Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of Biosimilar Insulin Aspart Premix SAR341402 Mix 70/30 Compared with Originator Insulin Aspart Mix 70/30 in Adults with Diabetes (GEMELLI M): A Subgroup Analysis by Prior Type of Premix Insulin

被引:1
|
作者
Aravind, S. R. [1 ,2 ]
Singh, Kiran P. [3 ]
Mogylnytska, Liliia [4 ]
Zalevskaya, Alsu G. [5 ]
Matyjaszek-Matuszek, Beata [6 ]
Wernicke-Panten, Karin [7 ]
Nguyen-Pascal, My-Lien [8 ]
Pierre, Suzanne [8 ]
Rotthaeuser, Baerbel [7 ]
Kramer, Daniel [7 ]
Mukherjee, Bhaswati [9 ]
机构
[1] Diacon Hosp, Diabet Care & Res Ctr, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
[2] Columbia Asia Hosp, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
[3] Fortis Hosp Mohali, Dept Endocrinol, Chandigarh, India
[4] Khmelnytskyi Reg Hosp, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine
[5] First Pavlov State Med Univ, Dept Endocrinol, St Petersburg, Russia
[6] Med Univ Lublin, Dept Endocrinol, Lublin, Poland
[7] Sanofi, Frankfurt, Germany
[8] Sanofi Res & Dev, Chilly Mazarin, France
[9] Sanofi, 54 Rue La Boetie, F-75008 Paris, France
关键词
Biosimilar insulin; GEMELLI M; Insulin aspart mix; Premix; SAR341402; Subgroup by prior premix insulin; ASSOCIATION; HYPOGLYCEMIA; WORKGROUP;
D O I
10.1007/s13300-022-01279-z
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction We compared the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of biosimilar insulin aspart premix SAR341402 Mix 70/30 (70% intermediate SAR341402 protamine and 30% rapid SAR341402 solution) (SAR(Asp)-Mix) with its originator NovoMix 30 insulin aspart mix (NN-Mix) in adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes switching from different premix insulin analogs. Methods This phase 3, randomized, open-label, multinational, 26-week trial (GEMELLI M) enrolled 402 participants with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. At randomization, participants switched from their prestudy premix insulin NovoMix 30 (n = 341) or Humalog Mix 25/Liprolog Mix 25 (n = 61) to equivalent (1:1) doses of either SAR(Asp)-Mix or NN-Mix at least twice daily (1:1 randomization). In this subgroup analysis, efficacy measures [change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), daily insulin dose], and safety outcomes [hypoglycemia incidence, adverse events (including hypersensitivity and injection site reactions), anti-insulin aspart antibodies] of SAR(Asp)-Mix were compared with those of NN-Mix separately according to the participants' prestudy premix insulin. Results At week 26, change from baseline in HbA1c (primary efficacy endpoint) was similar between SAR(Asp)-Mix and NN-Mix in those participants pretreated with NovoMix 30 [least squares (LS) mean difference 0.05%, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.195% to 0.289%] or Humalog Mix 25/Liprolog Mix 25 (LS mean difference 0.28%, 95% CI -0.279% to 0.830%) (P value for treatment-by-subgroup interaction = 0.46). In both subgroups, safety outcomes, including immunogenicity, and changes in daily insulin doses were similar between treatments over 26 weeks. Conclusions Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity profiles of SAR(Asp)-Mix are similar to NN-Mix over 26 weeks in adults with diabetes irrespective of prior type of premix insulin.
引用
收藏
页码:1299 / 1310
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy and safety of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 versus exenatide in subjects with type 2 diabetes failing to achieve glycemic control with metformin and a sulfonylurea
    Bergenstal, Richard
    Lewin, Andrew
    Bailey, Timothy
    Chang, Denise
    Gylvin, Titus
    Roberts, Victor
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2009, 25 (01) : 65 - 75
  • [42] Efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/insulin aspart versus biphasic insulin aspart 30 in Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes: A phase III, open-label, 2:1 randomized, treat-to-target trial
    Yang, Wenying
    Ma, Jianhua
    Hong, Tianpei
    Liu, Ming
    Miao, Heng
    Peng, Yongde
    Wang, Changjiang
    Xu, Xiangjin
    Yang, Tao
    Nielsen, Anne M.
    Pan, Lili
    Liu, Weihong
    Zhao, Weigang
    [J]. DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2019, 21 (07): : 1652 - 1660
  • [43] Efficacy and Safety of Prandial Premixed Therapy Using Insulin Lispro Mix 50/50 3 Times Daily Compared With Progressive Titration of Insulin Lispro Mix 75/25 or Biphasic Insulin Aspart 70/30 Twice Daily in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized, 16-Week, Open-Label Study
    Farcasiu, Eugenia
    Ivanyi, Tibor
    Mozejko-Pastewka, Barbara
    Birkus, Zita
    Csog, Jozsef
    Kowalska, Irina
    Coetzer, Thomas Frederic
    Bulgurlu, Sami
    Schinzel, Birgit
    Kiljanski, Jacek
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2011, 33 (11) : 1682 - 1693
  • [44] Therapy with biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 (NovoMix 30) improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: results from a Russian cohort of IMPROVE observational program designed to study safety and efficiency of biphasic insulin aspart 30 in routine clinical practice
    Shestakova, M. V.
    Akil, Ballan
    [J]. DIABETES MELLITUS, 2010, 13 (01): : 92 - 100
  • [45] The Effectiveness and Safety of Starting Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 (Premix) in Older versus Younger Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM): Results from the A1chieve Study
    Shah, Siddharth N.
    Li, Yuxiu
    Hussein, Zanariah
    Hasan, Mohammad I.
    Chakkarwar, Praful N.
    Soewondo, Pradana
    [J]. DIABETES, 2012, 61 : A598 - A598
  • [46] Original paper: Efficacy and safety analysis of insulin degludec/insulin aspart compared with biphasic insulin aspart 30: A phase 3, multicentre, international, open-label, randomised, treat-to-target trial in patients with type 2 diabetes fasting during Ramadan
    Hassanein, Mohamed
    Echtay, Akram Salim
    Malek, Rachid
    Omar, Mahomed
    Shaikh, Shehla Sajid
    Ekelund, Magnus
    Kaplan, Kadriye
    Kamaruddin, Nor Azmi
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 135 : 218 - 226
  • [47] Long-term clinical and cost outcomes of treatment with biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 versus insulin glargine in insulin naive type 2 diabetes patients: cost-effectiveness analysis in the UK setting
    Valentine, WJ
    Palmer, AJ
    Lammert, M
    Nicklasson, L
    Foos, V
    Roze, S
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2005, 21 (12) : 2063 - 2071
  • [48] Insulin 70/30 mix plus metformin versus triple oral therapy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes after failure of two oral drugs - Efficacy, safety, and cost analysis
    Schwartz, S
    Sievers, R
    Strange, P
    Lyness, WH
    Hollander, P
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (08) : 2238 - 2243
  • [49] Efficacy and Safety of Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30/70 in Type 2 Diabetes Suboptimally Controlled on Oral Antidiabetic Therapy in Korea: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study
    Song, Kee-Ho
    Kim, Jung Min
    Noh, Jung-Hyun
    Park, Yongsoo
    Son, Hyun-Shik
    Min, Kyong Wan
    Ko, Kyung Soo
    [J]. DIABETES & METABOLISM JOURNAL, 2013, 37 (02) : 117 - 124
  • [50] Comments on Long-term clinical and cost outcomes of treatment with biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 versus insulin glargine in insulin-naive type 2 diabetes patients:: cost-effectiveness analysis in the UK setting
    Currie, CJ
    McEwan, P
    Poole, C
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2006, 22 (05) : 967 - 968