CT-Colonography vs. Colonoscopy for Detection of High-Risk Sessile Serrated Polyps

被引:70
|
作者
IJspeert, J. E. G. [1 ]
Nolthenius, C. J. Tutein [2 ]
Kuipers, E. J. [3 ]
van Leerdam, M. E. [4 ]
Nio, C. Y. [2 ]
Thomeer, M. G. J. [5 ]
Biermann, K. [6 ]
van de Vijver, M. J. [7 ]
Dekker, E. [1 ]
Stoker, J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[7] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2016年 / 111卷 / 04期
关键词
SOCIETY-TASK-FORCE; COLORECTAL-CANCER; SURVEILLANCE; POLYPECTOMY; CLASSIFICATION; PREVALENCE; NEOPLASIA; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1038/ajg.2016.58
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Sessile serrated polyps (SSPs) are suggested to be the precursors of 15-30% of all colorectal cancers (CRCs). Therefore, CRC screening modalities should also be designed to detect high-risk SSPs. We compared computed tomography colonography (CTC) with colonoscopy-based screening for the detection of high-risk SSPs in average-risk individuals. METHODS: Data from a randomized controlled trial that compared CTC with colonoscopy for population screening were used for the analysis. Individuals diagnosed at CTC with a lesion >= 10 mm in size were referred for colonoscopy. Individuals with only 6-9 mm lesions were offered surveillance CTC. This surveillance CTC was followed by a colonoscopy when a lesion >= 6 mm was detected. Yield of both was accumulated to mimic current American College of Radiology CTC referral strategy (referral of individuals with any lesion >= 6 mm). Per participant detection of >= 1 high-risk (dysplastic and/or = 10 mm) SSP was compared with colonoscopy using multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: In total, 8,844 individuals were invited to participate (in 2: 1 allocation), of which 1,276 colonoscopy and 982 CTC invitees participated in the study. In the colonoscopy arm, 4.3% of individuals were diagnosed with >= 1 high-risk SSP, compared with 0.8% in the CTC arm (odds ratio (OR) 5.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6-11.6; P<0.001). In total, 3.1% of individuals in the colonoscopy arm were diagnosed with high-risk SSPs as most advanced lesion, compared with 0.4% in the CTC arm (OR 7.7; 95% CI 2.7-21.6; P<0.001). The current CTC strategy showed a marked lower detection for especially fl at high-risk SSPs (17 vs. 0), high-risk SSP located in the proximal colon (32 vs. 1), and SSPs with dysplasia (30 vs. 1). CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized controlled setting, the detection rate of high-risk SSPs was significantly higher with colonoscopy than CTC. These results might have implications for CTC as a CRC modality for opportunistic screening in average-risk adults.
引用
收藏
页码:516 / 522
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Medicare cost of colorectal cancer screening: CT colonography vs. optical colonoscopy
    Pyenson, Bruce
    Pickhardt, Perry J.
    Sawhney, Tia Goss
    Berrios, Michele
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2015, 40 (08): : 2966 - 2976
  • [42] Medicare cost of colorectal cancer screening: CT colonography vs. optical colonoscopy
    Bruce Pyenson
    Perry J. Pickhardt
    Tia Goss Sawhney
    Michele Berrios
    Abdominal Imaging, 2015, 40 : 2966 - 2976
  • [43] High performance automated detection of colonic polyps in CT colonography
    Yoshida, H
    Nappi, JJ
    MacEneaney, PM
    Rubin, D
    Dachman, AH
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 306 - 306
  • [44] Prevalence, distribution and risk of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps at a center with a high adenoma detection rate and experienced pathologists
    IJspeert, Joep E. G.
    de Wit, Koos
    van der Vlugt, Manon
    Bastiaansen, Barbara A. J.
    Fockens, Paul
    Dekker, Evelien
    ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 48 (08) : 740 - 746
  • [45] Patient and Provider Risk Factors for Sessile Serrated Polyp and Adenoma Detection on Screening Colonoscopy
    Zhou, Margaret
    Krigel, Anna
    Lebwohl, Benjamin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 114 : S146 - S146
  • [46] PREVALENCE OF HIGH-RISK SERRATED LESIONS IN A LARGE COLONOSCOPY COHORT
    Zhang, Lulu
    Jones, Michael
    Bettington, Mark
    Tutticci, Nicholas
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2024, 99 (06) : AB485 - AB485
  • [47] Detection of high-risk polyps at screening colonoscopy indicates risk for liver and biliary cancer death
    Zessner-Spitzenberg, Jasmin
    Ferlitsch, Arnulf
    Waldmann, Elisabeth
    Jiricka, Lena
    Rockenbauer, Lisa-Maria
    Hinterberger, Anna
    Majcher, Barbara
    Asaturi, Arno
    Trauner, Michael
    Ferlitsch, Monika
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2024, 56 (03) : 502 - 508
  • [48] CpG Island Methylation in Sessile Serrated Adenoma/Polyp of the Colorectum: Implications for Differential Diagnosis of Molecularly High-Risk Lesions among Non-dysplastic Sessile Serrated Adenomas/Polyps
    Lee, Ji Ae
    Park, Hye Eun
    Yoo, Seung-Yeon
    Jeong, Seorin
    Cho, Nam-Yun
    Kang, Gyeong Hoon
    Kim, Jung Ho
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY AND TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2019, 53 (04) : 225 - 235
  • [49] Improving sessile serrated adenoma detection rates with high definition colonoscopy: A retrospective study
    Sehgal, Abhinav
    Aggarwal, Soorya
    Mandaliya, Rohan
    Loughney, Thomas
    Mattar, Mark C.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 14 (04): : 226 - 234
  • [50] Deep learning of contrast-coated serrated polyps for computer-aided detection in CT colonography
    Nappi, Janne J.
    Pickhardt, Perry
    Kim, David H.
    Hironaka, Toru
    Yoshida, Hiroyuki
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2017: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, 2017, 10134