Instruments to assess integrated care: a systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Lyngso, Anne Marie [1 ]
Godtfredsen, Nina Skavlan [2 ]
Host, Dorte [1 ]
Frolich, Anne [1 ]
机构
[1] Bispebjerg Hosp, Dept Integrated Healthcare, DK-2400 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Hvidovre Univ Hosp, Dept Resp Med, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
关键词
integrated care; systematic literature review; measurement instruments; organisational elements; IMPROVING PRIMARY-CARE; DELIVERY SYSTEMS; MEDICAL-CARE; SERVICES; QUALITY; COORDINATION; ILLNESS; MODEL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Although several measurement instruments have been developed to measure the level of integrated health care delivery, no standardised, validated instrument exists covering all aspects of integrated care. The purpose of this review is to identify the instruments concerning how to measure the level of integration across health-care sectors and to assess and evaluate the organisational elements within the instruments identified. Methods: An extensive, systematic literature review in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Web of Science for the years 1980-2011. Selected abstracts were independently reviewed by two investigators. Results: We identified 23 measurement instruments and, within these, eight organisational elements were found. No measurement instrument covered all organisational elements, but almost all studies include well-defined structural and process aspects and six include cultural aspects; 14 explicitly stated using a theoretical framework. Conclusion and discussion: This review did not identify any measurement instrument covering all aspects of integrated care. Further, a lack of uniform use of the eight organisational elements across the studies was prevalent. It is uncertain whether development of a single 'all-inclusive' model for assessing integrated care is desirable. We emphasise the continuing need for validated instruments embedded in theoretical contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The quality of instruments to assess the process of shared decision making: A systematic review
    Gartner, Fania R.
    Bomhof-Roordink, Hanna
    Smith, Ian P.
    Scholl, Isabelle
    Stiggelbout, Anne M.
    Pieterse, Arwen H.
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (02):
  • [22] A systematic review of instruments that assess the implementation of hospital quality management systems
    Groene, Oliver
    Botje, Daan
    Sunol, Rosa
    Andree Lopez, Maria
    Wagner, Cordula
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2013, 25 (05) : 525 - 541
  • [23] Instruments to assess self-regulation in children and adolescents: A systematic review
    Sole-Ferrer, Neus
    Mumbardo-Adam, Cristina
    Company-Romero, Ramon
    Balmana-Gelpi, Noemi
    Corbella-Santoma, Sergi
    REVISTA DE PSICOLOGIA CLINICA CON NINOS Y ADOLESCENTES, 2019, 6 (02): : 36 - 43
  • [24] Instruments to assess patient satisfaction after teleconsultation and triage: a systematic review
    Iseli, Martina Allemann
    Kunz, Regina
    Blozik, Eva
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2014, 8 : 893 - 907
  • [25] Instruments to assess frailty in community dwelling older adults: A systematic review
    Rasiah, Jananee
    Gruneir, Andrea
    Oelke, Nelly D.
    Estabrooks, Carole
    Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna
    Cummings, Greta G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2022, 134
  • [26] A systematic review to assess the performance of instruments to measure pressure ulcer dimensions
    O'Meara, Susan
    Cullum, Nicky
    Bland, Martin
    WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2007, 15 (06) : A127 - A127
  • [27] Systematic Review of Instruments to Assess Computational Thinking in Early Years of Schooling
    Ocampo, Lina Marcela
    Corrales-alvarez, Milena
    Cardona-Torres, Sergio Augusto
    Zapata-Caceres, Maria
    EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2024, 14 (10):
  • [28] Comments on 'Instruments to assess appropriateness of hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review'
    Riddle, D. L.
    Ghomrawi, H. M. K.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2023, 31 (07) : 995 - 996
  • [29] Reliability, validity and responsiveness of instruments to assess disabilities in personal care in patients with rheumatic disorders. A systematic review
    Swinkels, RAHM
    Dijkstra, PU
    Bouter, LM
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2005, 23 (01) : 71 - 79
  • [30] A Systematic Review of Palliative Care Competency Assessment Instruments
    Pereira, Jose
    Bush, Shirley
    Hall, Pippa
    Weaver, Lynda
    Rice, Jill
    Grassau, Pamela
    Allen, Dawn
    Ufholz, Lee-Anne
    Lapointe, Bernard
    Tsang, Tammy
    Zinkie, Samantha
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 2014, 30 (03) : 208 - 208