Impact of Drain Placement and Duration on Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis

被引:12
|
作者
Addison, Poppy [1 ,2 ]
Nauka, Peter C. [1 ,2 ]
Fatakhova, Karina [2 ]
Amodu, Leo [1 ,2 ]
Kohn, Nina [3 ]
Rilo, Horacio L. Rodriguez [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Zucker Sch Med Hofstra Northwell, Dept Surg, Hempstead, NY USA
[2] Northwell Hlth, Ctr Dis Pancreas, 400 Community Dr,Off 311, Manhasset, NY 11030 USA
[3] Feinstein Inst Med Res, Biostat Unit, Manhasset, NY USA
关键词
Outcomes; Drains; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Whipple; PANCREATIC HEAD RESECTION; DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY; MULTICENTER TRIAL; ROUTINE DRAINAGE; RISK SCORE; FISTULA; MANAGEMENT; REMOVAL; NSQIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2019.04.071
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The decisions to routinely place a drain after pancreaticoduodenectomy and how long to leave the drain remain controversial due to conflicting evidence and significant variations in clinical practice. This study aims to address those questions by using a large national database and a rigorous analytical model. Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2015-2016 Pancreatectomy Participant Use Data Files were used to identify patients who had undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 7583). Univariable and multivariable binomial regression analyses were performed to control for potential confounders and various preoperative risk factors. Cox regression with drain as a time-dependent covariate, conditional on having a drain placed, was used to examine the association between the drain remaining in place and morbidities. Results: Of 7583 patients, drains were placed in 6666 (87.9%). Drain placement decreased the risk of developing serious morbidity (relative risk [RR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.82), overall morbidity (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.72-0.87), and organ space surgical site infection (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.61-0.85). Drain placement did not change the risk of developing a clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.78-1.19). However, for those with drains placed, length of drainage was independently associated with serious morbidity (hazard ratio [HR] 3.06, 95% CI 2.65-3.53), overall morbidity (HR 2.48, 95% CI 2.202.80), and organ space surgical site infection (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.23-1.74). Conclusions: Routine drain placement following pancreaticoduodenectomy may decrease postoperative complications, including serious morbidity, overall morbidity, and organ space surgical site infections; however, length of drainage was associated with increased risk of the previously-named complications. These results support the routine placement and early removal of intraoperative surgical drains in pancreaticoduodenectomy. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 107
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Body habitus, serum albumin, and the outcomes after craniotomy for tumor: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis
    Dasenbrock, Hormuzdiyar H.
    Liu, Kevin X.
    Chavakula, Vamsidhar
    Devine, Christopher A.
    Gormley, William B.
    Claus, Elizabeth B.
    Smith, Timothy R.
    Dunn, Ian F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 126 (03) : 677 - 689
  • [22] EFFECT OF METABOLIC SYNDROME ON PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES AFTER RADICAL CYSTECTOMY: A NATIONAL SURGICAL QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ANALYSIS
    Dahmen, Aaron S.
    Nusbaum, David J.
    Lazarovich, Alon
    Fialkoff, Jared
    Modi, Parth K.
    Agarwal, Piyush K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E1258 - E1259
  • [23] Diabetes Adversely Influences Postoperative Outcomes After Oesophagectomy: An Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database
    Lorenzo, Aldenb
    Goltsman, David
    Apostolou, Christos
    Das, Amitabha
    Merrett, Neil
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [24] Economic impact of the use of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
    Fansi, Alvine
    Ly, Angela
    Mayrand, Julie
    Wassef, Maggy
    Rho, Aldanie
    Beauchamp, Sylvie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2021, 37 (01)
  • [25] Impact of operative indication and surgical complexity on outcomes after thoracic endovascular aortic repair at National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Centers
    Ehlert, Bryan A.
    Durham, Christopher A.
    Parker, Frank M.
    Bogey, William M.
    Powell, Charles S.
    Stoner, Michael C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 54 (06) : 1629 - 1636
  • [26] Is the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Calculator Predictive of Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy?
    Peng, J. S.
    Brady, M.
    Ji, W.
    Attwood, K.
    Kukar, M.
    Hochwald, S. N.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (SUPPL 1) : S166 - S166
  • [27] Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative to Improve Surgical Outcomes
    Guillamondegui, Oscar D.
    Gunter, Oliver L.
    Hines, Leonard
    Martin, Barbara J.
    Gibson, William
    Clarke, P. Chris
    Cecil, William T.
    Cofer, Joseph B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2012, 214 (04) : 709 - 714
  • [28] Impact of frailty on outcomes in geriatric femoral neck fracture management: An analysis of national surgical quality improvement program dataset
    Dayama, Anand
    Olorunfemi, Odunayo
    Greenbaum, Simon
    Stone, Melvin E., Jr.
    McNelis, John
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 28 : 185 - 190
  • [29] Impact of BMI on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis
    Smith, Radhika K.
    Broach, Robyn B.
    Hedrick, Traci L.
    Mahmoud, Najjia N.
    Paulson, E. Carter
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2014, 57 (06) : 687 - 693
  • [30] Readmission After Craniotomy for Tumor: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis COMMENTS
    Jensen, Randy L.
    Das, Paramita
    Hunt, Matthew A.
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 80 (04) : 562 - 562