Feasibility of a Synthetic MR Imaging Sequence for Spine Imaging

被引:21
|
作者
Vargas, M. I. [1 ]
Drake-Perez, M. [2 ]
Delattre, B. M. A. [3 ]
Boto, J. [1 ]
Lovblad, K-O. [1 ]
Boudabous, S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Geneva Univ Hosp, Div Diagnost & Intervent Neuroradiol, Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ Hosp Marques de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Dept Radiol, Santander, Spain
[3] Geneva Univ Hosp, Div Radiol, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
PROTON-DENSITY; BRAIN; RELAXATION; QUANTIFICATION; SEGMENTATION; VALIDATION; VALUES;
D O I
10.3174/ajnr.A5728
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Synthetic MR imaging is a method that can produce multiple contrasts from a single sequence, as well as quantitative maps. Our aim was to determine the feasibility of a synthetic MR image for spine imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with clinical indications of infectious, degenerative, and neoplastic disease underwent an MR imaging of the spine (11 cervical, 8 dorsal, and 19 lumbosacral MR imaging studies). The SyntAc sequence, with an acquisition time of 5 minutes 40 seconds, was added to the usual imaging protocol consisting of conventional sagittal T1 TSE, T2 TSE, and STIR TSE. RESULTS: Synthetic T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and STIR images were of adequate quality, and the acquisition time was 53% less than with conventional MR imaging. The image quality was rated as good for both synthetic and conventional images. Interreader agreement concerning lesion conspicuity was good with a Cohen of 0.737. Artifacts consisting of white pixels/spike noise across contrast views, as well as flow artifacts, were more common in the synthetic sequences, particularly in synthetic STIR. There were no statistically significant differences between readers concerning the scores assigned for image quality or lesion conspicuity. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that synthetic MR imaging is feasible in spine imaging and produces, in general, good image quality and diagnostic confidence. Furthermore, the non-negligible time savings and the ability to obtain quantitative measurements as well as to generate several contrasts with a single acquisition should promise a bright future for synthetic MR imaging in clinical routine.
引用
收藏
页码:1756 / 1763
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Extraspinal findings on lumbar spine MR imaging
    Gebara, Nathalie V.
    Meltzer, Daniel E.
    JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY CASE REPORTS, 2009, 3 (08): : 5 - 13
  • [32] MR imaging of epidural hematoma in the lumbar spine
    Theodore A. Dorsay
    Clyde A. Helms
    Skeletal Radiology, 2002, 31 : 677 - 685
  • [33] MR imaging of cervical spine motion with haste
    Duerinckx, AJ
    Yu, WD
    El-Saden, S
    Kim, D
    Wang, JC
    Sandhu, HS
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1999, 17 (03) : 371 - 381
  • [34] MR imaging of epidural hematoma in the lumbar spine
    Dorsay, TA
    Helms, CA
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2002, 31 (12) : 677 - 685
  • [35] Oblique MR Imaging in Cervical Spine Surgery
    Hakan, Simsek
    Omer, Saglam
    Ercan, Malkoc
    Serdar, Kaya
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND ANALYTICAL MEDICINE, 2015, 6 (05) : 660 - 663
  • [36] MR Imaging of the Spine: Urgent and Emergent Indications
    Lavi, Efrat Saraf
    Pal, Amit
    Bleicher, Drew
    Kang, Kyungmin
    Sidani, Charif
    SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 2018, 39 (06) : 551 - 569
  • [37] APPLICATION OF CONTRAST AGENTS IN MR IMAGING OF THE SPINE
    FULBRIGHT, R
    ROSS, JS
    SZE, G
    JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1993, 3 (01): : 219 - 232
  • [38] Lumbar Spine: Reliability of MR Imaging Findings
    Carrino, John A.
    Lurie, Jon D.
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Tosteson, Tor D.
    Carragee, Eugene J.
    Kaiser, Jay
    Grove, Margaret R.
    Blood, Emily
    Pearson, Loretta H.
    Weinstein, James N.
    Herzog, Richard
    RADIOLOGY, 2009, 250 (01) : 161 - 170
  • [39] Tophaceous gout of the spine: MR imaging features
    Hsu, CY
    Shih, TTF
    Huang, KM
    Chen, PQ
    Sheu, JJ
    Li, YW
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2002, 57 (10) : 919 - 925
  • [40] MR imaging of the spine: trauma and degenerative disease
    Wilmink, JT
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1999, 9 (07) : 1259 - 1266