The Use of Google Trends in Health Care Research: A Systematic Review

被引:610
|
作者
Nuti, Sudhakar V. [1 ]
Wayda, Brian [2 ]
Ranasinghe, Isuru [1 ]
Wang, Sisi [3 ]
Dreyer, Rachel P. [1 ]
Chen, Serene I. [2 ]
Murugiah, Karthik [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale New Haven Hosp, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat, New Haven, CT 06504 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, New Haven, CT USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 10期
关键词
INTERNET SEARCH TRENDS; ENGINE QUERY DATA; SEASONAL-VARIATION; SUICIDE DEATH; SURVEILLANCE; DISEASE; INFORMATION; INFECTION; BEHAVIOR; FLU;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0109583
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Google Trends is a novel, freely accessible tool that allows users to interact with Internet search data, which may provide deep insights into population behavior and health-related phenomena. However, there is limited knowledge about its potential uses and limitations. We therefore systematically reviewed health care literature using Google Trends to classify articles by topic and study aim; evaluate the methodology and validation of the tool; and address limitations for its use in research. Methods and Findings: PRISMA guidelines were followed. Two independent reviewers systematically identified studies utilizing Google Trends for health care research from MEDLINE and PubMed. Seventy studies met our inclusion criteria. Google Trends publications increased seven-fold from 2009 to 2013. Studies were classified into four topic domains: infectious disease (27% of articles), mental health and substance use (24%), other non-communicable diseases (16%), and general population behavior (33%). By use, 27% of articles utilized Google Trends for casual inference, 39% for description, and 34% for surveillance. Among surveillance studies, 92% were validated against a reference standard data source, and 80% of studies using correlation had a correlation statistic >= 0.70. Overall, 67% of articles provided a rationale for their search input. However, only 7% of articles were reproducible based on complete documentation of search strategy. We present a checklist to facilitate appropriate methodological documentation for future studies. A limitation of the study is the challenge of classifying heterogeneous studies utilizing a novel data source. Conclusion: Google Trends is being used to study health phenomena in a variety of topic domains in myriad ways. However, poor documentation of methods precludes the reproducibility of the findings. Such documentation would enable other researchers to determine the consistency of results provided by Google Trends for a well-specified query over time. Furthermore, greater transparency can improve its reliability as a research tool.
引用
收藏
页数:49
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Use of Blockchain Technology in the Health Care Sector: Systematic Review
    Elangovan, Deepa
    Long, Chiau Soon
    Bakrin, Faizah Safina
    Tan, Ching Siang
    Goh, Khang Wen
    Yeoh, Siang Fei
    Loy, Mei Jun
    Hussain, Zahid
    Lee, Kah Seng
    Idris, Azam Che
    Ming, Long Chiau
    [J]. JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 10 (01)
  • [22] Drug use indicators in primary health care: a systematic review
    da Silva, Andre Santos
    Maciel, Gabriella de Alcantara
    de Lima Wanderley, Luciane Soares
    Wanderley, Almir Goncalves
    [J]. REVISTA PANAMERICANA DE SALUD PUBLICA-PAN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 41
  • [23] Trends in Glucocerebrosides Research: A Systematic Review
    Desplanque, Mazarine
    Bonte, Marie-Amandine
    Gressier, Bernard
    Devos, David
    Chartier-Harlin, Marie-Christine
    Belarbi, Karim
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [24] A Decade of Research on the Use of Three-Dimensional Virtual Worlds in Health Care: A Systematic Literature Review
    Ghanbarzadeh, Reza
    Ghapanchi, Amir Hossein
    Blumenstein, Michael
    Talaei-Khoei, Amir
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (02)
  • [25] The Use of Social Media for Dissemination of Research Evidence to Health and Social Care Practitioners: Protocol for a Systematic Review
    Roberts-Lewis, Sarah F.
    Baxter, Helen A.
    Mein, Gill
    Quirke-McFarlane, Sophia
    Leggat, Fiona J.
    Garner, Hannah M.
    Powell, Martha
    White, Sarah
    Bearne, Lindsay
    [J]. JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2023, 12
  • [26] Google Trends Extraction Tool for Google Trends Extended for Health data
    Raubenheimer, Jacques Eugene
    [J]. SOFTWARE IMPACTS, 2021, 8
  • [27] Gamification in Health Care Management: Systematic Review of the Literature and Research Agenda
    Gajardo Sanchez, Alfonso D.
    Murillo-Zamorano, Luis R.
    Lopez-Sanchez, Joseangel
    Bueno-Munoz, Carmen
    [J]. SAGE OPEN, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [28] Priorities of patients, caregivers and health-care professionals for health research - A systematic review
    Levelink, Michael
    Voigt-Barbarowicz, Mona
    Bruett, Anna Levke
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2020, 23 (05) : 992 - 1006
  • [29] Use of communities of practice in business and health care sectors: A systematic review
    Linda C Li
    Jeremy M Grimshaw
    Camilla Nielsen
    Maria Judd
    Peter C Coyte
    Ian D Graham
    [J]. Implementation Science, 4
  • [30] Predictors of Health Care Use of Women with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Lo-Fo-Wong, Deborah N. N.
    Sitnikova, Kate
    Sprangers, Mirjam A. G.
    de Haes, Hanneke C. J. M.
    [J]. BREAST JOURNAL, 2015, 21 (05): : 508 - 513