Stress distribution in reinforced railway structures

被引:13
|
作者
Esen, A. F. [1 ]
Woodward, P. K. [2 ]
Laghrouche, O. [1 ]
Connolly, D. P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Heriot Watt Univ, Inst Infrastruct & Environm, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Leeds, Inst High Speed Rail & Syst Integrat, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Full-scale railway track testing; Railroad ballasted track; High-speed rail slab track; Conventional embankment; Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil; High-speed railway earthworks; FIELD ASSESSMENT; TRACK-BED; SUBGRADE; BEHAVIOR; TRAIN; PERFORMANCE; GEOSYNTHETICS; DEFORMATION; FACILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100699
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper evaluates the performance of a geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining wall (GRS-RW) system as an alternative to a conventional railway embankment. The aim is to investigate the behaviour of the GRS-RW system in terms of displacements and stress levels at different locations in the track and substructure. Fullscale laboratory experimental testing is carried out on a GRS-RW structure, supporting sections of ballasted and slab track, under moving loads at 360 km/h. The tracks are supported by a low-level fully confined conventional embankment and a GRS-RW system, which are constructed to high-speed standards. Displacement transducers and earth pressure cells are placed at different locations to record the displacements of the track and the stress levels in the substructure. The test results show that the pressure levels on the GRS-RW wall are negligibly small for the particular test setup, proving the GRS structure under the action of compaction reached its active state. This means that the reinforced soil was self-supporting under its self-weight and train loads, meaning there was minimal pressure on the walls. Therefore, GRS-RW systems are better alternatives to traditional earth embankments due to enhanced soil stabilisation and less land take.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条