A Comparison of Red Snapper Reproductive Potential in the Northwestern Gulf of Mexico: Natural versus Artificial Habitats

被引:23
|
作者
Glenn, Hilary D. [1 ,2 ]
Cowan, James H., Jr. [1 ]
Powers, Joseph E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Oceanog & Coastal Sci, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[2] Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, 650 Capitol Mall,Suite 5-100, Sacramento, CA 95814 USA
来源
MARINE AND COASTAL FISHERIES | 2017年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
COD GADUS-MORHUA; LUTJANUS-CAMPECHANUS; SPAWNING FREQUENCY; BLACK DRUM; SEA PLAICE; GROWTH; AGE; BIOLOGY; FISH; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1080/19425120.2017.1282896
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
The majority of the research on adult Red Snapper Lutjanus campechanus in the Gulf of Mexico has been conducted at artificial habitats (in particular, low-relief artificial reefs off the coast of Alabama) and more recently on oil and gas platforms off the coast of Louisiana. However, previous studies indicate that there are differences in Red Snapper demographics and reproductive biology between habitats and regions within the Gulf. Despite the lack of study of natural reefs and banks in the Gulf, these areas are believed to be the historical centers of Red Snapper abundance. This study sampled Red Snapper from habitats that include reefs located more than 125 km offshore, making them difficult to reach for routine sampling. The results indicate significant differences in Red Snapper reproductive biology between females collected on adjacent artificial and natural habitats. Annual fecundity estimates were almost 20-fold higher in fish collected from natural habitats. Due to the high number of artificial habitats in the Gulf, these results suggest that accounting for metapopulation differences in reproductive potential is important in evaluating the status of this resource.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 148
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Nursery habitats, growth rates, and seasonality of age-0 red snapper, Lutjanus campechanus, in the northeast Gulf of Mexico
    Szedlmayer, ST
    Conti, J
    FISHERY BULLETIN, 1999, 97 (03): : 626 - 635
  • [42] Multidecadal meta-analysis of reproductive parameters of female red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) in the northern Gulf of Mexico
    Brown-Peterson, Nancy J.
    Peterson, Christopher R.
    Fitzhugh, Gary R.
    FISHERY BULLETIN, 2019, 117 (1-2): : 37 - 49
  • [43] Estimation of Hook Selectivity of Red Snapper and Vermilion Snapper from Fishery-Independent Surveys of Natural Reefs in the Northern Gulf of Mexico
    Campbell, Matthew D.
    Pollack, Adam G.
    Driggers, William B.
    Hoffmayer, Eric R.
    MARINE AND COASTAL FISHERIES, 2014, 6 (01): : 260 - 273
  • [44] Feeding ecology of red snapper Lutjanus campechanus in the northern Gulf of Mexico
    Wells, R. J. David
    Cowan, James H., Jr.
    Fry, Brian
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2008, 361 : 213 - 225
  • [45] DNA microsatellite loci and genetic structure of red snapper in the Gulf of Mexico
    Heist, EJ
    Gold, JR
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY, 2000, 129 (02) : 469 - 475
  • [46] The Gulf of Mexico Red Snapper IFQ Program: The First Five Years
    Agar, Juan J.
    Stephen, Jessica A.
    Strelcheck, Andy
    Diagne, Assane
    MARINE RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2014, 29 (02) : 177 - 198
  • [47] Predominant Bacteria Associated with Red Snapper from the Northern Gulf of Mexico
    Arias, Covadonga R.
    Koenders, Kevin
    Larsen, Andrea M.
    JOURNAL OF AQUATIC ANIMAL HEALTH, 2013, 25 (04) : 281 - 289
  • [48] Variability in Red Snapper Otolith Microchemistry Among Gulf of Mexico Regions
    Louisiana State University and Agricultural and amp
    Mechanical College
  • [49] Genetic studies of Red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) in the northern Gulf of Mexico
    Saillant, E
    Gold, JR
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTY-FIFTH ANNUAL GULF AND CARIBBEAN FISHERIES INSTITUTE, 2004, : 811 - 820
  • [50] Acoustic positioning and movement patterns of red snapper Lutjanus campechanus around artificial reefs in the northern Gulf of Mexico
    Williams-Grove, Laura Jay
    Szedlmayer, Stephen T.
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2016, 553 : 233 - 251