Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on cardiovascular events, death, and major safety outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:346
|
作者
Wu, Jason H. Y. [1 ]
Foote, Celine [1 ,2 ]
Blomster, Juuso [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Toyama, Tadashi [1 ]
Perkovic, Vlado [1 ,5 ]
Sundstrom, Johan [1 ,6 ]
Neal, Bruce [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, George Inst Global Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
[2] Concord Repatriat Gen Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Turku, Turku, Finland
[4] Univ Gothenberg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Gothenburg, Sweden
[5] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Uppsala Clin Res Ctr, Dept Med Sci, Uppsala, Sweden
[7] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London, England
来源
LANCET DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY | 2016年 / 4卷 / 05期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
INADEQUATE GLYCEMIC CONTROL; ADD-ON THERAPY; SELECTIVE SGLT2 INHIBITOR; DRUG-NAIVE PATIENTS; LONG-TERM EFFICACY; DOUBLE-BLIND; BLOOD-PRESSURE; BODY-WEIGHT; FOLLOW-UP; DAPAGLIFLOZIN MONOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/S2213-8587(16)00052-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background In patients with type 2 diabetes, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are known to reduce glucose concentrations, blood pressure, and weight, but to increase LDL cholesterol and the incidence of urogenital infections. Protection against cardiovascular events has also been reported, as have possible increased risks of adverse outcomes such as ketoacidosis and bone fracture. We aimed to establish the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular events, death, and safety outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes, both overall and separately for individual drugs. Methods In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and websites of US, European, and Japanese regulatory authorities from Jan 1, 1950, to Sept 30, 2015, for data from prospective randomised controlled trials assessing the effects of SGLT2 treatment compared with controls. We excluded duplicate reports, trials of compound drugs, trials that lasted 7 days or fewer, trials that did not report on outcomes of interest, and articles that presented pooled trial data for which the individual trials could not be identified. We extracted data in duplicate using a standardised approach. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, admission to hospital for unstable angina, heart failure, and all-cause mortality. We estimated summary relative risks with fixed-effects meta-analysis, with the I-2 statistic used to estimate heterogeneity of results beyond chance. Findings The analyses included data from six regulatory submissions (37 525 participants) and 57 published trials (33 385 participants), which provided data for seven different SGLT2 inhibitors. SGLT2 inhibitors protected against the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (relative risk 0.84 [95% CI 0.75-0.95]; p=0.006), cardiovascular death (0.63 [0.51-0.77]; p<0.0001), heart failure (0.65 [0.50-0.85]; p=0.002), and death from any cause (0.71 [0.61-0.83]; p<0.0001). No clear effect was apparent for non-fatal myocardial infarction (0.88 [0.72-1.07]; p=0.18) or angina (0.95 [0.73-1.23]; p=0.70), but we noted an adverse effect for non-fatal stroke (1.30 [1.00-1.68]; p=0.049). We noted no clear evidence that the individual drugs had different effects on cardiovascular outcomes or death (all I I-2 < 43%). Safety analyses showed consistent increased risks of genital infections (regulatory submissions 4.75 [4.00-5.63]; scientific reports 2.88 [2.48-3.34]), but findings for some safety outcomes varied depending on whether anlayses were based on data extracted from regulatory submissions or trials reported in the scientific literature. Interpretation These data suggest net protection of SGLT2 inhibitors against cardiovascular outcomes and death. The efficacy results were driven by findings for empagliflozin (the only SGLT2 inhibitor for which data from a dedicated long-term cardiovascular safety trial have been reported), although results for the other drugs in the class were not clearly different. Adverse events were more difficult to quantify than was efficacy, with the effects of individual drugs in the class seeming to differ for some safety outcomes. Results from ongoing studies will be crucial to substantiate these findings across the drug class, but the available data provide a strong rationale to expect benefit from use of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of cardiovascular events.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 419
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cardiovascular Benefit of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review
    Georgiou, Petros
    Shi, Wangpan
    Serhiyenia, Tatsiana
    Akram, Aqsa
    Proute, Matthew C.
    Pradeep, Roshini
    Kerolos, Mina E.
    Khan, Safeera
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (10)
  • [22] Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on the cardiovascular and renal complications of type 2 diabetes
    Chilton, Robert J.
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2020, 22 (01): : 16 - 29
  • [23] Longer-term Benefits and Risks of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Jason T. Alexander
    Erin M. Staab
    Wen Wan
    Melissa Franco
    Alexandra Knitter
    M. Reza Skandari
    Shari Bolen
    Nisa M. Maruthur
    Elbert S. Huang
    Louis H. Philipson
    Aaron N. Winn
    Celeste C. Thomas
    Meltem Zeytinoglu
    Valerie G. Press
    Elizabeth L. Tung
    Kathryn Gunter
    Brittany Bindon
    Sanjay Jumani
    Neda Laiteerapong
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2022, 37 : 439 - 448
  • [24] Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and cancer outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Spiazzi, Bernardo F.
    Naibo, Rafaella A.
    Wayerbacher, Laura F.
    Piccoli, Giovana F.
    Farenzena, Laura P.
    Londero, Thiza M.
    da Natividade, Gabriella R.
    Zoldan, Maira
    Degobi, Nathalia A. H.
    Niches, Matheus
    Lopes, Gilberto
    Boyko, Edward J.
    Utzschneider, Kristina M.
    Colpani, Veronica
    Gerchman, Fernando
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2023, 198
  • [25] Effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on cardiac remodelling: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Nan
    Wang, Yueying
    Tse, Gary
    Korantzopoulos, Panagiotis
    Letsas, Konstantinos P.
    Zhang, Qingpeng
    Li, Guangping
    Lip, Gregory Y. H.
    Liu, Tong
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 28 (17) : 1961 - 1973
  • [26] Efficacy and Safety of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in East Asians with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yang, Lidan
    Zhang, Lin
    He, He
    Zhang, Mei
    An, Zhenmei
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2019, 10 (05) : 1921 - 1934
  • [27] Efficacy and Safety of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in East Asians with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lidan Yang
    Lin Zhang
    He He
    Mei Zhang
    Zhenmei An
    Diabetes Therapy, 2019, 10 : 1921 - 1934
  • [28] Pancreatic safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tang, Huilin
    Yang, Keming
    Li, Xin
    Song, Yiqing
    Han, Jiali
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 29 (02) : 161 - 172
  • [29] Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors use and the risk of gout: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lai, Shih-Wei
    Hwang, Bing-Fang
    Kuo, Yu-Hung
    Liu, Chiu-Shong
    Liao, Kuan-Fu
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [30] Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Patients With Heart Failure A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Zou, Xinyu
    Shi, Qingyang
    Vandvik, Per Olav
    Guyatt, Gordon
    Lang, Chim C.
    Parpia, Sameer
    Wang, Si
    Agarwal, Arnav
    Zhou, Yiling
    Zhu, Ye
    Tian, Haoming
    Zhu, Zhiming
    Li, Sheyu
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2022, 175 (06) : 851 - +