Erenumab safety and efficacy in migraine A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

被引:34
|
作者
Zhu, Changyu [1 ]
Guan, Jianmei [2 ]
Xiao, Hua [3 ,4 ]
Luo, Weinan [3 ,4 ]
Tong, Rongsheng [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sichuan Acad Med Sci & Sichuan Prov Peoples Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Pharm, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Acad Med Sci & Sichuan Prov Peoples Hosp, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Acad Med Sci & Sichuan Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Pharm, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Acad Med Sci & Sichuan Prov Peoples Hosp, Personalized Drug Therapy Key Lab Sichuan Prov, 32,West Sect 2,1st Ring Rd, Chengdu 610072, Peoples R China
关键词
chronic migraine; episodic migraine; erenumab; meta-analysis; RCTs; EPISODIC MIGRAINE; DOUBLE-BLIND; PREVENTIVE TREATMENT; AMG; 334; HEALTHY; HUMANS;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000018483
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Erenumab is a new medicine recently approved in the United States of America for the preventive treatment of migraine among adults. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis and evaluation of the efficacy and safety of erenumab among patients with migraine. Methods: The electronic databases that were searched comprised PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library, which were independently retrieved by 2 reviewers. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared placebo with erenumab were selected. Mean differences (MDs), pooled risk ratios (RRs), and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for continuous and dichotomous data, respectively. Results: Five RCTs representing 2928 patients were included. Pooled analysis showed significant reductions in the 50% responder rate (RR 1.55; P < .00001; I-2 =49%). In addition, the mean monthly migraine days from baseline in the erenumab group compared with placebo (MD-1.32; P < .00001; I-2 =100%) and migraine-specific medication days) from baseline (MD-1.41; P < .00001; I-2 = 100%) were significantly decreased for the erenumab group as compared with placebo. Furthermore, Migraine-specific medication days from baseline in the 140 mg erenumab group were significantly reduced as compared the 70 mg group (MD = 0.55; P < .00001; I-2 = 90%). Finally, there was no significant difference between the erenumab group and placebo for any adverse event and serious adverse event. Conclusion: Among patients with migraine, both 70 and 140 mg of erenumab were associated with reduced Migraine-specific medication days, Migraine-specific medication days from baseline, and an increased rate of a 50% reduction, in the absence of an increased risk of any serious adverse effect.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Erenumab safety and efficacy in migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Zhu, Changyu
    Tong, Rongsheng
    Guan, Jianmei
    Xiao, Hua
    Luo, Weinan
    [J]. PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2019, 107 : 40 - 40
  • [2] Different dosage regimens of erenumab for the treatment of migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of randomized controlled trials
    Gui, Tiantian
    Li, Hao
    Zhu, Feng
    Wang, Quan
    Zhou, Xiaoling
    Xue, Qun
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2022, 62 (10): : 1281 - 1292
  • [3] Erenumab for Preventive Treatment of Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety
    Lattanzi, Simona
    Brigo, Francesco
    Trinka, Eugen
    Vernieri, Fabrizio
    Corradetti, Tommaso
    Dobran, Mauro
    Silvestrini, Mauro
    [J]. DRUGS, 2019, 79 (04) : 417 - 431
  • [4] Erenumab for Preventive Treatment of Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety
    Simona Lattanzi
    Francesco Brigo
    Eugen Trinka
    Fabrizio Vernieri
    Tommaso Corradetti
    Mauro Dobran
    Mauro Silvestrini
    [J]. Drugs, 2019, 79 : 417 - 431
  • [5] Safety of Onabotulinumtoxin A in Chronic Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Corasaniti, Maria Tiziana
    Bagetta, Giacinto
    Nicotera, Pierluigi
    Tarsitano, Assunta
    Tonin, Paolo
    Sandrini, Giorgio
    Lawrence, Gary W.
    Scuteri, Damiana
    [J]. TOXINS, 2023, 15 (05)
  • [6] Efficacy and Safety of Mipomersen: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Fogacci, Federica
    Ferri, Nicola
    Toth, Peter P.
    Ruscica, Massimiliano
    Corsini, Alberto
    Cicero, Arrigo F. G.
    [J]. DRUGS, 2019, 79 (07) : 751 - 766
  • [7] Efficacy and Safety of Mipomersen: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Federica Fogacci
    Nicola Ferri
    Peter P. Toth
    Massimiliano Ruscica
    Alberto Corsini
    Arrigo F. G. Cicero
    [J]. Drugs, 2019, 79 : 751 - 766
  • [8] Efficacy and safety of berberine for dyslipidaemias: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Ju Jianqing
    Li Jingen
    Lin Qian
    Xu Hao
    [J]. PHYTOMEDICINE, 2018, 50 : 25 - 34
  • [9] Efficacy and safety of bimekizumab for the treatment of psoriasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Qiu, Yuanyuan
    Zhu, Yang
    Liu, Yun
    Liu, Qiliang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT, 2023, 34 (01)
  • [10] Dupilumab safety and efficacy in uncontrolled asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Zayed, Yazan
    Kheiri, Babikir
    Banifadel, Momen
    Hicks, Michael
    Aburahma, Ahmed
    Hamid, Kewan
    Bachuwa, Ghassan
    Chandran, Arul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASTHMA, 2019, 56 (10) : 1110 - 1119