Comparison of treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: A prospective Cohort Study

被引:8
|
作者
Demetrashvili, Zaza [1 ,2 ]
Kenchadze, George [2 ,3 ]
Pipia, Irakli [2 ,3 ]
Khutsishvili, Kakhi [2 ]
Loladze, David [2 ]
Ekaladze, Eka [4 ]
Merabishvili, Giorgi [1 ,2 ]
Kamkamidze, George [5 ]
机构
[1] Tbilisi State Med Univ, Dept Surg, 33 Vazha Pshavelaave, Tbilisi 0177, Georgia
[2] Kipshidze Cent Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, 29 Vazha Pshavelaave, Tbilisi 0160, Georgia
[3] Ilia State Univ, Inst Med Res, 3-5 Cholokashviliave, Tbilisi 0162, Georgia
[4] Tbilisi State Med Univ, Dept Biochem, 33 Vazha Pshavelaave, Tbilisi 0177, Georgia
[5] Univ Georgia, Dept Immunol & Infect Dis, 47 Tashkenti Str, Tbilisi 0160, Georgia
来源
关键词
Acute appendicitis; Appendiceal mass; Appendiceal abscess; Appendectomy; INTERVAL APPENDECTOMY; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.amsu.2019.10.016
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of our prospective study is to compare and analyze the results of two treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: emergency surgery and conservative treatment with and without interval surgery. Materials and methods: 74 Patients with the diagnosis of appendiceal mass or abscess were enrolled in this study. The patients were assigned into two groups: the emergency surgery group and the conservative management group. The conservative management group was subdivided into two groups: interval surgery group and the ambulatory follow-up observation group without interval surgery. Several clinical characteristics were determined and compared between the groups. Among patients who underwent surgery, the surgical methods, operation time, postoperative hospitalization period, and post-surgical complications were analyzed. In the ambulatory follow-up observation group, recurrence of appendicitis was assessed. Results: Comparison of the emergency surgery group and interval surgery group revealed that the interval surgery group was characterized by shorter operation time (P = 0.008), a smallernumber of postoperative complications (P = 0.02) and also shorter postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.009). In the ambulatory follow-up observation group, recurrence of appendicitis developed in 3 (13%) patients. US or CT-guided PCD was performed in all 3 patients on the conservative treatment stage. Comparing the interval surgery and recurrent appendicitis groups revealed statistically significant difference: operation time (P = 0.04) as well as postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.04) were shorter in recurrent appendicitis group. In 3 (4.1%) patients, the cause of the appendiceal mass was caecal cancer (2 cases) and Crohn's disease. Conclusion: Conservative treatment without interval surgery seems to be the preferred method for treatment of appendiceal mass and abscess. Patients can be operated on only in case of recurrence of appendicitis. US or CT PCD of appendiceal abscess presents the risk-factor for the development of recurrence of appendicitis. CT and colonoscopy within 4-6 weeks after completing the conservative treatment is recommended to be performed in all patients.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 52
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Comparison of Recruitment Methods for a Prospective Cohort Study of Perinatal Psychoneuroimmunology among Black American Women
    Shannon L. Gillespie
    Journal of Urban Health, 2021, 98 : 115 - 122
  • [22] A Comparison of Recruitment Methods for a Prospective Cohort Study of Perinatal Psychoneuroimmunology among Black American Women
    Gillespie, Shannon L.
    JOURNAL OF URBAN HEALTH-BULLETIN OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE, 2021, 98 (SUPPL 2): : 115 - 122
  • [23] PERITONSILLAR ABSCESS - PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF PATHOGENS, TREATMENT, AND MORBIDITY
    MULLER, SP
    EAR NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL, 1978, 57 (10): : 439 - &
  • [24] Interval appendicectomy after appendiceal mass or abscess in adults: What is "best practice"?
    Corfield, Lorraine
    SURGERY TODAY, 2007, 37 (01) : 1 - 4
  • [25] Peritonsillar abscess may not always be a complication of acute tonsillitis: A prospective cohort study
    Sanmark, Enni
    Wiksten, Johanna
    Valimaa, Hannamari
    Aaltonen, Leena-Maija
    Ilmarinen, Taru
    Blomgren, Karin
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (04):
  • [26] Risk Factors of Recurrent Appendiceal Abscess After Initial Nonsurgical Treatment Without Drainage of Children With Appendiceal Abscess: A Single Center Retrospective Review
    Luo, PengCheng
    Wang, DengLiang
    Kang, Quan
    SURGICAL INFECTIONS, 2022, 23 (10) : 887 - 892
  • [27] Interval Appendicectomy After Appendiceal Mass or Abscess in Adults: What is “Best Practice”?
    Lorraine Corfield
    Surgery Today, 2007, 37 : 1 - 4
  • [28] Efficacy of Metronidazole in the Conservative Treatment for Appendiceal Mass
    Ogata, Seiya
    Shimizu, Hirofumi
    Machino, Kakeru
    Kakuta, Keiichi
    Mimori, Kotaro
    Minami, Yosuke
    Goto, Yudai
    Yamashita, Michitoshi
    Tanaka, Hideaki
    JOURNAL OF CHILD SCIENCE, 2024, 14 (01): : e59 - e65
  • [29] Treatment of liver abscess: prospective randomized comparison of catheter drainage and needle aspiration
    Singh, Sukhjeet
    Chaudhary, Poras
    Saxena, Neeraj
    Khandelwal, Sachin
    Poddar, Deva Datta
    Biswal, Upendra C.
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 26 (04): : 332 - 339
  • [30] Treatment of appendiceal mass - a qualitative systematic review
    Olsen, Jesper
    Skovdal, Jan
    Qvist, Niels
    Bisgaard, Thue
    DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 61 (08):