Land reform and the new elite: Exclusion of the poor from communal land in Namaqualand, South Africa

被引:30
|
作者
Lebert, T.
Rohde, R.
机构
[1] Univ Western Cape, Programme Land & Agr Studies, ZA-7535 Cape Town, South Africa
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr African Studies, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
pastoralism; municipal commonage; rangeland management; elite capture;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaridenv.2006.03.023
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The reserves and homelands across South Africa share a common history of policy interventions resulting in sedentarization, villagization and formalization of communal land use. In Namaqualand, such interventions culminated in the 1980s with attempts by the state and local vested interests to privatize the commons in the three largest Namaqualand reserves, including Leliefontein. This proposed privatization, although ostensibly aimed at averting land degradation and modernizing agricultural production, was as much about the apartheid state's broader strategy of co-option, and served to further long standing processes of class formation in the coloured communal areas of Namaqualand. In the post-apartheid period land reform has expanded the communal land-base in Namaqualand by over 25%. In spite of this, the management of the new commons in Leliefontein has many of the characteristics of land management policies imposed during apartheid. As a result, the new commons have effectively been arrogated by the same category of people who would have benefited under past privatization initiatives. This paper examines how the interests of a local elite have gained exclusive access to the new commonage farms. This has come about despite the government's commonage policy which privileges access by poorer, disadvantaged communal farmers. This case study uncovers the dynamic complexity of community driven land reform especially in relation to the roles of rural elites and their relationship to government institutions. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:818 / 833
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Land, power and custom. Controversies generated by South Africa's Communal Land Rights Act
    Peters, Pauline E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES, 2009, 36 (02): : 466 - 468
  • [32] The people's choice: options for land ownership in South Africa's land reform
    Ramutsindela, Maano
    Mogashoa, Monene
    [J]. SOCIAL DYNAMICS-A JOURNAL OF THE CENTRE FOR AFRICAN STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN, 2013, 39 (02): : 308 - 316
  • [33] Land reform in South Africa: Beneficiary participation and impact on land use in the Waterberg District
    Netshipale, Avhafunani J.
    Oosting, Simon J.
    Raidimi, Edzisani N.
    Mashiloane, Majela L.
    de Boer, Imke J. M.
    [J]. NJAS-WAGENINGEN JOURNAL OF LIFE SCIENCES, 2017, 83 : 57 - 66
  • [34] Land, Power and Custom: Controversies Generated by South Africa's Communal Land Rights Act.
    Cliffe, Lionel
    [J]. AFRICAN STUDIES REVIEW, 2010, 53 (02) : 191 - 193
  • [35] The relevance of ecosystem services to land reform policies: Insights from South Africa
    Clements, Hayley S.
    De Vos, Alta
    Bezerra, Joana Carlos
    Coetzer, Kaera
    Maciejewski, Kristine
    Mograbi, Penelope J.
    Shackleton, Charlie
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 100
  • [36] Land reform in South Africa is failing. Can it be saved?
    Cousins, Ben
    [J]. TRANSFORMATION-CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON SOUTHERN AFRICA, 2016, 92 : 135 - 157
  • [37] Land Reform in South Africa: The Conversation That Never Took Place
    Makombe, Godswill
    [J]. QUALITATIVE REPORT, 2018, 23 (06) : 1401 - 1421
  • [38] Social cohesion for the unfinished business of land reform in South Africa
    Mbedu, Nkosinathi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AFRICAN RENAISSANCE STUDIES, 2014, 9 (01): : 100 - 114
  • [39] Rethinking Land Reform and Its Contribution to Livelihoods in South Africa
    Rusenga, Clemence
    [J]. AFRICA REVIEW, 2022, 14 (02) : 125 - 150
  • [40] Political Compromise on Land Reform: A Study of South Africa and Namibia
    Kariuki, Samuel
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS-SAJIA, 2007, 14 (01): : 99 - 114