A Comparison of a Two-Dimensional and a Three-Dimensional Method for Inclusion Determinations in Tool Steel

被引:28
|
作者
Doostmohammadi, H. [1 ]
Karasev, A. [1 ]
Jonsson, P. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Inst Technol KTH, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
steel cleanness; cross sectional method; electrolytic extraction; INCAFeature; LADLE TREATMENT; DEOXIDATION PRODUCTS; ALLOY; AL; ZR; TI;
D O I
10.1002/srin.200900149
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
To produce clean commercial tool steel the non-metallic inclusions characteristics have to be known, since they influence the mechanical properties of steel. In this work, inclusion characteristics in steel samples from plant trials were studied. The samples were collected in the steel plant according the two following methods: (a) 2D investigations of inclusions by a cross sectional method and (b) 3D investigations of inclusions collected on a film filter after electrolytic extraction. More specifically, the chemical composition, morphology, number and size distribution of inclusions in tool steel samples taken from ladle during melt treatment were determined by both methods. In both methods SEM equipped with EDS was used for compositional analysis of inclusions. In addition, in the cross sectional method an automated detection program called 'INCAFeature' was used to collect more statistics of non-metallic inclusions. The composition of inclusions larger than 5 mu m was found to contain 49% CaO based on the results from both methods. However, for smaller inclusions it was found that the accuracy of the 2D method was less than that of the 3D method due to the influence of the metal matrix on the results. In addition, it was found that a critical inclusion size of 4 mu m could be defined for the 3D method, above which the standard deviation in composition determination was very low.
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 406
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison between the two-dimensional and three-dimensional lattices
    Dolocan, A
    Dolocan, VO
    Dolocan, V
    MODERN PHYSICS LETTERS B, 2004, 18 (25): : 1301 - 1309
  • [2] Three-dimensional analysis of a spheroidal inclusion in a two-dimensional quasicrystal body
    Gao, Yang
    Ricoeur, Andreas
    PHILOSOPHICAL MAGAZINE, 2012, 92 (34) : 4334 - 4353
  • [3] A comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional analyses of facial motion
    Gross, MM
    Trotman, CA
    Moffatt, KS
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 1996, 66 (03) : 189 - 194
  • [4] Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional laparoscopic video systems
    McDougall, EM
    Soble, JJ
    Wolf, JS
    Nakada, SY
    Elashry, OM
    Clayman, RV
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1996, 10 (04) : 371 - 374
  • [5] Comparison Between Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Dynamic Stall
    Kaufmann, K.
    Gardner, A. D.
    Costes, M.
    NEW RESULTS IN NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL FLUID MECHANICS X, 2016, 132 : 315 - 325
  • [6] A Comparison Between the Accuracy of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Strain Measurements
    Desai, Niranjan
    Poling, Joel
    Fischer, Gregor
    Georgakis, Christos
    JOURNAL OF NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, DIAGNOSTICS AND PROGNOSTICS OF ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, 2018, 1 (02):
  • [7] Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional thoracoscopic segmentectomy in lung cancer
    Shen, Ming-Sheng
    Hsieh, Ming-Yu
    Lin, Ching-Hsiung
    Wang, Bing-Yen
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 46 (07) : 2657 - 2661
  • [8] Evaluation of gallbladder motility: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasonography
    Stads, Susanne
    Venneman, Niels G.
    Scheffer, Robert C. H.
    Samsorn, Melvin
    van Erpecum, Karel J.
    ANNALS OF HEPATOLOGY, 2007, 6 (03) : 164 - 169
  • [9] Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging in the case of oncological patients
    Voth, M
    Opfermann, T
    Käpplinger, S
    Gottschild, D
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2001, 28 (08): : 1078 - 1078
  • [10] Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery
    Lewis, Linda A.
    Zaritsky, Eve
    Heinrichs, William L.
    Nezhat, Camran
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 107 (04): : 78S - 78S