Activation of ATM and Chk2 kinases in relation to the amount of DNA strand breaks

被引:93
|
作者
Buscemi, G
Perego, P
Carenini, N
Nakanishi, M
Chessa, L
Chen, JJ
Khanna, K
Delia, D
机构
[1] Ist Nazl Tumori, Dept Expt Oncol, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Nagoya City Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biochem, Mizuho Ku, Nagoya, Aichi 4678601, Japan
[3] Osped S Andrea, I-00189 Rome, Italy
[4] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Dept Oncol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[5] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Dept Pediat, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[6] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Dept Adolescent Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[7] Queensland Inst Med Res, Mol & Cellular Biol Div, Brisbane, Qld 4006, Australia
关键词
ATM; Chk2; DNA double-strand breaks; checkpoints;
D O I
10.1038/sj.onc.1207986
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The diverse checkpoint responses to DNA damage may reflect differential sensitivities by molecular components of the damage-signalling network to the type and amount of lesions. Here, we determined the kinetics of activation of the checkpoint kinases ATM and Chk2 ( the latter substrate of ATM) in relation to the initial yield of genomic DNA single-strand (SSBs) and double-strand breaks (DSBs). We show that doses of gamma-radiation (IR) as low as 0.25 Gy, which generate vast numbers of SSBs but only a few DSBs per cell (<8), promptly activate ATM kinase and induce the phosphorylation of the ATM substrates p53 - Ser15, Nbs1 - Ser343 and Chk2 - Thr68. The full activation of Chk2 kinase, however, is triggered by treatments inflicting >19 DSBs per cell (e.g. 1 Gy), which cause Chk2 autophosphorylation on Thr387, Chk2-dependent accumulation of p21(waf1) and checkpoint arrest in the S phase. Our results indicate that, in contrast to ATM, Chk2 activity is triggered by a greater number of DSBs, implying that, below a certain threshold level of lesions (<19 DSBs), DNA repair can occur through ATM, without enforcing Chk2-dependent checkpoints.
引用
收藏
页码:7691 / 7700
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Polo-like kinases and Chk2 at the interface of DNA damage checkpoint pathways and mitotic regulation
    Tsvetkov, L
    IUBMB LIFE, 2004, 56 (08) : 449 - 456
  • [32] Alantolactone Induced Apoptosis and DNA Damage of Cervical Cancer through ATM/CHK2 Signaling Pathway
    Zhang, Yan
    Li, Heyue
    Wei, Yunfang
    Li, Linxia
    BIOLOGICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL BULLETIN, 2024, 47 (07) : 1255 - 1264
  • [33] Differential mode of regulation of the checkpoint kinases CHK1 and CHK2 by their regulatory domains
    Ng, CP
    Lee, HC
    Ho, CW
    Arooz, T
    Siu, WY
    Lau, A
    Poon, RYC
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 279 (10) : 8808 - 8819
  • [34] Linkage of ATM to cell cycle regulation by the Chk2 protein kinase
    Matsuoka, S
    Huang, MX
    Elledge, SJ
    SCIENCE, 1998, 282 (5395) : 1893 - 1897
  • [35] Nuclear retention of ATM at sites of DNA double strand breaks
    Andegeko, Y
    Moyal, L
    Mittelman, L
    Tsarfaty, I
    Shiloh, Y
    Rotman, G
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2001, 276 (41) : 38224 - 38230
  • [36] Inhibition of the G2 DNA damage checkpoint and of protein kinases Chk1 and Chk2 by the marine sponge alkaloid debromohymenialdisine
    Curman, D
    Cinel, B
    Williams, DE
    Rundle, N
    Block, WD
    Goodarzi, AA
    Hutchins, JR
    Clarke, PR
    Zhou, BB
    Lees-Miller, SP
    Andersen, RJ
    Roberge, M
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2001, 276 (21) : 17914 - 17919
  • [37] Depletion of CHK1, but not CHK2, induces chromosomal instability and breaks at common fragile sites
    S G Durkin
    M F Arlt
    N G Howlett
    T W Glover
    Oncogene, 2006, 25 : 4381 - 4388
  • [38] CHK2 kinase in the DNA damage response and beyond
    Zannini, Laura
    Delia, Domenico
    Buscemi, Giacomo
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY, 2014, 6 (06) : 442 - 457
  • [39] Chk2 activation and phosphorylation-dependent oligomerization
    Xu, XZ
    Tsvetkov, LA
    Stern, DF
    MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY, 2002, 22 (12) : 4419 - 4432
  • [40] DNA damage regulates Chk2 association with chromatin
    Li, J
    Stern, DF
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 280 (45) : 37948 - 37956