Development of an instrument for the evaluation of advanced life support performance

被引:2
|
作者
Peltonen, L-M. [1 ,2 ]
Peltonen, V. [3 ,4 ]
Salantera, S. [1 ,5 ]
Tommila, M. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Dept Nursing Sci, Turku 20014, Finland
[2] Turku Univ Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Turku, Finland
[3] Univ Turku, Dept Clin Med, Turku, Finland
[4] Satakunta Cent Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Intens Care, Pori, Finland
[5] Turku Univ Hosp, Dev Serv, Turku, Finland
[6] Turku Univ Hosp, Div Perioperat Serv Intens Care Med & Pain Manage, Turku, Finland
[7] Univ Turku, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, Turku, Finland
关键词
CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION SKILLS; HOSPITAL CARDIAC-ARREST; ASSESSMENT MEASURE TEAM; NONTECHNICAL SKILLS; ASSESSMENT-TOOL; SELF-EFFICACY; VALIDITY; VALIDATION; RELIABILITY; COMPETENCE;
D O I
10.1111/aas.12960
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BackgroundAssessing advanced life support (ALS) competence requires validated instruments. Existing instruments include aspects of technical skills (TS), non-technical skills (NTS) or both, but one instrument for detailed assessment that suits all resuscitation situations is lacking. This study aimed to develop an instrument for the evaluation of the overall ALS performance of the whole team. MethodsThis instrument development study had four phases. First, we reviewed literature and resuscitation guidelines to explore items to include in the instrument. Thereafter, we interviewed resuscitation team professionals (n=66), using the critical incident technique, to determine possible additional aspects associated with the performance of ALS. Second, we developed an instrument based on the findings. Third, we used an expert panel (n=20) to assess the validity of the developed instrument. Finally, we revised the instrument based on the experts' comments and tested it with six experts who evaluated 22 video recorded resuscitations. ResultsThe final version of the developed instrument had 69 items divided into adherence to guidelines (28 items), clinical decision-making (5 items), workload management (12 items), team behaviour (8 items), information management (6 items), patient integrity and consideration of laymen (4 items) and work routines (6 items). The Cronbach's values were good, and strong correlations between the overall performance and the instrument were observed. ConclusionThe instrument may be useful for detailed assessment of the team's overall performance, but the numerous items make the use demanding. The instrument is still under development, and more research is needed to determine its psychometric properties.
引用
收藏
页码:1215 / 1231
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF AN OBJECTIVE CRITERION-REFERENCED TOOL FOR EVALUATION OF ADVANCED CARDIAC LIFE SUPPORT PERFORMANCE
    MANCINI, ME
    KAYE, WE
    [J]. HEART & LUNG, 1985, 14 (03): : 299 - 300
  • [2] Written evaluation in advanced cardiovascular life support is not a predictor for cardiac arrest performance
    Rodgers, Bavid L.
    Pauley, Rudy D.
    McKee, Barbara R.
    Matics, David J.
    Robinson, Louis E.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2007, 116 (16) : 942 - 942
  • [3] EVALUATION WITH THE MEGA CODE OF THE PERFORMANCE OF THE ADVANCED CARDIAC LIFE SUPPORT TEAM LEADER
    KAYE, W
    MANCINI, ME
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1983, 11 (03) : 227 - 227
  • [4] Written evaluation is not a predictor for skills performance in an Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support course
    Rodgers, David L.
    Bhanji, Farhan
    McKee, Barbara R.
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2010, 81 (04) : 453 - 456
  • [5] Elaboration and application of an evaluation instrument in the immediate postoperative period, based on the Advanced Trauma Life Support protocol
    Von Atzingen, Marisa Dias
    Schmidt, Denise Rodrigues Costa
    Penha Martins Nonino, Eleine Aparecida
    [J]. ACTA PAULISTA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2008, 21 (04) : 616 - 623
  • [6] Reliability and validity of a scoring instrument for clinical performance during Pediatric Advanced Life Support simulation scenarios
    Donoghue, Aaron
    Nishisaki, Akira
    Sutton, Robert
    Hales, Roberta
    Boulet, John
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2010, 81 (03) : 331 - 336
  • [7] Evaluation of an online advanced life support program
    Taylor, S.
    Bain, D.
    Whitington, M.
    Harris, J.
    Livingstone, W.
    Pennington, K.
    Hall, W.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2011, 24 (01) : 74 - 75
  • [8] THE DEVELOPMENT OF A PERFORMANCE EVALUATION INSTRUMENT FOR UPWARD EVALUATION OF SUPERVISORS BY SUBORDINATES
    RUBIN, R
    [J]. LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH, 1994, 16 (04) : 315 - 328
  • [9] A Self-Evaluation Instrument for Work Performance and Support Needs
    Brady, Michael P.
    Rosenberg, Howard
    Frain, Michael P.
    [J]. CAREER DEVELOPMENT AND TRANSITION FOR EXCEPTIONAL INDIVIDUALS, 2008, 31 (03) : 175 - 185
  • [10] Evaluation of occupational performance in everyday life in addicted population. Development of a measuring instrument: the ADO
    Rojo Mota, Gloria
    Pedrero Perez, Eduardo Jose
    Ruiz Sanchez de Leon, Jose Maria
    Llanero Luque, Marcos
    Puerta Garcia, Carmen
    [J]. ADICCIONES, 2011, 23 (01) : 27 - 35