Validity, and Reliability of a Pediatric Resident JumpSTART Disaster Triage Scoring Instrument
    Cicero, Mark X.
    Riera, Antonio
    Northrup, Veronika
    Auerbach, Marc
    Pearson, Kevin
    Baum, Carl R.
    [J]. ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS, 2013, 13 (01) : 48 - 54
  • [2] Designing Simulation Scenarios to Support Performance Assessment Validity
    O'Brien, Janet E.
    Hagler, Debra
    Thompson, Marilyn S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN NURSING, 2015, 46 (11): : 492 - 498
  • [3] Reliability and validity of the instrument for scoring clinical outcomes of research for epidermolysis bullosa (iscorEB)
    Bruckner, A. L.
    Fairclough, D. L.
    Feinstein, J. A.
    Lara-Corrales, I.
    Lucky, A. W.
    Tolar, J.
    Pope, E.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2018, 178 (05) : 1128 - 1134
  • [4] Evaluating pediatric advanced life support in emergency medical services with a performance and safety scoring tool
    Bahr, Nathan
    Meckler, Garth
    Hansen, Matthew
    Guise, Jeanne-Marie
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 48 : 301 - 306
  • [5] Development of an instrument for the evaluation of advanced life support performance
    Peltonen, L-M.
    Peltonen, V.
    Salantera, S.
    Tommila, M.
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2017, 61 (09) : 1215 - 1231
  • [6] Delays and errors among pediatric residents during simulated resuscitation scenarios using Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) algorithms
    Labrosse, Melanie
    Levy, Arielle
    Donoghue, Aaron
    Gravel, Jocelyn
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 33 (10): : 1516 - 1518
  • [7] VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF AN INSTRUMENT THAT EVALUATES PHARMD STUDENT PERFORMANCE DURING A PATIENT PRESENTATION
    BECK, DE
    CLAYTON, AG
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 1990, 54 (03) : 268 - 274
  • [8] Effect of a Checklist on Advanced Trauma Life Support Task Performance During Pediatric Trauma Resuscitation
    Kelleher, Deirdre C.
    Carter, Elizabeth A.
    Waterhouse, Lauren J.
    Parsons, Samantha E.
    Fritzeen, Jennifer L.
    Burd, Randall S.
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 21 (10) : 1129 - 1134
  • [9] Validity and Reliability Assessment of Detailed Scoring Checklists for Use During Perioperative Emergency Simulation Training
    McEvoy, Matthew D.
    Hand, William R.
    Furse, Cory M.
    Field, Larry C.
    Clark, Carlee A.
    Moitra, Vivek K.
    Nietert, Paul J.
    O'Connor, Michael F.
    Nunnally, Mark E.
    [J]. SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2014, 9 (05): : 295 - 303
  • [10] Performance of a consensus scoring algorithm for assessing pediatric advanced life support competency using a computer screen-based simulator
    Ventre, Kathleen M.
    Collingridge, Dave S.
    DeCarlo, Deborah
    Schwid, Howard A.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 10 (06) : 623 - 635