Automated model selection for simulation based on relevance reasoning

被引:15
|
作者
Levy, AY
Iwasaki, Y
Fikes, RD
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Knowledge Syst Lab, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] AT&T Bell Labs, Murray Hill, NJ 07974 USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
model formulation; relevance reasoning; qualitative reasoning; simulation;
D O I
10.1016/S0004-3702(97)00056-8
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Constructing an appropriate model is a crucial step in performing the reasoning required to successfully answer a query about the behavior of a physical situation. In the compositional modeling approach of Falkenhainer and Forbus (1991), a system is provided with a library of composable pieces of knowledge about the physical world called model fragments. The model construction problem involves selecting appropriate model fragments to describe the situation, Model construction can be considered either for static analysis of a single state or for simulation of dynamic behavior over a sequence of states. The latter is significantly more difficult than the former since one must select model fragments without knowing exactly what will happen in the future states. The model construction problem in general can advantageously be formulated as a problem of reasoning about relevance of knowledge that is available to the system using a general framework for reasoning about relevance described by Levy (1993) and Levy and Sagiv (1993). In this paper, we present a model formulation procedure based on that framework for selecting model fragments efficiently for the case of simulation, For such an algorithm to be useful, the generated model must be adequate for answering the given query and, at the same time, as simple as possible, We define formally the concepts of adequacy and simplicity and show that the algorithm in fact generates an adequate and simplest model. (C) 1997 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 394
页数:44
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Defaults and relevance in model-based reasoning
    Khardon, R
    Roth, D
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1997, 97 (1-2) : 169 - 193
  • [2] RELEVANCE AND REASONING - THE CASE OF THE SELECTION TASK
    EVANS, JSBT
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 27 (3-4) : 148 - 148
  • [3] The scope and limits of simulation in automated reasoning
    Davis, Ernest
    Marcus, Gary
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2016, 233 : 60 - 72
  • [4] Research of Model Intelligent Selection Based on Rule Reasoning
    Chen Weidong
    Hu Qinghe
    Xu Jiazhuo
    Yang Dalei
    2008 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY AND TRAINING AND 2008 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS,, 2009, : 752 - +
  • [5] Selection of optimum successive state based on cloud model in simulation reasoning of complex system using QSIM
    Wang, H. (graduated852@163.com), 1600, Science and Engineering Research Support Society, 20 Virginia Court, Sandy Bay, Tasmania, Australia (06):
  • [6] Model-based abductive reasoning in automated software testing
    Angius, Nicola
    LOGIC JOURNAL OF THE IGPL, 2013, 21 (06) : 931 - 942
  • [7] MDL based model selection for relevance vector regression
    Anguita, D
    Gagliolo, M
    ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS - ICANN 2002, 2002, 2415 : 468 - 473
  • [8] Intelligent Selection of Simulation Experiment Design Methods Based on Hybrid Reasoning
    Lu L.-Y.
    Li W.
    Yang M.
    Ma P.
    Zidonghua Xuebao/Acta Automatica Sinica, 2019, 45 (06): : 1055 - 1064
  • [9] Automated feature selection through relevance feedback
    Tusk, C
    Koperski, K
    Aksoy, S
    Marchisio, G
    IGARSS 2003: IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, VOLS I - VII, PROCEEDINGS: LEARNING FROM EARTH'S SHAPES AND SIZES, 2003, : 3691 - 3693
  • [10] Relevance rule based reasoning - A rule based view of case based reasoning
    Huang, Y
    Miles, R
    PROCEEDINGS ISAI/IFIS 1996 - MEXICO - USA COLLABORATION IN INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGIES, 1996, : 255 - 261