Efficacy and Safety of Mipomersen: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

被引:93
|
作者
Fogacci, Federica [1 ]
Ferri, Nicola [2 ]
Toth, Peter P. [3 ,4 ]
Ruscica, Massimiliano [5 ]
Corsini, Alberto [5 ,6 ]
Cicero, Arrigo F. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Med & Surg Sci Dept, Via Albertoni 15, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Padua, Drug Sci Dept, Padua, Italy
[3] CGH Med Ctr, Sterling, IL USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Ciccarone Ctr Prevent Cardiovasc Dis, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Univ Milan, Pharmacol & Biomol Sci Dept, Milan, Italy
[6] IRCCS Multimed, Milan, Italy
关键词
HOMOZYGOUS FAMILIAL HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA; DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL; TRIGLYCERIDE TRANSFER PROTEIN; B SYNTHESIS INHIBITOR; APOLIPOPROTEIN-B; ANTISENSE INHIBITOR; DOUBLE-BLIND; CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS; LDL-CHOLESTEROL; OPEN-LABEL;
D O I
10.1007/s40265-019-01114-z
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
AimOur aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of mipomersen through a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis of the available clinical studies.MethodsA systematic literature search in SCOPUS, PubMed Medline, ISI Web of Science and Google Scholar databases was conducted up to January 20, 2019, in order to identify clinical trials assessing the effect of mipomersen on lipoproteins, and the safety profile of mipomersen. Effect sizes for lipid changes were expressed as weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). For safety analysis, odd ratios (OR) and 95% CI were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Data were pooled from 13 clinical studies comprising 49 arms, which included 1053 subjects overall, with 729 in the active-treated arm and 324 in the control arm.ResultsMeta-analysis of data suggested that mipomersen significantly reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (WMD -1.52, 95% CI -1.85 to -1.19; p<0.001), total cholesterol (WMD -1.55, 95% CI -1.97 to -1.13; p<0.001), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) (WMD -1.66, 95% CI -2.06 to -1.27; p<0.001), lipoprotein(a) (WMD -0.99, 95% CI -1.37 to -0.62; p<0.001), apolipoprotein B (WMD -1.66, 95% CI -2.04 to -1.27; p<0.001), triglycerides (WMD -0.61, 95% CI -0.76 to -0.46, p<0.001), very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (WMD -0.58, 95% CI -0.73 to -0.43; p<0.001) and apolipoprotein A-I (WMD -0.25, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.001; p=0.049) without affecting HDL-C levels (WMD 0.11, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.26; p=0.124). However, treatment with mipomersen was positively associated with an increased risk of discontinuation of treatment (OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.96-4.65; p<0.001), injection-site reaction (OR 11.41, 95% CI 7.88-16.52; p<0.001), hepatic steatosis (OR 4.96, 95% CI 1.99-12.39; p=0.001), hepatic enzymes elevation (OR 3.61, 95% CI 2.09-6.24; p<0.001) and flu-like symptoms (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.45-2.81; p<0.001).ConclusionDespite favourable effects on the lipid profile, some concerns are reinforced from the safety profile. As a matter of fact, mipomersen therapy is more likely discontinued and associated with increased risk of injection-site reactions, hepatic steatosis, hepatic enzyme elevation, and flu-like symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:751 / 766
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and Safety of Mipomersen: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Federica Fogacci
    Nicola Ferri
    Peter P. Toth
    Massimiliano Ruscica
    Alberto Corsini
    Arrigo F. G. Cicero
    [J]. Drugs, 2019, 79 : 751 - 766
  • [2] Efficacy and safety of mipomersen in treatment of dyslipidemia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Panta, Raju
    Dahal, Khagendra
    Kunwar, Sumit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LIPIDOLOGY, 2015, 9 (02) : 217 - 225
  • [3] Efficacy and Safety of Mipomersen in Treatment of Dyslipidemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Panta, Raju
    Dahal, Khagendra
    [J]. ENDOCRINE REVIEWS, 2014, 35 (03)
  • [4] Efficacy and safety of berberine for dyslipidaemias: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Ju Jianqing
    Li Jingen
    Lin Qian
    Xu Hao
    [J]. PHYTOMEDICINE, 2018, 50 : 25 - 34
  • [5] Erenumab safety and efficacy in migraine A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Zhu, Changyu
    Guan, Jianmei
    Xiao, Hua
    Luo, Weinan
    Tong, Rongsheng
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (52)
  • [6] Erenumab safety and efficacy in migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Zhu, Changyu
    Tong, Rongsheng
    Guan, Jianmei
    Xiao, Hua
    Luo, Weinan
    [J]. PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2019, 107 : 40 - 40
  • [7] Efficacy and safety of bimekizumab for the treatment of psoriasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Qiu, Yuanyuan
    Zhu, Yang
    Liu, Yun
    Liu, Qiliang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT, 2023, 34 (01)
  • [8] Dupilumab safety and efficacy in uncontrolled asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Zayed, Yazan
    Kheiri, Babikir
    Banifadel, Momen
    Hicks, Michael
    Aburahma, Ahmed
    Hamid, Kewan
    Bachuwa, Ghassan
    Chandran, Arul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASTHMA, 2019, 56 (10) : 1110 - 1119
  • [9] Efficacy and Safety of Systemic Corticosteroids for Urticaria: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Chu, Xiajing
    Wang, Jason
    Ologundudu, Leonardo
    Brignardello-Petersen, Romina
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    Oykhman, Paul
    Bernstein, Jonathan A.
    Saini, Sarbjit S.
    Beck, Lisa A.
    Waserman, Susan
    Moellman, Joseph
    Khan, Dave A.
    Ben-Shoshan, Moshe
    Baker, Diane R.
    Oliver, Eric T.
    Sheikh, Javed
    Lang, David
    Mathur, Sameer K.
    Winders, Tonya
    Eftekhari, Sanaz
    Gardner, Donna D.
    Runyon, Lauren
    Asiniwasis, Rachel N.
    Cole, Emily F.
    Chan, Jeffrey
    Wheeler, Kathryn E.
    Trayes, Kathryn P.
    Tran, Paul
    Chu, Derek K.
    Jackson, David J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2024, 12 (07):
  • [10] Efficacy and Safety of Telavancin in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Polyzos, Konstantinos A.
    Mavros, Michael N.
    Vardakas, Konstantinos Z.
    Makris, Marinos C.
    Rafailidis, Petros I.
    Falagas, Matthew E.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (08):