Relatedness and competitive asymmetry - the growth and development of common frog tadpoles

Individuals can compete either through direct interference or uptake of limiting resources. If competing individuals are able to recognize their relatives, relatedness of competitors may evoke kin selection, which favours relatively even resource share among relatives. Resource competition is often size-symmetric, i.e. proportional to an individual's biomass, while interference competition is asymmetric giving large individuals a disproportionate advantage over small individuals. Kin-selection is predicted to reduce the intensity of direct interference and competitive asymmetry, leading to increased mean and decreased variation in individual size. We tested these predictions by investigating the effects of relatedness on age and size at metamorphosis in the common frog Rana temporaria tadpoles in a laboratory experiment. We reared related (full- and half-sibs) and unrelated tadpoles of different sizes (small, large, small and large together) at two densities until metamorphosis. Relatedness had little effect on mean growth, but it reduced size variation, as measured with coefficient of variation. Furthermore, there was a significant interaction between relatedness and density in size at metamorphosis, so that relatives always grew better in lower density, but growth was less affected by density among unrelated individuals. This indicates that the effects of relatedness on tadpole performance may be context dependent. Initial size differences in the mixed size treatment evened out during the course of the experiment, and initially small tadpoles were able to compensate the early growth losses, although it took longer for them to reach metamorphosis. We conclude that although relatedness may have rather small effects on the growth and development of R. temporaria tadpoles, it increases the symmetry of resource share decreasing between-individual variation in size at metamorphosis.