Metaphyseal Distal Tibia Fractures: A Cohort, Single-Surgeon Study Comparing Outcomes of Patients Treated With Minimally Invasive Plating Versus Intramedullary Nailing

被引:28
|
作者
Barcak, Eric [1 ]
Collinge, Cory A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Texas John Peter Smith, Dept Orthoped Surg, Ft Worth, TX USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, 221 Kirkland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
关键词
MIPO; nail; nailing; minimally-invasive; minimally invasive; distal tibia; Metaphysis; metaphyseal; tibia; fracture; distal; MIPPO; EXTRAARTICULAR FRACTURES; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; OPEN REDUCTION; FIXATION; OSTEOSYNTHESIS; SCREWS; BOLTS;
D O I
10.1097/BOT.0000000000000530
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and functional outcomes of patients with distal tibia fractures treated with minimally invasive plating (MIPO) or intramedullary nailing (IMN). Design: Cohort study. Setting: Level II regional trauma center. Patients: Overall, 86 patients with metaphyseal distal fractures (within 5 cm of joint) with simple or no articular involvement treated by a single, fellowship trained, orthopedic trauma surgeon from 2002 to 2013. Intervention: Intramedullary nailing or minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis. Main Outcome Measures: Clinical and radiographic results were evaluated at a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Limb-specific outcomes (American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgeons' ankle-hindfoot instrument) and whole-person measures [Short Form 36 (SF-36) instrument] were assessed at the final follow-up. Results: We studied 86 patients with distal tibia fractures treated with MIPO (43 patients) and IMN (43 patients). Thirty-seven patients in the MIPO group and 27 in the IMN group met inclusion criteria. All patients ultimately healed, with the average time to union of 23 weeks in both the groups. Complications were similar between the 2 groups (MIPO vs. IMN, respectively), including nonunion (8% vs. 7%), malalignment (3.6% vs. 3%), wound complications (3.6% vs. 3%), and infection (0% vs. 3.6%). The need for secondary procedures for the removal of implants was 25.9% in the IMN group (distal locking screws only in 6/7) versus 8.3% in the MIPO group (P = 0.05). Additionally, the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgeons and all SF-36 version 2 domain scores were quantitatively higher for the IMN group, although only Role Emotional reached a level of statistical superiority between the groups. Conclusions: Similar clinical results and marginally enhanced functional outcomes were seen when treating nonarticular or minimally articular metaphyseal distal tibia fractures with IMN compared with MIPO. However, patients treated with IMN required more frequent secondary surgeries for the removal of painful distal locking screws.
引用
收藏
页码:E169 / E174
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative study between intramedullary interlocking nailing and minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis for distal tibia extra-articular fractures
    Mani, Kapil K. C.
    Pangeni, Bandhu Ram
    Marahatta, Suman Babu
    Sigdel, Arun
    Amuda, K. C.
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF TRAUMATOLOGY, 2022, 25 (02) : 90 - 94
  • [32] Comparative study between intramedullary interlocking nailing and minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis for distal tibia extra-articular fractures
    KC Kapil Mani
    Pangeni Bandhu Ram
    Marahatta Suman Babu
    Sigdel Arun
    KC Amuda
    中华创伤杂志(英文版), 2022, (02) : 90 - 94
  • [33] Comparing Intramedullary Nailing Versus Locked Plating in the Treatment of Native Distal Femur Fractures: Is One Superior to the Other?
    Yasir Salam Siddiqui
    Mazhar Abbas
    M. Julfiqar
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2022, 56 : 353 - 354
  • [34] Comparing Intramedullary Nailing Versus Locked Plating in the Treatment of Native Distal Femur Fractures: Is One Superior to the Other?
    Jaclyn M. Jankowski
    Patrick F. Szukics
    Jay K. Shah
    David M. Keller
    Robinson E. Pires
    Frank A. Liporace
    Richard S. Yoon
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2021, 55 : 646 - 654
  • [35] Comparing Intramedullary Nailing Versus Locked Plating in the Treatment of Native Distal Femur Fractures: Is One Superior to the Other?
    Jankowski, Jaclyn M.
    Szukics, Patrick F.
    Shah, Jay K.
    Keller, David M.
    Pires, Robinson E.
    Liporace, Frank A.
    Yoon, Richard S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 55 (03) : 646 - 654
  • [36] Comparing Intramedullary Nailing Versus Locked Plating in the Treatment of Native Distal Femur Fractures: Is One Superior to the Other?
    Siddiqui, Yasir Salam
    Abbas, Mazhar
    Julfiqar, M.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2022, 56 (02) : 353 - 354
  • [37] Radiographic and clinical comparisons of distal tibia shaft fractures (4 to 11 cm proximal to the plafond): Plating versus intramedullary nailing
    Vallier, Heather A.
    Le, T. Toan
    Bedi, Asheesh
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2008, 22 (05) : 307 - 311
  • [38] Comparison between Intramedullary Nailing (IMN) and Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO) Technique in Distal Tibia Fractures in Term of Union
    Imran, Muhammad
    Ishaq, Mohammad
    Kakar, Lal Mohammad Khan
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2016, 10 (04): : 1441 - 1444
  • [39] How should open tibia fractures be treated? A retrospective comparative study between intramedullary nailing and biologic plating
    Kayali, Cemil
    Agus, Haluk
    Eren, Ahmet
    Ozluk, Serkan
    ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2009, 15 (03): : 243 - 248
  • [40] Overlapping intramedullary nailing after failed minimally invasive locked plating for osteoporotic distal femur fractures - Report of 2 cases
    Yoo, Je-Hyun
    Kim, Seok-Woo
    Kwak, Yoon-Hae
    Kim, Hyung-Jun
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2015, 46 (06): : 1174 - 1177