Myocardial and Cardiocirculatory Reserve in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Ejection Fraction

被引:0
|
作者
Schulz, Olaf [1 ,2 ]
Brala, Debora [2 ,3 ]
Allison, Thomas G. [4 ]
Schimke, Ingolf [2 ]
机构
[1] Kardio West, Praxis Intervent & Konvent Kardiol Spandau, Markt 5, D-13597 Berlin, Germany
[2] Humboldt Univ, Charite, Univ Med Berlin, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
[3] Sana Klinikum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany
[4] Mayo Clin & Mayo Grad Sch Med, Rochester, MN USA
来源
JOURNAL OF HEART VALVE DISEASE | 2015年 / 24卷 / 04期
关键词
LEFT-VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY; VALVULAR HEART-DISEASE; DOPPLER-ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; VALVE-REPLACEMENT; RISK; SIMVASTATIN; PROGRESSION; EZETIMIBE; SURGERY; PATIENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and aim of the study: Managing patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) remains a major challenge. Myocardial as well as cardiocirculatory reserve have been hypothesized to predict outcome in patients with asymptomatic AS. Methods: A total of 48 patients (indexed aortic valve area 0.39 +/- 0.12 cm(2)/m(2); ejection fraction (EF) 67 7%) underwent spiroergometry and dobutamine stress echocardiography. Death or valve surgery served as a combined endpoint for follow up. Results: Thirty-seven patients reached the endpoint after a mean of 756 days (range: 100-2146 days). Age and gender-corrected univariate Cox proportional analysis revealed the presence of mild obstructive lung disease, stroke work loss (SWL), end-systolic diameter index, and E/Flow propagation velocity as the best predictive clinical, valvular, cardiostructural, and left ventricular filling pressure parameters, respectively. After inclusion of these parameters into a baseline multivariable Cox proportional hazard model, SWL (HR 1.21 per rise of 1 unit, CI 1.08-1.35, p = 0.0005) and female gender (HR 3.37, CI 1.50-7.59, p = 0.0044) were independently predictive. Similarly, the best-performing myocardial parameter, EF after dobutamine, was independently predictive (HR 0.75 per 5 units, CI 0.57-0.99, p = 0.035) after inclusion. The best-performing exercise capacity parameter, Watt(max), was of borderline significance (HR 0.93 per 5 units, CI 0.86-1.00, p = 0.0505). For each parameter, cut-off values were determined by time-dependent receiver-operator characteristics. The Kaplan-Meier curves of the patients above versus below the cutoffs differed significantly for SWL (p = 0.001), Watt. (p = 0.001), and gender (p = 0.013). Conclusion: Besides SWL and female gender, the EF after dobutamine as well as highest exercise stress intensity reached are helpful in determining the prognosis of asymptomatic patients with moderate severe AS.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 464
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Aortic Stenosis Progression in Patients With preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
    Ersboll, Mads
    Enezi, Fawaz A.
    Velazquez, Eric J.
    Tinnemore, Amanda
    Kisslo, Joseph
    Harrison, J. Kevin
    Bashore, Thomas M.
    Samad, Zainab
    CIRCULATION, 2013, 128 (22)
  • [22] Haemodynamic and metabolic phenotyping of patients with aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction: a specific phenotype of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction?
    De Biase, Nicolo
    Mazzola, Matteo
    Del Punta, Lavinia
    Di Fiore, Valerio
    De Carlo, Marco
    Giannini, Cristina
    Costa, Giulia
    Paneni, Francesco
    Mengozzi, Alessandro
    Nesti, Lorenzo
    Gargani, Luna
    Masi, Stefano
    Pugliese, Nicola Riccardo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2023, 25 (11) : 1947 - 1958
  • [23] HEMODYNAMIC ASSESSMENT OF LOW GRADIENT AORTIC STENOSIS WITH PRESERVED EJECTION FRACTION
    Patel, Mitika
    Cavalcante, Joao
    Crock, Frederick
    Katz, William
    Schindler, John
    Khanna, Mukul
    Khandhar, Sameer
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 63 (12) : A1979 - A1979
  • [24] Natural History of Moderate Aortic Stenosis with Preserved and Low Ejection Fraction
    Mann, Tomer D.
    Loewenstein, Itamar
    Ben Assa, Eyal
    Topilsky, Yan
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2021, 34 (07) : 735 - 743
  • [25] Global and regional myocardial function and outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction
    Luksic, Vlatka Reskovic
    Postolache, Adriana
    Martinez, Christophe
    Dulgheru, Raluca
    Ilardi, Federica
    Tridetti, Julien
    Mai-Linh Nguyen
    Piette, Caroline
    Pasalic, Marijan
    Bulum, Josko
    Hanzevacki, Jadranka Separovic
    Lancellotti, Patrizio
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (03) : 238 - 245
  • [26] Prognostic Value of Longitudinal Strain in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction - The COFRASA/GENERAC Study
    Melissopoulou, Maria
    Nguyen, Virginia
    Mathieu, Tiffany
    Attias, David
    Dreyfus, Julien
    Codogno, Isabelle
    Vahanian, Alec
    Messika-zeitoun, David
    CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 134 (02) : 156 - 156
  • [27] PROGNOSTIC ROLE OF MYOCARDIAL FLOW RESERVE IN HEART FAILURE WITH PRESERVED EJECTION FRACTION
    Kopeva, K., V
    KARDIOLOGIYA, 2023, 63 (12) : 82 - 86
  • [28] Myocardial Injury and Cardiac Reserve in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Obokata, Masaru
    Reddy, Yogesh N. V.
    Melenovsky, Vojtech
    Kane, Garvan C.
    Olson, Thomas P.
    Jarolim, Petr
    Borlaug, Barry A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 72 (01) : 29 - 40
  • [29] Myocardial Injury and Cardiac Reserve Limitation in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Obokata, Masaru
    Reddy, Yogesh N. V.
    Melenovsky, Vojtech
    Kane, Garvan C.
    Olson, Thomas P.
    Jarolim, Petr
    Borlaug, Barry A.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2018, 24 (08) : S21 - S22
  • [30] AORTIC STENOSIS AND HEART FAILURE: DIFFERENCES AND SIMILARITIES BEYOND PRESERVED EJECTION FRACTION
    De Biase, Nicolo
    Del Punta, Lavinia
    Mazzola, Matteo
    De Carlo, Marco
    Mengozzi, Alessandro
    Nesti, Lorenzo
    Masi, Stefano
    Pugliese, Nicola Riccardo
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2024, 42