Limitations of cyclosporine C2 monitoring in pediatric heart transplant recipients

被引:3
|
作者
Hmiel, S. Paul [1 ]
Canter, Charles [1 ]
Shepherd, Ross [1 ]
Lassa-Claxton, Sherr [1 ]
Nadler, Michelle [1 ]
机构
[1] St Louis Childrens Hosp, Div Pediat Nephrol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-3046.2007.00712.x
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Monitoring CSA levels at two h after dosing (C2) has been shown effective in providing adequate CSA-based immunosuppression in clinical trials in adult transplant recipients, but there is limited data regarding C2 monitoring in pediatric transplant recipients. Given the differences in CSA pharmacokinetics between children and adults, a cohort of stable pediatric transplant recipients was converted from monitoring CSA trough (C0) to C2 levels, to establish the clinical utility and safety of C2 monitoring. After an abbreviated AUC(0-5) to establish baseline exposure, subsequent CSA dosing was adjusted based on C2 levels. Additional evaluation included monitoring for rejection, changes in CSA dose, toxicity, serum chemistries, and infection. Twelve heart transplant recipients were enrolled, with mean age 4.8 yr (range: 0.6-14.0). All patients received microemulsified CSA (Neoral (R); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ, USA) twice daily. Baseline CSA dose was 5.39 +/- 2.05 mg/kg/day (mean +/- s.d.), with mean C0 = 267 +/- 112, C2 = 1065 +/- 565, and AUC(0-5) = 3817 +/- 1435. Only seven participants showed clear CSA peak levels at two h, with five exhibiting delayed peaks at three to five h post-dose. These seven participants completed 48 wk of study, with mean CSA dose decreasing to 4.55 +/- 3.61 mg/kg/day, maintaining mean C2 599 +/- 211 (vs. target C2 = 800). No significant change in serum creatinine was observed, although GFR increased from 76.9 to 107.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (p = 0.11). Five patients failed to achieve target C2 levels (>800) during the first four wk, despite comparable AUC values, and were maintained on trough monitoring (C0). Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures fell slightly, three minor infections were noted during the study period, and one episode of acute rejection occurred, despite stable CSA dosing. Nearly 50% of stable pediatric transplant recipients failed to achieve adequate peak C2 CSA levels during conversion from C0 to C2 monitoring. Age-dependent differences in CSA absorption and/or clearance pharmacokinetics may explain these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:524 / 529
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] History of C2 monitoring in heart and liver transplant patients treated with cyclosporine microemulsion
    Cantarovich, M
    Barkun, J
    Giannetti, N
    Cecere, R
    Besner, JG
    Tchervenkov, J
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 36 (02) : 442S - 447S
  • [22] Determination of C2 trough levels of cyclosporine is superior to CO measurement for rejection monitoring in pediatric heart transplant patients
    Schubert, S.
    Lehmkuhl, H.
    Abdul-Kbaliq, H.
    Miera, O.
    Hiemann, N.
    Huebler, M.
    Weng, Y.
    Knosalla, C.
    Berger, F.
    Hetzer, R.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 25 (02): : S85 - S86
  • [23] Impact of late conversion from C0 to C2 monitoring of microemulsified cyclosporine in pediatric living donor liver transplant recipients
    Takatsuki, M
    Chen, CL
    Chen, YS
    Wang, CC
    Lin, CC
    Yang, CH
    Yong, CC
    Liu, YW
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 18 (06) : 694 - 699
  • [24] Conversion to C2 monitoring of cyclosporine A exposure in maintenance kidney transplant recipients:: Results at 3 years
    Di Paolo, S
    Teutonico, A
    Schena, A
    Infante, B
    Stallone, G
    Grandaliano, G
    Ditonno, P
    Battaglia, M
    Schena, FP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2004, 44 (05) : 886 - 892
  • [25] Comparison of trough level and C2 cyclosporine blood concentration monitoring in outpatient kidney transplant recipients
    Braun, F
    Armstrong, VW
    Lorf, T
    Canelo, R
    Arndt, C
    Oellerich, M
    Ringe, B
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (7-8) : 3108 - 3109
  • [26] Neoral (cyclosporine) C2 monitoring in renal transplant recipients:: A single-center experience in Asia
    Wong, HS
    Morad, Z
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 35 (01) : 230 - 231
  • [27] Clinical benefit of monitoring cyclosporine C2 and C4 in long-term liver transplant recipients
    Barakat, O
    Peaston, R
    Rai, R
    Talbot, D
    Manas, D
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 34 (05) : 1535 - 1537
  • [28] Cyclosporine monitoring in renal transplant recipients with induction therapy:: C2 levels in patients monitored on C0
    Loichot, C
    Bentue-Ferrer, D
    Bernard, N
    Bonardet, A
    Boulieu, R
    Kergueris, MF
    Paintaud, G
    Peytavin, G
    Simon, N
    Marquet, P
    FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 20 (01) : 91 - 96
  • [29] C2 MONITORING IN RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS: IS IT SAFE AND EFFECTIVE?
    Gedela, S.
    Baliga, K., V
    NEPHROLOGY, 2005, 10 : A211 - A211
  • [30] C2 monitoring in maintenance renal transplant recipients:: Is it worthwhile?
    Midtvedt, K
    Fauchald, P
    Bergan, S
    Hoieggen, A
    Hallan, S
    Svarstad, E
    Bergrem, H
    Eriksen, BO
    Pfeffer, PF
    Dalen, I
    Leivestad, T
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 76 (08) : 1236 - 1238