Managing crop damage caused by house mice (Mus domesticus) in Australia

被引:5
|
作者
Kaboodvandpour, Shahram [1 ]
Leung, Luke K. -P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Kurdistan Univ, Dept Environm Sci, Sanandaj 15175, Kurdistan, Iran
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Anim Studies, Gatton, Australia
来源
INTEGRATIVE ZOOLOGY | 2010年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
Australia; crop damage; Mus domesticus; threshold density; MOUSE-POPULATIONS; MALLEE-WHEATLANDS; FERTILITY-CONTROL; RODENT OUTBREAKS; FOOD PREFERENCES; ZINC PHOSPHIDE; BAIT TRAILS; PLAGUE; PREDATION; RICE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1749-4877.2010.00188.x
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
A large-scale outbreak of the house mouse populations occurs in grain growing in Australia on average once every four years. High densities of mice cause major yield losses to cereal crops, and low to moderate densities of mice also cause some losses. Several predictive models based on rainfall patterns have been developed to forecast mouse density. These models carry some uncertainty and the economic value of basing management actions on these models is not clear. Baiting is the most commonly used method and zinc phosphide and other rodenticide bait are effective in reducing up to 90% of mouse populations. Ecologically-based best farming practice for controlling mice has recently been developed on the basis of long-term field studies of mouse populations. No effective biological control method has been developed for mice. However, grain growers still cannot make economically rational decisions to implement control because they do not know the pest threshold density (D-T) above which the economic benefits of control exceed the economic costs of control. Applied predator-prey theory suggests that understanding the relationship between mouse density and damage is the basis for determining D-T. Understanding this relationship is the first research priority for managing mouse damage. The other research priority is to develop a reliable method to estimate unbiased mouse density.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 14
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The risk of exploitation during communal nursing in house mice, Mus musculus domesticus
    Ferrari, Manuela
    Lindholm, Anna K.
    Koenig, Barbara
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2015, 110 : 133 - 143
  • [23] SUPINE DEFENSE IN THE INTRASPECIFIC FIGHTING OF MALE HOUSE MICE MUS-DOMESTICUS
    PELLIS, SM
    PELLIS, VC
    MANNING, CJ
    DEWSBURY, DA
    AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR, 1992, 18 (05) : 373 - 379
  • [24] Prospects for virally vectored immunocontraception in the control of wild house mice (Mus domesticus)
    Redwood, Alec J.
    Smith, Lee M.
    Lloyd, Megan L.
    Hinds, Lyn A.
    Hardy, Christopher M.
    Shellam, Geoffrey R.
    WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2007, 34 (07) : 530 - 539
  • [25] A microsatellite-based MHC genotyping system for house mice (Mus domesticus)
    Meagher, S
    Potts, WK
    HEREDITAS, 1997, 127 (1-2) : 75 - 82
  • [26] MATING IN FREE-LIVING WILD HOUSE MICE (MUS-DOMESTICUS)
    HURST, JL
    JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 1986, 210 : 623 - 628
  • [27] Effects of resource distribution on activity and territory defence in house mice, Mus domesticus
    Gray, SJ
    Jensen, SP
    Hurst, JL
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2002, 63 : 531 - 539
  • [28] Burrows and burrow-cleaning behavior of house mice (Mus musculus domesticus)
    Schmid-Holmes, S
    Drickamer, LC
    Robinson, AS
    Gillie, LL
    AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST, 2001, 146 (01): : 53 - 62
  • [29] MITOCHONDRIAL-DNA VARIATION IN HOUSE MICE, MUS-DOMESTICUS (RUTTY)
    SAGE, RD
    PRAGER, EM
    TICHY, H
    WILSON, AC
    BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 1990, 41 (1-3) : 105 - 123
  • [30] Genetic basis for male aggression and survivorship in wild house mice (Mus domesticus)
    Lenington, S
    Drickamer, LC
    Robinson, AS
    Erhart, M
    AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR, 1996, 22 (02) : 135 - 145