Automated model selection for simulation based on relevance reasoning

被引:15
|
作者
Levy, AY
Iwasaki, Y
Fikes, RD
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Knowledge Syst Lab, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] AT&T Bell Labs, Murray Hill, NJ 07974 USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
model formulation; relevance reasoning; qualitative reasoning; simulation;
D O I
10.1016/S0004-3702(97)00056-8
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Constructing an appropriate model is a crucial step in performing the reasoning required to successfully answer a query about the behavior of a physical situation. In the compositional modeling approach of Falkenhainer and Forbus (1991), a system is provided with a library of composable pieces of knowledge about the physical world called model fragments. The model construction problem involves selecting appropriate model fragments to describe the situation, Model construction can be considered either for static analysis of a single state or for simulation of dynamic behavior over a sequence of states. The latter is significantly more difficult than the former since one must select model fragments without knowing exactly what will happen in the future states. The model construction problem in general can advantageously be formulated as a problem of reasoning about relevance of knowledge that is available to the system using a general framework for reasoning about relevance described by Levy (1993) and Levy and Sagiv (1993). In this paper, we present a model formulation procedure based on that framework for selecting model fragments efficiently for the case of simulation, For such an algorithm to be useful, the generated model must be adequate for answering the given query and, at the same time, as simple as possible, We define formally the concepts of adequacy and simplicity and show that the algorithm in fact generates an adequate and simplest model. (C) 1997 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 394
页数:44
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Automated Reduced Model Order Selection
    Rewienski, Michal
    Fotyga, Grzegorz
    Lamecki, Adam
    Mrozowski, Michal
    IEEE ANTENNAS AND WIRELESS PROPAGATION LETTERS, 2015, 14 : 382 - 385
  • [42] Bayesian optimization for automated model selection
    Malkomes, Gustavo
    Schaff, Chip
    Garnett, Roman
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 29 (NIPS 2016), 2016, 29
  • [43] Automated Model Selection with Bayesian Quadrature
    Chai, Henry
    Ton, Jean-Francois
    Osborne, Michael A.
    Garnett, Roman
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 97, 2019, 97
  • [44] A new model for automated pushback selection
    Jelvez, Enrique
    Morales, Nelson
    Askari-Nasab, Hooman
    COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2020, 115
  • [45] NARX model selection based on simulation error minimisation and LASSO
    Bonin, M.
    Seghezza, V.
    Piroddi, L.
    IET CONTROL THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2010, 4 (07): : 1157 - 1168
  • [46] Agent-Based Simulation Model of Sexual Selection Mechanism
    Drezewski, Rafal
    AGENT AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS: TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS, 2015, 38 : 155 - 166
  • [47] Automated model-based testing of X simulation models with TorX
    van Osch, M
    QUALITY OF SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURES AND SOFTWARE QUALITY, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3712 : 227 - 241
  • [48] A Bucket-Tree Based Algorithm for Automated Reasoning
    Hu, Chunling
    Lv, Gang
    Wang, Xiaofeng
    2018 24TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATION AND COMPUTING (ICAC' 18), 2018, : 624 - 631
  • [49] SUPPOSITION-BASED LOGIC FOR AUTOMATED NONMONOTONIC REASONING
    BESNARD, P
    SIEGEL, P
    LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 1988, 310 : 592 - 601
  • [50] Rewrite-based automated reasoning: Challenges ahead
    Kapur, D
    REWRITING TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS, 1996, 1103 : 1 - 2