BROILER AND SWINE PRODUCTION: ANIMAL WELFARE LEGISLATION SCENARIO

被引:9
|
作者
Rodrigues da Silva, Raquel Baracat Tosi [2 ]
Naeaes, Irenilza de Alencar [1 ]
de Moura, Daniella Jorge [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, FEAGRI, Lab Conforto Term Construcoes Rurais & Ambiencia, BR-13083970 Campinas, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Campinas, FEAGRI, Programa Posgrad Engn Agr, BR-13083970 Campinas, SP, Brazil
来源
SCIENTIA AGRICOLA | 2009年 / 66卷 / 06期
关键词
animal production; rearing; transportation; environment; norms; STRESS;
D O I
10.1590/S0103-90162009000600001
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Brazil is the world largest meat exporter and one of the most recent demands of the import market is directed towards animal welfare. Codes, norms and legislations used in Brazil are out of date, and in most cases those adopted for both poultry and swine production are based on international standards to meet trade requirements. This research aimed to study and describe an overall scenario of the standards, norms and legislations for animal welfare items applied to broiler and swine production: rearing, handling and transportation. The critical points of these items were identified in accordance to standards and current literature on animal welfare issues, effective on January 2008. The comparison was based on given scores varying from 1-5 (very bad to very good) as function of the existence of standard norms and legislations for each country and/or economic block, and for each type of demand, as well as the level of adoption by producers. When compared to counterparts Brazil detained the lowest score for all types of demands, and its mean score of norms is lower (p<0.05). For both poultry and swine production the European Union provides detailed information to producers, followed by Australia and United States. Exception is made to standards in moving or transporting swine within the farm. Brazilian legislation for poultry production presents a general insufficiency of 58%, while in swine production the highest deficit is in transportation. There is a need to invest in updating animal welfare standards, norms and legislation in the country for maintaining its international competitiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 720
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Review of animal welfare data for cattle and swine
    Calvo-Lorenzo, Michelle S.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2019, 97 : 13 - 14
  • [42] Animal Welfare and the Intensification of Animal Production
    Fraser, David
    ETHICS OF INTENSIFICATION: AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT AND CULTURAL CHANGE, 2008, 16 : 167 - 189
  • [43] Global and Brazilian Scenario of Guidelines and Legislation on Welfare in Pig Farming
    de Castro Lippi, Isabella Cristina
    Caldara, Fabiana Ribeiro
    de Lima Almeida Paz, Ibiara Correia
    Odakura, Agnes Markiy
    ANIMALS, 2022, 12 (19):
  • [44] Welfare aspects of broiler breeder production
    不详
    VETERINARY RECORD, 1998, 143 (08) : 208 - 208
  • [45] ANIMAL HEALTH AND EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY - ANIMAL WELFARE LEGISLATION IN EEC
    RAY, PM
    SCOTT, WN
    BRITISH VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1973, 129 (03): : 194 - 201
  • [46] The animal's dignity in Swiss Animal Welfare Legislation - Challenges and opportunities
    Schindler, Stefanie
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 2013, 84 (02) : 251 - 254
  • [47] Cost-efficiency of animal welfare in broiler production systems: A pilot study using the Welfare Quality® assessment protocol
    Gocsik, Eva
    Brooshooft, Suzanne D.
    de Jong, Ingrid C.
    Saatkamp, Helmut W.
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2016, 146 : 55 - 69
  • [48] A brief summary of European legislation regarding animal welfare
    Dwinger, Ron
    Lambooij, Bert
    BERLINER UND MUNCHENER TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2012, 125 (7-8): : 297 - 304
  • [50] IS IT NECESSARY TO AMEND GERMAN ANIMAL-WELFARE LEGISLATION
    BAUMGARTNER, G
    DEUTSCHE TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1993, 100 (02): : 48 - 50