Exploring the Factors Driving Changes in Farmland within the Tumen/Tuman River Basin

被引:6
|
作者
Kang, Cholhyok [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yili [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Paudel, Basanta [1 ,3 ]
Liu, Linshan [1 ]
Wang, Zhaofeng [1 ]
Li, Ryongsu [4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Land Surface Pattern & Simulat, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] CAS Ctr Excellence Tibetan Plateau Earth Sci, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[4] Inst Earth Environm Informat, Pyongyang, North Korea
关键词
farmland changes; driving forces; logistic regression; LAND-USE CHANGE; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; LANDSCAPE CHANGE; SPATIAL-PATTERN; TUMEN RIVER; CHINA; FORCES; URBAN; DYNAMICS; PROVINCE;
D O I
10.3390/ijgi7090352
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Understanding farmland changes and their mechanisms is important for food security and sustainable development. This study assesses the farmland changes and their drivers within the Tumen River of China and the Tuman River within the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPR Korea) from 1991 to 2016 (1991-2000, 2000-2010, and 2010-2016). Farmland surfaces in Tumen/Tuman River Basin (TRB) for each of the years were mapped from satellite imagery using an object-based image segmentation and a support vector machine (SVM) approach. A logistic regression was applied to discern the mechanisms underlying farmland changes. Results indicate that cultivated surfaces changes within the two regions were characterized by large differences during the three time periods. The decreases of cultivated surface of -15.55 km(2) (i.e., 0.55% of total cultivated surface area in 2000) and -23.61 km(2) (i.e., 0.83% of total cultivated surface area in 2016) occurred in China between 1991 and 2000 and between 2010 and 2016, respectively; while an increase of 30.98 km(2) (i.e., 1.09% of total cultivated surface area in 2010) was seen between 2000 and 2010. Cultivated surfaces increased within DPR Korea side over the three time periods; a marked increase, in particular, was seen between 1991 and 2000 by 443.93 km(2) (i.e., 23.43% of total cultivated surface area in 2000), while farmland increased by 140.87 km(2) (i.e., 6.92% of total cultivated surface area in 2010) and 180.86 km(2) (i.e., 1.78% of total cultivated surface area in 2016), respectively, between 2000 and 2010 and between 2010 and 2016. We also found that expansions and contractions in farmland within both regions of the TRB were mainly influenced by topographic, soil, climatic, and distance factors, which had different importance degrees. Among these significant forces, the temperatures in the two regions were paramount positive factors on farmland changes during 1991-2016 and slope in China and precipitation in DPR Korea were the paramount negative factors affecting farmland changes, respectively. Additionally, except for between 2000 and 2010 in DPR Korea TRB region, most of the factors significantly influencing the farmland changes revealed the same positive or negative effects in different periods, because of mountainous topography. This study allows enhancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying farmland changes in the TRB.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Investigating Terrestrial Water Storage Changes and Their Driving Factors in the Southwest River Basin of China Using Geodetic Data
    Li, Xianpao
    Zhong, Bo
    Li, Jiancheng
    Wang, Haihong
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 61 : 1 - 15
  • [42] Vegetation Dynamics and Potential Factors Driving Mechanisms in the Tarim River Basin
    Yue, Shengru
    Wang, Lunche
    Cao, Qian
    Sun, Jia
    Diqiu Kexue - Zhongguo Dizhi Daxue Xuebao/Earth Science - Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2024, 49 (09): : 3399 - 3410
  • [43] Spatiotemporal Variation of Evapotranspiration and Its Driving Factors in the Urumqi River Basin
    Ablikim, Kamila
    Yang, Han
    Mamattursun, Azimatjan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (18)
  • [44] Spatiotemporal variations and driving factors of reference evapotranspiration in the Yiluo river basin
    Li, Yizhe
    Wang, Huiliang
    Zhang, Xin
    Li, Chenhao
    Tian, Zihao
    Zhang, Qiufen
    Lv, Xizhi
    Qin, Tianling
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2023, 10
  • [45] Spatiotemporal Variations of Carbon Emissions and Their Driving Factors in the Yellow River Basin
    Wang, Shiqing
    Sun, Piling
    Sun, Huiying
    Liu, Qingguo
    Liu, Shuo
    Lu, Da
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (19)
  • [46] Wetland Landscape change in Daliaohe River basin and the driving factors analysis
    Yu, Lei
    Li, Min
    Wang, Sihui
    Zhao, Yanwei
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS AND ECOSYSTEM CONSERVATION (ISEIS 2010), 2010, 2 : 1255 - 1264
  • [47] Variations in Water Stress and Its Driving Factors in the Yellow River Basin
    Lyu, Haodong
    Qiao, Jianmin
    Fang, Gonghuan
    Liang, Wenting
    Tang, Zidong
    Lv, Furong
    Zhang, Qin
    Qiu, Zewei
    Huang, Gengning
    LAND, 2025, 14 (01)
  • [48] Research on Sediment Discharge Variations and Driving Factors in the Tarim River Basin
    Ye, Zhaoxia
    Chen, Yaning
    Zhang, Qifei
    Liu, Yongchang
    Zhang, Xueqi
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (22)
  • [49] Analysis of streamflow variations in the Heihe River Basin, northwest China: Trends, abrupt changes, driving factors and ecological influences
    Zhang, Aijing
    Zheng, Chunmiao
    Wang, Sai
    Yao, Yingying
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY-REGIONAL STUDIES, 2015, 3 : 106 - 124
  • [50] Spatiotemporal Changes of Glaciers in the Yigong Zangbo River Basin over the Period of the 1970s to 2023 and Their Driving Factors
    Yuan, Suo
    Wang, Ninglian
    Chang, Jiawen
    Zhou, Sugang
    Shi, Chenlie
    Zhao, Mingjie
    REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (17)