Pre-emptive and preventive NSAIDs for postoperative pain in adults undergoing all types of surgery

被引:71
|
作者
Doleman, Brett [1 ]
Leonardi-Bee, Jo [2 ]
Heinink, Thomas P. [3 ]
Boyd-Carson, Hannah [4 ]
Carrick, Laura [5 ]
Mandalia, Rahil [6 ]
Lund, Jon N. [7 ]
Williams, John P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Med, Dept Surg & Anaesthesia, Div Med Sci & Grad Entry Med, Derby, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Ctr Evidence Based Healthcare, Div Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Clin Sci Bldg Phase 2, Nottingham, England
[3] Frimley Hlth NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Anaesthesia, Frimley Pk Hosp, Frimley, England
[4] Univ Nottingham, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Med Sci & Grad Entry Med, Derby, England
[5] Royal Derby Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Derby, England
[6] Univ Hosp Leicester, Dept Anaesthesia, Leicester, Leics, England
[7] Univ Nottingham, Sch Med, Div Hlth Sci, Derby, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
3RD MOLAR SURGERY; NONSTEROIDAL ANTIINFLAMMATORY DRUGS; DOUBLE-BLIND; ANALGESIC EFFICACY; META-REGRESSION; PARACETAMOL ACETAMINOPHEN; INTRAVENOUS FLURBIPROFEN; GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; MORPHINE CONSUMPTION;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD012978.pub2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Postoperative pain is a common consequence of surgery and can have many negative perioperative effects. It has been suggested that the administration of analgesia before a painful stimulus may improve pain control. We defined pre-emptive nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs) as those given before surgery but not continued afterwards and preventive NSAIDs as those given before surgery and continued afterwards. These were compared to a control group given the NSAIDs after surgery instead of before surgery. Objectives To assess the efficacy of preventive and pre-emptive NSAIDs for reducing postoperative pain in adults undergoing all types of surgery. Search methods We searched the following electronic databases: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, AMED and CINAHL (up to June 2020). In addition, we searched for unpublished studies in three clinical trial databases, conference proceedings, grey literature databases, and reference lists of retrieved articles. We did not apply any restrictions on language or date of publication. Selection criteria We included parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) only. We included adult participants undergoing any type of surgery. We defined pre-emptive NSAIDs as those given before surgery but not continued afterwards and preventive NSAIDs as those given before surgery and continued afterwards. These were compared to a control group given the NSAIDs after surgery instead of before surgery. We included studies that gave the medication by any route but not given on the skin. Data collection and analysis We used the standard methods expected by Cochrane, as well as a novel publication bias test developed by our research group. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome. Outcomes included acute postoperative pain (minimal clinically important difference (MCID): 1.5 on a 0-10 scale), adverse events of NSAIDs, nausea and vomiting, 24-hour morphine consumption (MCID: 10 mg reduction), time to analgesic request (MCID: one hour), pruritus, sedation, patient satisfaction, chronic pain and time to first bowel movement (MCID: 12 hours). Main results We included 71 RCTs. Seven studies are awaiting classification. We included 45 studies that evaluated pre-emptive NSAIDs and 26 studies that evaluated preventive NSAIDs. We considered only four studies to be at low risk of bias for most domains. The operations and NSAIDs used varied, although most studies were conducted in abdominal, orthopaedic and dental surgery. Most studies were conducted in secondary care and in low-risk participants. Common exclusions were participants on analgesic medications prior to surgery and those with chronic pain. Pre-emptive NSAIDs compared to post-incision NSAIDs For pre-emptive NSAIDs, there is probably a decrease in early acute postoperative pain (MD -0.69, 95% CI -0.97 to -0.41; studies = 36; participants = 2032; I-2 = 96%; moderate-certainty evidence). None of the included studies that reported on acute postoperative pain reported adverse events as an outcome. There may be little or no difference between the groups in short-term (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.34 to 2.94; studies = 2; participants = 100; I-2 = 0%; low-certainty evidence) or long-term nausea and vomiting (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.38; studies = 5; participants = 228; I-2 = 29%; low-certainty evidence). There may be a reduction in late acute postoperative pain (MD -0.22, 95% CI -0.44 to 0.00; studies = 28; participants = 1645; I-2 = 97%; low-certainty evidence). There may be a reduction in 24-hour morphine consumption with pre-emptive NSAIDs (MD -5.62 mg, 95% CI -9.00 mg to -2.24 mg; studies = 16; participants = 854; I-2 = 99%; low-certainty evidence) and an increase in the time to analgesic request (MD 17.04 minutes, 95% CI 3.77 minutes to 30.31 minutes; studies = 18; participants = 975; I-2 = 95%; low-certainty evidence). There may be little or no difference in opioid adverse events such as pruritus (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.09 to 1.76; studies = 4; participants = 254; I-2 = 0%; low-certainty evidence) or sedation (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.68; studies = 4; participants = 281; I-2 = 0%; low-certainty evidence), although the number of included studies for these outcomes was small. No study reported patient satisfaction, chronic pain or time to first bowel movement for pre-emptive NSAIDs. Preventive NSAIDs compared to post-incision NSAIDs For preventive NSAIDs, there may be little or no difference in early acute postoperative pain (MD -0.14, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.12; studies = 18; participants = 1140; I-2 = 75%; low-certainty evidence). One study reported adverse events from NSAIDs (reoperation for bleeding) although the events were low which did not allow any meaningful conclusions to be drawn (RR 1.95; 95% CI 0.18 to 20.68). There may be little or no difference in rates of short-term (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.49 to 3.30; studies = 1; participants = 76; low-certainty evidence) or long-term (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.38; studies = 5; participants = 456; I-2 = 29%; low-certainty evidence) nausea and vomiting. There may be a reduction in late acute postoperative pain (MD -0.33, 95% CI -0.59 to -0.07; studies = 21; participants = 1441; I-2 = 81%; low-certainty evidence). There is probably a reduction in 24-hour morphine consumption (MD -1.93 mg, 95% CI -3.55 mg to -0.32 mg; studies = 16; participants = 1323; I-2 = 49%; moderate-certainty evidence). It is uncertain if there is any difference in time to analgesic request (MD 8.51 minutes, 95% CI -31.24 minutes to 48.27 minutes; studies = 8; participants = 410; I-2 = 98%; very low-certainty evidence). As with pre-emptive NSAIDs, there may be little or no difference in other opioid adverse events such as pruritus (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.09 to 3.35; studies = 3; participants = 211; I-2 = 0%; low-certainty evidence) and sedation (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.63; studies = 5; participants = 497; I-2 = 0%; low-certainty evidence). There is probably little or no difference in patient satisfaction (MD -0.42; 95% CI -1.09 to 0.25; studies = 1; participants = 72; moderate-certainty evidence). No study reported on chronic pain. There is probably little or no difference in time to first bowel movement (MD 0.00; 95% CI -15.99 to 15.99; studies = 1; participants = 76; moderate-certainty evidence). Authors' conclusions There was some evidence that pre-emptive and preventive NSAIDs reduce both pain and morphine consumption, although this was not universal for all pain and morphine consumption outcomes. Any differences found were not clinically significant, although we cannot exclude this in more painful operations. Moreover, without any evidence of reductions in opioid adverse effects, the clinical significance of these results is questionable although few studies reported these outcomes. Only one study reported clinically significant adverse events from NSAIDs administered before surgery and, therefore, we have very few data to assess the safety of either pre-emptive or preventive NSAIDs. Therefore, future research should aim to adhere to the highest methodology and be adequately powered to assess serious adverse events of NSAIDs and reductions in opioid adverse events.
引用
收藏
页数:187
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Vitreoretinal surgery:: pre-emptive analgesia
    Kristin, N
    Schöfeld, CL
    Bechmann, M
    Bengisu, M
    Ludwig, K
    Scheider, A
    Kampik, A
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 85 (11) : 1328 - 1331
  • [22] Postoperative pain management in dogs: Efficacy of pre-emptive analgesia with lignocaine and ketamine
    Raj, H
    Amarpal
    Singh, GR
    Aithal, HP
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2000, 70 (04): : 362 - 365
  • [23] The value of pre-emptive analgesia in the treatment of postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Uzunköy, A
    Coskun, A
    Akinci, OF
    EUROPEAN SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2001, 33 (01) : 39 - 41
  • [24] Effect of pre-emptive gabapentin on postoperative pain following lower extremity orthopaedic surgery under spinal anaesthesia
    Panah, Khahi M.
    Yaghooti, A. A.
    Marashi, S. H.
    Nadjafi, A.
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 52 (12) : 879 - 882
  • [26] Effect of pre-emptive hydromorphone administration on postoperative pain relief - a randomized controlled trial
    Kopp, A
    Wachauer, D
    Hoerauf, KH
    Zulus, E
    Reiter, WJ
    Steltzer, H
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2000, 112 (23) : 1002 - 1006
  • [27] The Effect of Pre-Emptive Analgesia on the Postoperative Pain in Pediatric Otolaryngology: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Zielinski, Jakub
    Morawska-Kochman, Monika
    Dudek, Krzysztof
    Czapla, Michal
    Zatonski, Tomasz
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (10)
  • [28] Timing of pre-emptive tenoxican is important for postoperative analgesia
    Deirdre M. O’Hanlon
    Thavachentham Thambipillai
    Sallyann T. Colbert
    Padraic W. Keane
    H. Fred Given
    Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 2001, 48 : 162 - 166
  • [29] Timing of pre-emptive tenoxicam is important for postoperative analgesia
    O'Hanlon, DM
    Thambipillai, T
    Colbert, ST
    Keane, PW
    Given, HF
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2001, 48 (02): : 162 - 166
  • [30] Impact of pre-emptive analgesia and epidural fentanyl on postoperative pain relief following spine surgery: a re-audit
    Varadan, R.
    Lanka, P.
    Sanem, V.
    Ahmed, H.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 71 : 44 - 44