CT-Colonography vs. Colonoscopy for Detection of High-Risk Sessile Serrated Polyps

被引:70
|
作者
IJspeert, J. E. G. [1 ]
Nolthenius, C. J. Tutein [2 ]
Kuipers, E. J. [3 ]
van Leerdam, M. E. [4 ]
Nio, C. Y. [2 ]
Thomeer, M. G. J. [5 ]
Biermann, K. [6 ]
van de Vijver, M. J. [7 ]
Dekker, E. [1 ]
Stoker, J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[7] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2016年 / 111卷 / 04期
关键词
SOCIETY-TASK-FORCE; COLORECTAL-CANCER; SURVEILLANCE; POLYPECTOMY; CLASSIFICATION; PREVALENCE; NEOPLASIA; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1038/ajg.2016.58
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Sessile serrated polyps (SSPs) are suggested to be the precursors of 15-30% of all colorectal cancers (CRCs). Therefore, CRC screening modalities should also be designed to detect high-risk SSPs. We compared computed tomography colonography (CTC) with colonoscopy-based screening for the detection of high-risk SSPs in average-risk individuals. METHODS: Data from a randomized controlled trial that compared CTC with colonoscopy for population screening were used for the analysis. Individuals diagnosed at CTC with a lesion >= 10 mm in size were referred for colonoscopy. Individuals with only 6-9 mm lesions were offered surveillance CTC. This surveillance CTC was followed by a colonoscopy when a lesion >= 6 mm was detected. Yield of both was accumulated to mimic current American College of Radiology CTC referral strategy (referral of individuals with any lesion >= 6 mm). Per participant detection of >= 1 high-risk (dysplastic and/or = 10 mm) SSP was compared with colonoscopy using multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: In total, 8,844 individuals were invited to participate (in 2: 1 allocation), of which 1,276 colonoscopy and 982 CTC invitees participated in the study. In the colonoscopy arm, 4.3% of individuals were diagnosed with >= 1 high-risk SSP, compared with 0.8% in the CTC arm (odds ratio (OR) 5.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6-11.6; P<0.001). In total, 3.1% of individuals in the colonoscopy arm were diagnosed with high-risk SSPs as most advanced lesion, compared with 0.4% in the CTC arm (OR 7.7; 95% CI 2.7-21.6; P<0.001). The current CTC strategy showed a marked lower detection for especially fl at high-risk SSPs (17 vs. 0), high-risk SSP located in the proximal colon (32 vs. 1), and SSPs with dysplasia (30 vs. 1). CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized controlled setting, the detection rate of high-risk SSPs was significantly higher with colonoscopy than CTC. These results might have implications for CTC as a CRC modality for opportunistic screening in average-risk adults.
引用
收藏
页码:516 / 522
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CT-Colonography Versus Colonoscopy for Detection of High-Risk Sessile Serrated Polyps
    IJspeert, Joep
    Nolthenius, Charlotte Tutein
    Kuipers, Ernst J.
    van Leerdam, Monique
    Nio, Yung
    Thomeer, Maarten
    Biermann, Katharina
    van de Vijver, M.
    Dekker, Evelien
    Stoker, Jaap
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 150 (04) : S752 - S753
  • [2] Detection of High-Risk Sessile Serrated Lesions: Multitarget Stool DNA Versus CT Colonography
    Deiss-Yehiely, Nimrod
    Graffy, Peter M.
    Weigman, Benjamin
    Hassan, Cesare
    Matkowskyj, Kristina A.
    Pickhardt, Perry J.
    Weiss, Jennifer M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2022, 218 (04) : 670 - 676
  • [3] Colorectal Carcinoma Cost-Effectiveness of CT-Colonography vs. optical Colonoscopy
    Lichert, Frank
    GESUNDHEITSOEKONOMIE UND QUALITAETSMANAGEMENT, 2014, 19 (02): : 38 - 38
  • [4] Features associated with high-risk sessile serrated polyps at index and follow-up colonoscopy
    Anwar, Shahzaib
    Cock, Charles
    Young, Joanne
    Young, Graeme P.
    Meng, Rosie
    Simpson, Kalindra
    Coats, Michelle
    Huang, Junming
    Bampton, Peter
    Fraser, Robert
    Symonds, Erin L.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 36 (06) : 1620 - 1626
  • [5] Editorial Comment: Improving Awareness and Identification of High-Risk Sessile Serrated Lesions at CT Colonography
    Ballard, David H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2022, 218 (04) : 677 - 677
  • [6] One Third of Large Sessile Serrated Polyps Are Missed on CT Colonography
    Singla, Manish B.
    Kemp, Jean D.
    Cirigliano, Vito V.
    Bobele, Gilda M.
    Goldberg, Michael E.
    Maydonovitch, Corinne
    Veerappan, Ganesh R.
    Young, Patrick E.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 148 (04) : S111 - S112
  • [7] Colon capsule endoscopy vs CT-colonography in the evaluation of patients with incomplete colonoscopy
    Spada, Cristiano
    Hassan, Cesare
    Grazioli, Leonardo Minelli
    Cesaro, Paola
    Barbaro, Brunella
    Iafrate, Franco
    Petruzziello, Lucio
    Laghi, Andrea
    Bonomo, Lorenzo
    Costamagna, Guido
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 28 : 31 - 32
  • [8] RISK FACTORS FOR ADENOMATOUS POLYPS, HYPERPLASTIC POLYPS AND SESSILE SERRATED POLYPS IN A SCREENING COLONOSCOPY STUDY
    Rifkin, Samara
    Tabisz, Brent
    Spence, Emma
    Drewes, Julia L.
    McMann, Madison
    Stevens, Courtney
    Gills, Joell L.
    Kafonek, David
    Cromwell, David
    Bedine, Marshall
    Mullin, Gerard
    Gonzalez-Velez, Eduardo
    Veloso, Hazel Marie Galon
    La Luna, Louis
    Schearer, Pamela
    Gerhart, Stacy
    Schiller, Amy L.
    Hylind, Linda
    Giardiello, Francis
    Sears, Cynthia L.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (06) : S581 - S581
  • [9] Impact of Fellow Involvement on Detection of Sessile Serrated Polyps During Colonoscopy
    Bassi, Mehak
    Alcade, Beatriz Gros
    Garg, Archit
    Santharaman, Aadhithyaraman
    Bidani, Khyati
    Rani, Richa
    Bhatia, Mannat Kaur
    Korman, Andrew
    Velpari, Sugirdhana
    Broder, Arkady
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 119 (10S): : S635 - S636
  • [10] SESSILE SERRATED ADENOMA ON INDEX COLONOSCOPY IS NOT A RISK FACTOR FOR METACHRONOUS HIGH-RISK ADENOMA
    Geng, Zhuo
    Torrealba, Mauricio
    Rodin, Holly
    Brosam, Aaron
    Farah, Khalil
    Ashhab, Ashraf
    Campos, Marilia
    Calderon, Fiorela
    Shaukat, Aasma
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 89 (06) : AB384 - AB385