Evaluation of a disposable device for patient-controlled epidural analgesia after caesarean section

被引:3
|
作者
Kee, WDN
Lam, KK
Twyford, CJ
Gin, T
机构
关键词
pain; postoperative; equipment; epidural; patient controlled analgesia; analgesics; pethidine;
D O I
10.1177/0310057X9602400109
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We evaluated a disposable device (Baxter PCA Infusor) for patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) using pethidine in twenty women after lower segment caesarean section. Efficacy, as measured by visual analogue pain scores, was comparable with historical controls from PCEA studies using electronic devices. Three patients reported inadequate analgesia, attributable in two cases to problems with the epidural catheter. PCEA was stopped in one patient because of side-effects. Pethidine consumption ranged from 125 to 1500 mg (median 575 mg) in 48 hours. Plasma concentrations of pethidine varied widely. Disposable devices for PCEA after caesarean section provide an alternative to bolus administration or PCEA using more expensive and cumbersome electronic devices, although we suggest currently available apparatus requires modifications to improve clinical performance.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 55
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Labor analgesia: Comparison of epidural patient-controlled analgesia and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia
    Sugur, Tayfun
    Kizilates, Esra
    Kizilates, Ali
    Inanoglu, Kerem
    Karsli, Bilge
    AGRI-THE JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF ALGOLOGY, 2020, 32 (01): : 8 - 18
  • [22] Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with tramadol and lornoxicam after thoracotomy A comparison with patient-controlled epidural analgesia
    Jin, Juying
    Min, Su
    Chen, Qibin
    Zhang, Dong
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (07)
  • [23] Patient-controlled epidural fentanyl following spinal fentanyl at Caesarean section
    Cooper, DW
    Garcia, E
    Mowbray, P
    Millar, MA
    ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 57 (03) : 266 - 270
  • [24] Postoperative analgesia after major spine surgery:: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia
    Schenk, Michael R.
    Putzier, Michael
    Kuegler, Bjoern
    Tohtz, Stephan
    Voigt, Kristina
    Schink, Tania
    Kox, Wolfgang J.
    Spies, Claudia
    Volk, Thomas
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2006, 103 (05): : 1311 - 1317
  • [25] Patient-controlled analgesia following caesarean section: a comparison of morphine and meptazinol
    James, KS
    Davidson, IT
    McGrady, E
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 1997, 6 (02) : 93 - 96
  • [26] Patient-controlled oral analgesia versus nurse-controlled parenteral analgesia after caesarean section: a randomised controlled trial
    Bonnal, A.
    Dehon, A.
    Nagot, N.
    Macioce, V.
    Nogue, E.
    Morau, E.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 71 (05) : 535 - 543
  • [27] Patient-controlled epidural analgesia following caesarean delivery: A comparison of pethidine and fentanyl
    Goh, JL
    Evans, SF
    Pavy, TJG
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1996, 24 (01) : 45 - 50
  • [28] A randomised controlled trial of parecoxib, celecoxib and paracetamol as adjuncts to patient-controlled epidural analgesia after caesarean delivery
    Paech, M. J.
    McDonnell, N. J.
    Sinha, A.
    Baber, C.
    Nathan, E. A.
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2014, 42 (01) : 15 - 22
  • [29] EPIDURAL PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA - AN ALTERNATIVE TO INTRAVENOUS PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA FOR PAIN RELIEF AFTER CESAREAN DELIVERY
    PARKER, RK
    WHITE, PF
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1992, 75 (02): : 245 - 251
  • [30] Solutions for patient-controlled epidural analgesia
    Paech, Michael
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2006, 15 (03) : 262 - 262