Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Omalizumab in the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

被引:37
|
作者
Yu, Chenjie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Kaijian [2 ]
Cui, Xinyan [4 ]
Lu, Ling [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dong, Jianfei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Maohua [5 ]
Gao, Xia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Jiangsu Prov Key Med Discipline, Affiliated Drum Tower Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol,Med Sch, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Drum Tower Clin Med Coll, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Drum Tower Hosp, Res Inst Otorhinolaryngol, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[5] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Changsha 410000, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
omalizumab; anti-IgE; allergic rhinitis; meta-analysis; immunotherapy; ANTI-IGE; COMBINATION TREATMENT; RUSH IMMUNOTHERAPY; ASTHMA; CHILDREN; THERAPY; ADOLESCENTS; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1177/1945892419884774
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background Patients with moderate to severe allergic rhinitis (AR) who are treated according to the current rhinitis management guidelines may be inadequately controlled. These patients are at risk of serious comorbidities, such as asthma and chronic sinusitis. These symptoms, sneezing and an itchy, runny, stuffy nose, may have a negative impact on patients' daily functioning. Omalizumab is being developed as a new choice for the treatment of AR. We therefore undertook a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of omalizumab in the treatment of AR. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE databases for randomized controlled studies on the treatment of AR with omalizumab. Our evaluation outcomes were symptom scores, medication efficacy, combined symptom and medication scores, and adverse events. We descriptively summarized and quantitatively synthesized original data to evaluate the efficacy and safety of omalizumab in the treatment of AR by using Stata12.0 software for meta-analyses. Results The results of our meta-analysis showed that there were statistically significant differences between the omalizumab group and the control group in the following aspects: daily nasal symptom score (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.443, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.538 to -0.347, P < .001); daily ocular symptom score (SMD = -0.385, 95% CI: -0.5 to -0.269, P < .001); daily nasal medication symptom scores (SMD = -0.421, 95% CI: -0.591 to -0.251, P < .001); proportion of days of emergency drug use (risk ratio [RR] = 0.488, 95% CI: 0.307 to 0.788, P < .005); rhinoconjunctivitis-specific quality of life questionnaire (SMD = -0.286, 95% CI: -0.418 to -0.154, P < .001); and overall evaluation (RR = 1.435, 95% CI: 1.303-1.582, P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in safety indicator: adverse events (RR = 1.026, 95% CI: 0.916-1.150, P = .655). Conclusion Omalizumab is effective and relatively safe in patients with AR; omalizumab used in conjunction with special immunotherapy has shown promising results, especially in reducing adverse events.
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 208
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Omalizumab for the Treatment of Inadequately Controlled Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Tsabouri, Sophia
    Tseretopoulou, Xanthippi
    Priftis, Konstantinos
    Ntzani, Evangelia E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2014, 2 (03): : 332 - +
  • [2] Effects of Probiotics on Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Farahmandi, Kajal
    Mohr, Alex E.
    McFarland, Lynne, V
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2022, 36 (04) : 440 - 450
  • [3] Guominjian for allergic rhinitis A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Xiong, Yimin
    Li, Haoran
    Zhang, Shu-Nan
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (44) : E22854
  • [4] Omalizumab-related adverse events in clinical trials of allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tsabouri, S.
    Tseretopoulou, X.
    Priftis, K.
    Ntzani, E.
    [J]. ALLERGY, 2011, 66 : 626 - 627
  • [5] Omalizumab for the treatment of allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tsabouri, Sophia
    Ntritsos, Georgios
    Koskeridis, Fotios
    Evangelou, Evangelos
    Olsson, Petter
    Kostikas, Konstantinos
    [J]. RHINOLOGY, 2021, 59 (06) : 501 - +
  • [6] Efficacy of omalizumab for the treatment of inadequately controlled allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tsabouri, S.
    Tseretopoulou, X.
    Priftis, K.
    Ntzani, E. Patel
    [J]. ALLERGY, 2012, 67 : 332 - 333
  • [7] Efficacy and safety of acupoint application for allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    SHEN Mengxia
    SHANG Wenfang
    WU Jiangxia
    YU Zelin
    XUAN Lihua
    [J]. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2022, 42 (06) : 858 - 868
  • [8] Efficacy and safety of acupoint application for allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Mengxia, Shen
    Wenfang, Shang
    Jiangxia, Wu
    Zelin, Yu
    Lihua, Xuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE, 2022, 42 (06) : 858 - 868
  • [9] Efficacy and Safety of Mipomersen: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Fogacci, Federica
    Ferri, Nicola
    Toth, Peter P.
    Ruscica, Massimiliano
    Corsini, Alberto
    Cicero, Arrigo F. G.
    [J]. DRUGS, 2019, 79 (07) : 751 - 766
  • [10] Efficacy and Safety of Mipomersen: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Federica Fogacci
    Nicola Ferri
    Peter P. Toth
    Massimiliano Ruscica
    Alberto Corsini
    Arrigo F. G. Cicero
    [J]. Drugs, 2019, 79 : 751 - 766