The Use of Google Trends in Health Care Research: A Systematic Review

被引:610
|
作者
Nuti, Sudhakar V. [1 ]
Wayda, Brian [2 ]
Ranasinghe, Isuru [1 ]
Wang, Sisi [3 ]
Dreyer, Rachel P. [1 ]
Chen, Serene I. [2 ]
Murugiah, Karthik [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale New Haven Hosp, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat, New Haven, CT 06504 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, New Haven, CT USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 10期
关键词
INTERNET SEARCH TRENDS; ENGINE QUERY DATA; SEASONAL-VARIATION; SUICIDE DEATH; SURVEILLANCE; DISEASE; INFORMATION; INFECTION; BEHAVIOR; FLU;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0109583
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Google Trends is a novel, freely accessible tool that allows users to interact with Internet search data, which may provide deep insights into population behavior and health-related phenomena. However, there is limited knowledge about its potential uses and limitations. We therefore systematically reviewed health care literature using Google Trends to classify articles by topic and study aim; evaluate the methodology and validation of the tool; and address limitations for its use in research. Methods and Findings: PRISMA guidelines were followed. Two independent reviewers systematically identified studies utilizing Google Trends for health care research from MEDLINE and PubMed. Seventy studies met our inclusion criteria. Google Trends publications increased seven-fold from 2009 to 2013. Studies were classified into four topic domains: infectious disease (27% of articles), mental health and substance use (24%), other non-communicable diseases (16%), and general population behavior (33%). By use, 27% of articles utilized Google Trends for casual inference, 39% for description, and 34% for surveillance. Among surveillance studies, 92% were validated against a reference standard data source, and 80% of studies using correlation had a correlation statistic >= 0.70. Overall, 67% of articles provided a rationale for their search input. However, only 7% of articles were reproducible based on complete documentation of search strategy. We present a checklist to facilitate appropriate methodological documentation for future studies. A limitation of the study is the challenge of classifying heterogeneous studies utilizing a novel data source. Conclusion: Google Trends is being used to study health phenomena in a variety of topic domains in myriad ways. However, poor documentation of methods precludes the reproducibility of the findings. Such documentation would enable other researchers to determine the consistency of results provided by Google Trends for a well-specified query over time. Furthermore, greater transparency can improve its reliability as a research tool.
引用
收藏
页数:49
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Google Trends in tourism and hospitality research: a systematic literature review
    Dinis, Gorete
    Breda, Zelia
    Costa, Carlos
    Pacheco, Osvaldo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 10 (04) : 747 - 763
  • [2] Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review
    Mavragani, Amaryllis
    Ochoa, Gabriela
    Tsagarakis, Konstantinos P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2018, 20 (11)
  • [3] Systematic review of the use of Google Street View in health research: Major themes, strengths, weaknesses and possibilities for future research
    Rzotkiewicz, Amanda
    Pearson, Amber L.
    Dougherty, Benjamin V.
    Shortridge, Ashton
    Wilson, Nick
    [J]. HEALTH & PLACE, 2018, 52 : 240 - 246
  • [4] A systematic review on the use of action research methods in mental health nursing care
    Moreno-Poyato, Antonio R.
    Subias-Miquel, Marti
    Tolosa-Merlos, Diana
    Ventosa-Ruiz, Ana
    Perez-Toribio, Alonso
    El Abidi, Kadhija
    Navarro-Maldonado, Raquel
    Suarez-Perez, Raquel
    Valera-Fernandez, Rosario
    Romeu-Labayen, Maria
    Lluch-Canut, Teresa
    Roldan-Merino, Juan
    Puig-Llobet, Montserrat
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2023, 79 (01) : 372 - 384
  • [5] A systematic review of research on empathy in health care
    Nembhard, Ingrid M.
    David, Guy
    Ezzeddine, Iman
    Betts, David
    Radin, Jennifer
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2023, 58 (02) : 250 - 263
  • [6] Google Trends: Opportunities and limitations in health and health policy research
    Arora, Vishal S.
    McKee, Martin
    Stuckler, David
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 2019, 123 (03) : 338 - 341
  • [8] Evaluating Google trends as a primary care research tool
    Fitzgerald, Maisie
    Saunders, Catherine
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2023, 73
  • [9] Managerial leadership for research use in nursing and allied health care professions: a systematic review
    Gifford, Wendy A.
    Squires, Janet E.
    Angus, Douglas E.
    Ashley, Lisa A.
    Brosseau, Lucie
    Craik, Janet M.
    Domecq, Marie-Cecile
    Egan, Mary
    Holyoke, Paul
    Juergensen, Linda
    Wallin, Lars
    Wazni, Liquaa
    Graham, Ian D.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2018, 13
  • [10] Managerial leadership for research use in nursing and allied health care professions: a systematic review
    Wendy A. Gifford
    Janet E. Squires
    Douglas E. Angus
    Lisa A. Ashley
    Lucie Brosseau
    Janet M. Craik
    Marie-Cécile Domecq
    Mary Egan
    Paul Holyoke
    Linda Juergensen
    Lars Wallin
    Liquaa Wazni
    Ian D. Graham
    [J]. Implementation Science, 13