Prediction of coal wettability using machine learning for the application of CO2 sequestration

被引:16
|
作者
Ibrahim, Ahmed Farid [1 ]
机构
[1] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Ctr Integrat Petr Res, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Machine learning; Coal wettability; Empirical correlation; WATER; SALINITY; NETWORKS; PRESSURE; BEHAVIOR; METHANE; GAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103670
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) is an essential greenhouse gas-reducing technology that can be employed throughout the energy system. Carbon dioxide (CO2) sequestration in underground stratas is one of the effecient ways of reducing carbon emissions. CO2 sequestration in coal formations can be used to improve the methane recovery from coal formations (ECBM). The efficiency of this process highly depend on the wettability of the coal in contact with CO2. Different experimental methods including contact angle (CA) measurments can be used to estimate the wettability. However, the experimental techniques are expensive, incosistant, and timeconsuming. Therefore, this study introduces the application of artificial neural network (ANN) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) to estimate the CA in coal-water-CO2 system. ANN and ANFIS techniques were built using 250 point dataset to calculate the contact angle of coal formation. The input parameters were the coal properties, operating pressure, and temperature. 70% of the data set was used to train the model, while 30% of the data was used for the testing process. The models were then validated with a set of unseen data. The results showed that ANN and ANFIS models accurately predicted the contact angle in the coal-water-CO2 system as a function of coal properties and the operating conditions. The correlation coefficient (R) and the average absolute percent error (AAPE) between the actual and estimated contact angle were used as indicators for the model performance. ANN and ANFIS models predicted the contact angle with R values higher than 0.96 for the different datasets. AAPE was less than 7% in both models for the training and testing datasets. An empirical equation was built using the weight and biases from the developed ANN model. The new equation was validated with the unseen data set and the R-value was found to be higher than 0.96 with an AAPE less than 6%.these results confirm the reliability of the proposed models to get the contact angle in the coal formation without laboratory work or complex calculations. These models can be used to screen the coal formation targets for carbon storage.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Decoding wettability in coal-water-CO2 system for enhanced sequestration security
    Cui, Chao
    Yao, Yanbin
    Liu, Dameng
    Sun, Xiaoxiao
    Gas Science and Engineering, 2024, 124
  • [32] The Extraction Effect of Supercritical CO2 on Coal Organic Matter Based on CO2 Sequestration in Unmineable Coal Seam
    Jiang, Renxia
    Yu, Hongguan
    MINERALS, 2022, 12 (10)
  • [33] CO2 sequestration potential of Charqueadas coal field in Brazil
    Santarosa, Cristian S.
    Crandall, Dustin
    Haljasmaa, Igor V.
    Hur, Tae-Bong
    Fazio, James J.
    Warzinski, Robert P.
    Heemann, Roberto
    Ketzer, J. Marcelo M.
    Romanov, Vyacheslav N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2013, 106 : 25 - 34
  • [34] The mechanical behaviour of coal with respect to CO2 sequestration in deep coal seams
    Viete, D. R.
    Ranjith, P. G.
    FUEL, 2007, 86 (17-18) : 2667 - 2671
  • [35] Performance analysis of various machine learning algorithms for CO2 leak prediction and characterization in geo-sequestration injection wells
    Harati, Saeed
    Gomari, Sina Rezaei
    Rahman, Mohammad Azizur
    Hassan, Rashid
    Hassan, Ibrahim
    Sleiti, Ahmad K.
    Hamilton, Matthew
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2024, 183 : 99 - 110
  • [36] TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS ON UNDERGROUND COAL GASIFICATION AND CO2 SEQUESTRATION
    Da Gama, Carlos Dinis
    Torres, Vidal Navarro
    Falcao Neves, Ana Paula
    DYNA-COLOMBIA, 2010, 77 (161): : 101 - 108
  • [37] North Dakota lignite and Pittsburgh bituminous coal: a comparative analysis in application to CO2 sequestration
    Haljasmaa, Igor V.
    McLendon, T. Robert
    Jikich, Sinisha A.
    Goodman, Angela
    Siriwardane, Hema
    Soong, Yee
    McIntyre, Dustin L.
    Bromhal, Grant S.
    Irdi, Gino A.
    Dobroskok, Anastasia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OIL GAS AND COAL TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 4 (03) : 264 - 281
  • [38] CO2 SEQUESTRATION INTO SHALE BEDS - SIRNAK COAL MINES
    Tosun, Yildirim Ismail
    GEOCONFERENCE ON ENERGY AND CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES, VOL 1 (SGEM 2014), 2014, : 101 - 108
  • [39] Progress and expectation of CO2 sequestration safety in coal seams
    He, Xueqiu
    Tian, Xianghui
    Song, Dazhao
    Meitan Kexue Jishu/Coal Science and Technology (Peking), 2022, 50 (01): : 212 - 219
  • [40] CO2 sequestration from coal fired power plants
    Giavarini, Carlo
    Maccioni, Filippo
    Santarelli, Maria Laura
    FUEL, 2010, 89 (03) : 623 - 628