Walking speed estimation using foot-mounted inertial sensors: Comparing machine learning and strap-down integration methods

被引:50
|
作者
Mannini, Andrea [1 ]
Sabatini, Angelo Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] BioRobot Inst, Scuola Super St Anna, Pisa, Italy
关键词
Inertial sensing; Walking speed estimation; Hidden Markov models; Strap down integration; SPATIOTEMPORAL PARAMETERS; TRIAXIAL ACCELEROMETER; GAIT PARAMETERS; RECOGNITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.07.022
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
In this paper we implemented machine learning (ML) and strap-down integration (SDI) methods and analyzed them for their capability of estimating stride-by-stride walking speed. Walking speed was computed by dividing estimated stride length by stride time using data from a foot mounted inertial measurement unit. In SDI methods stride-by-stride walking speed estimation was driven by detecting gait events using a hidden Markov model (HMM) based method (HMM-based SDI); alternatively, a threshold-based gait event detector was investigated (threshold-based SDI). In the ML method a linear regression model was developed for stride length estimation. Whereas the gait event detectors were a priori fixed without training, the regression model was validated with leave-one-subject-out cross-validation. A subject-specific regression model calibration was also implemented to personalize the ML method. Healthy adults performed over-ground walking trials at natural, slower-than-natural and faster-than-natural speeds. The ML method achieved a root mean square estimation error of 2.0% and 4.2%, with and without personalization, against 2.0% and 3.1% by HMM-based SDI and threshold-based SDI. In spite that the results achieved by the two approaches were similar, the ML method, as compared with SDI methods, presented lower intra-subject variability and higher inter-subject variability, which was reduced by personalization. (C) 2014 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1312 / 1321
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [41] Characterizing Bodyweight-Supported Treadmill Walking on Land and Underwater Using Foot-Worn Inertial Measurement Units and Machine Learning for Gait Event Detection
    Song, Seongmi
    Fernandes, Nathaniel J.
    Nordin, Andrew D.
    SENSORS, 2023, 23 (18)
  • [42] Comparing ANN, SVM, and HMM based Machine Learning Methods for American Sign Language Recognition using Wearable Motion Sensors
    Fatmi, Rabeet
    Rashad, Sherif
    Integlia, Ryan
    2019 IEEE 9TH ANNUAL COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATION WORKSHOP AND CONFERENCE (CCWC), 2019, : 290 - 297
  • [43] Building effective machine learning models for ankle joint power estimation during walking using FMG sensors (vol 16, 836779, 2022)
    Frontiers Prod Off
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROROBOTICS, 2023, 17
  • [44] Parkinson's disease detection from 20-step walking tests using inertial sensors of a smartphone: Machine learning approach based on an observational case-control study
    Juutinen, Milla
    Wang, Cassia
    Zhu, Justin
    Haladjian, Juan
    Ruokolainen, Jari
    Puustinen, Juha
    Vehkaoja, Antti
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (07):