Stress distribution in reinforced railway structures

被引:13
|
作者
Esen, A. F. [1 ]
Woodward, P. K. [2 ]
Laghrouche, O. [1 ]
Connolly, D. P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Heriot Watt Univ, Inst Infrastruct & Environm, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Leeds, Inst High Speed Rail & Syst Integrat, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Full-scale railway track testing; Railroad ballasted track; High-speed rail slab track; Conventional embankment; Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil; High-speed railway earthworks; FIELD ASSESSMENT; TRACK-BED; SUBGRADE; BEHAVIOR; TRAIN; PERFORMANCE; GEOSYNTHETICS; DEFORMATION; FACILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100699
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper evaluates the performance of a geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining wall (GRS-RW) system as an alternative to a conventional railway embankment. The aim is to investigate the behaviour of the GRS-RW system in terms of displacements and stress levels at different locations in the track and substructure. Fullscale laboratory experimental testing is carried out on a GRS-RW structure, supporting sections of ballasted and slab track, under moving loads at 360 km/h. The tracks are supported by a low-level fully confined conventional embankment and a GRS-RW system, which are constructed to high-speed standards. Displacement transducers and earth pressure cells are placed at different locations to record the displacements of the track and the stress levels in the substructure. The test results show that the pressure levels on the GRS-RW wall are negligibly small for the particular test setup, proving the GRS structure under the action of compaction reached its active state. This means that the reinforced soil was self-supporting under its self-weight and train loads, meaning there was minimal pressure on the walls. Therefore, GRS-RW systems are better alternatives to traditional earth embankments due to enhanced soil stabilisation and less land take.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] STRESS DISTRIBUTION FOR HEAVY EMBEDDED STRUCTURES
    BHUSHAN, K
    HALEY, SC
    JOURNAL OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING DIVISION-ASCE, 1978, 104 (01): : 144 - 145
  • [22] Modelling stress distribution in substructure of French conventional railway tracks
    Zhang, T. W.
    Cui, Y. J.
    Lamas-Lopez, F.
    Calon, N.
    D'Aguiar, S. Costa
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2016, 116 : 326 - 334
  • [23] STRESS DISTRIBUTION FOR HEAVY EMBEDDED STRUCTURES
    CHEN, WWH
    HUANG, W
    JOURNAL OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING DIVISION-ASCE, 1977, 103 (07): : 818 - 820
  • [24] Multidimensional Model for the Stress Analysis of Reinforced Shell Structures
    Zappino, Enrico
    Carrera, Erasmo
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2018, 56 (04) : 1647 - 1661
  • [25] Cracking analysis of plane stress reinforced concrete structures
    Busso, Francesco
    Anerdi, Costanza
    Bertagnoli, Gabriele
    5TH WORLD MULTIDISCIPLINARY CIVIL ENGINEERING-ARCHITECTURE-URBAN PLANNING SYMPOSIUM (WMCAUS), 2020, 960
  • [26] PREDICTION OF ONSET OF STRESS CRACKS IN REINFORCED THIN STRUCTURES
    LEMAITRE, J
    REVUE DE PHYSIQUE APPLIQUEE, 1974, 9 (04): : 667 - 672
  • [27] ADHESIVES AND STRESS-DISTRIBUTION OF A PLATE WITH REINFORCED HOLE
    JINDAL, UC
    ADHESIVES AGE, 1983, 26 (08): : 25 - 28
  • [28] A study of stress distribution in geogrid-reinforced sand
    Gabr, MA
    Dodson, R
    Collin, JG
    GEOSYNTHETICS IN FOUNDATION REINFORCEMENT AND EROSION CONTROL SYSTEMS, 1998, (76): : 62 - 76
  • [29] STUDY OF STRESS DISTRIBUTION NEAR RECESSES IN REINFORCED PLATES
    GUZ, AN
    SHNERENKO, KI
    DOPOVIDI AKADEMII NAUK UKRAINSKOI RSR SERIYA A-FIZIKO-MATEMATICHNI TA TECHNICHNI NAUKI, 1978, (08): : 698 - 701
  • [30] Reinforced concrete railway ties
    不详
    JOURNAL OF THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE, 1905, 160 : 252 - 252