The art and applications of fluorescence in situ hybridization in endocrine pathology

被引:7
|
作者
Kontogeorgos, G [1 ]
机构
[1] G Gennimatas Athens Gen Hosp, Dept Pathol, Athens 11527, Greece
关键词
chromosomes; cytogenetics; fluorescence; comparative genomic hybridization; hybridization; endocrine tumors; multiple endocrine neoplasia-1;
D O I
10.1385/EP:11:2:123
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or molecular cytogenetics is currently recognized as a reliable, sensitive, and reproducible technique for identifying the copy number and structure of chromosomes. FISH combines molecular genetics with classic cytogenetics and allows simultaneous morphologic evaluation on a single slide. Centromeric DNA probes are used to detect specific chromosomes and telomeric probes to demonstrate all chromosomes, Sequence-specific probes can localize in situ a single gene copy on a specific chromosome locus, FISH allows cytogenetic investigation of metaphase spreads and interphase nuclei. Several protocols have been proposed to analyze preparations from fresh samples or archival material. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a novel cytogenetic technique, which combines FISH with automatic digital image analysis. Comparative analysis of the hybridization products of tumor DNA and reference DNA with normal metaphase chromosomes, each labeled with color different fluorochrome, can retrieve chromosomal imbalances of the entire genome in a single experiment. FISH and CGH are powerful morphologic tools in understanding physiologic mechanisms and in resolving problems of the pathogenesis of several diseases, These techniques shed light on the cytogenetic background in many endocrinological disorders, providing a better understanding of the activities and alterations of endocrine cell function.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 136
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques for Brassica: Methodological development and practical applications
    Snowdon, RJ
    Kohler, W
    Friedt, W
    Kohler, A
    BRASSICA 97: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BRASSICAS, 1998, (459): : 127 - 134
  • [32] Fluorescence in situ hybridization: 1998
    Stanley, PE
    Kricka, LJ
    LUMINESCENCE, 1999, 14 (04) : 221 - 230
  • [33] Fluorescence in situ hybridization with comets
    Santos, SJ
    Singh, NP
    Natarajan, AT
    EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH, 1997, 232 (02) : 407 - 411
  • [34] Advances in fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Raap, AK
    MUTATION RESEARCH-FUNDAMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF MUTAGENESIS, 1998, 400 (1-2) : 287 - 298
  • [35] FLUORESCENCE IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION
    PRICE, CM
    BLOOD REVIEWS, 1993, 7 (02) : 127 - 134
  • [36] Cytogenetic alterations in renal tumors.: Applications for comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Mertz, KD
    Tchinda, J
    Küfer, R
    Möller, P
    Rubin, MA
    Moch, H
    Perner, S
    UROLOGE, 2006, 45 (03): : 316 - 322
  • [37] Fluorescence in situ hybridization in hematology
    Milosevic, Ivana
    Popovic, Stevan
    Urosevic, Ivana
    VOJNOSANITETSKI PREGLED, 2012, 69 (11) : 986 - 993
  • [38] Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis with a tissue microarray: 'FISH and chips' analysis of pathology archives
    Sugimura, Haruhiko
    Mori, Hiroki
    Nagura, Kiyoko
    Kiyose, Shin-ichiro
    Hong, Tao
    Isozaki, Masaru
    Igarashi, Hisaki
    Shinmura, Kazuya
    Hasegawa, Akio
    Kitayama, Yasuhiko
    Tanioka, Fumihiko
    PATHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 60 (08) : 543 - 550
  • [39] Chromogenic in situ hybridization in tumor pathology
    Isola, J
    UPDATE IN PATHOLOGY, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 10 - 12
  • [40] IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION IN DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY
    LLOYD, RV
    JIN, L
    BONNERUP, MK
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1994, 69 (06) : 597 - 598