Solute changes during aquifer storage recovery testing in a limestone clastic aquifer

被引:28
|
作者
Mirecki, JE [1 ]
Campbell, BG
Conlon, KJ
Petkewich, MD
机构
[1] Univ Charleston, Dept Geol, Charleston, SC 29424 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Div Water Resources, Sullivans Isl, SC 29482 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-6584.1998.tb02809.x
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Aquifer storage recovery (ASR) was tested in the Santee Limestone/Black Mingo Aquifer near Charleston, South Carolina, to assess the feasibility for subsurface storage of treated drinking water. Water quality data obtained during two representative ASR tests were interpreted to show three things: (1) recovery efficiency of ASR in this geological setting; (2) possible changes in physical characteristics of the aquifer during ASR testing; and (3) water quality changes and potability of recovered water during short (one-and six-day) storage durations in the predominantly carbonate aquifer. Recovery efficiency for both ASR tests reported here was 54%, Successive ASR tests increased aquifer permeability of the Santee Limestone/Black Mingo Aquifer, It is likely that aquifer permeability increased during short storage periods due to dissolution of carbonate minerals and amorphous silica in aquifer material by treated drinking water. Dissolution resulted in an estimated 0.3% increase in pore volume of the permeable zones. Ground water composition generally evolved from a sodium-calcium bicarbonate water to a sodium chloride water during storage and recovery. After short duration, stored water can exceed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency maximum contaminant level (MCL) for chloride (250 mg/L), However, sulfate, fluoride, and trihalomethane concentrations remained below MCLs during storage and recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:394 / 403
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Arsenic release from Floridan Aquifer rock during incubations simulating aquifer storage and recovery operations
    Jin, Jin
    Zimmerman, Andrew R.
    Norton, Stuart B.
    Annable, Michael D.
    Harris, Willie G.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 551 : 238 - 245
  • [22] APPLICATION OF LEAKY AQUIFER THEORY TO TESTING OF AQUIFER GAS STORAGE PROSPECTS
    WITHERSP.PA
    NEUMAN, SP
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 1971, 23 (FEB): : 210 - &
  • [23] Aquifer Storage Recovery (ASR) of chlorinated municipal drinking water in a confined aquifer
    Izbicki, John A.
    Petersen, Christen E.
    Glotzbach, Kenneth J.
    Metzger, Loren F.
    Christensen, Allen H.
    Smith, Gregory A.
    O'Leary, David
    Fram, Miranda S.
    Joseph, Trevor
    Shannon, Heather
    APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY, 2010, 25 (08) : 1133 - 1152
  • [24] Hydrogeochemical Evaluation of Aquifer Storage and Recovery in Edwards Aquifer, New Braunfels, Texas
    Simbo, Christophe Wakamya
    GROUNDWATER, 2024, 62 (04) : 560 - 577
  • [25] Aquifer pre-oxidation using permanganate to mitigate water quality deterioration during aquifer storage and recovery
    Antoniou, E. A.
    Hartog, N.
    van Breukelen, B. M.
    Stuyfzand, P. J.
    APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY, 2014, 50 : 25 - 36
  • [26] Stochasting modeling of virus transport and removal during aquifer storage and recovery
    Torkzaban S.
    Hocking M.
    Bradford S.A.
    Tazehkand S.S.
    Sasidharan S.
    Šimůnek J.
    Journal of Hydrology, 2019, 578
  • [27] EXAMINING THE IMPACT OF AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY ON DBPS
    SINGER, PC
    PYNE, RDG
    AVS, M
    MILLER, CT
    MOJONNIER, C
    JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 1993, 85 (11): : 85 - 94
  • [28] Control of saltwater intrusion by aquifer storage and recovery
    Hussain, Mohammed S.
    Javadi, Akbar A.
    Sherif, Mohsen M.
    Naseri-Karim-Vand, Reza
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-ENGINEERING AND COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2016, 169 (03) : 148 - 155
  • [30] Aquifer storage and recovery in the Edwards Aquifers, Texas
    Deeds N.E.
    Blumberg F.
    Memoir of the Geological Society of America, 2019, 215 : 253 - 258