Oral rapamycin to inhibit restenosis after stenting of de novo coronary lesions - The Oral Rapamune to Inhibit Restenosis (ORBIT) Study

被引:66
|
作者
Waksman, R
Ajani, AE
Pichard, AD
Torguson, R
Pinnow, E
Carlos, D
Satler, LF
Kent, KM
Kuchulakanti, P
Pappas, C
Gambone, L
Weissman, N
Abbott, MC
Lindsay, J
机构
[1] Washington Hosp Ctr, Cardiovasc Res Inst, Washington, DC USA
[2] Monash Univ, Royal Melbourne Hosp, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, NHMRC, Ctr Clin Res Excellence Therapeut, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.069
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to establish safety and feasibility of oral Rapamycin at two doses-2 mg and 5 mg-in achieving low rates of repeat target lesion revascularization (TLR) in de novo native coronary artery lesions. BACKGROUND Drug-eluting stents have shown the ability to limit restenosis. Oral Rapamycin is an alternative strategy that can target multiple coronary lesions suitable for treatment with any approved metal stent and at potentially lower cost. METHODS The Oral Rapamune to Inhibit Restenosis (ORBIT) study is an open-label study of 60 patients with de novo lesions treated with bare metal stents in up to two vessels. After a loading dose of 5 mg, patients received a daily dose of 2 mg (n = 30) and 5 mg (n = 30) for 30 days. Six-month angiographic, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), and clinical follow-up were conducted. RESULTS Baseline clinical and procedural characteristics were similar: 10% of patients in the 2-mg group and 30% in the 5-mg group did not complete the course; 43% in the 2-mg group and 66% in the 5-mg group had side effects. At six-month follow-up, late loss (0.6 +/- 0.5 mm vs. 0.7 +/- 0.5 mm; p = NS), in-stent binary restenosis (7.1% vs. 6.9%; p = NS), in-stent percent volume obstruction by IVUS (29% vs. 24%; p = NS), and clinically driven TLR (14.3% vs. 6.9%; p = NS) were similar in 2-mg and 5-mg groups. CONCLUSIONS Oral Rapamycin for the prevention of restenosis is safe, feasible, and associated with low rates of repeat revascularization. Although associated with certain side effects, it may be considered for patients undergoing multivessel. stents if proven in larger randomized studies. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1386-92) (C) 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1386 / 1392
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Systematic Review of Effectiveness of Oral Sirolimus After Bare-Metal Stenting of Coronary Arteries for Prevention of In-Stent Restenosis
    Dasari, Tarun W.
    Patel, Bhavin
    Saucedo, Jorge F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 112 (09): : 1322 - 1327
  • [42] Dose response study of oral rapamycin in prevention of angiographic restenosis: results of ORAR pilot trial
    Rodriguez, A
    Alemparte, MR
    Pereira, CF
    Vigo, C
    Llaurado, C
    Granillo, AR
    Guiroy, J
    Mieres, J
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2004, 25 : 241 - 242
  • [43] Insulin sensitivity and nitric oxide release during oral glucose tolerance test are strong predictors of restenosis after coronary stenting
    Sgura, F
    Piatti, PM
    Setola, E
    Monti, LD
    Messa, M
    Caumo, A
    Colombo, A
    Di Mario, C
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 23 : 557 - 557
  • [44] Histologic evidence of foreign body granulation tissue and de novo lesions in patients with coronary stent restenosis
    Yutani, C
    Ishibashi-Ueda, H
    Suzuki, T
    Kojima, A
    CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 92 (03) : 171 - 177
  • [45] Simvastatin does not inhibit intimal hyperplasia and restenosis but promotes plaque regression in normocholesterolemic patients undergoing coronary stenting: A randomized study with intravascular ultrasound
    Petronio, AS
    Amoroso, G
    Limbruno, U
    Papini, B
    De Carlo, M
    Micheli, A
    Ciabatti, N
    Mariani, M
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2005, 149 (03) : 520 - 526
  • [46] Comparison of clinical outcomes between percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions versus in-stent restenosis lesions
    Mitsuhiro Takeuchi
    Tomotaka Dohi
    Tatsuya Fukase
    Ryota Nishio
    Norihito Takahashi
    Hirohisa Endo
    Shinichiro Doi
    Yoshiteru Kato
    Iwao Okai
    Hiroshi Iwata
    Shinya Okazaki
    Kikuo Isoda
    Katsumi Miyauchi
    Tohru Minamino
    Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics, 2022, 37 : 324 - 332
  • [47] Comparison of clinical outcomes between percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions versus in-stent restenosis lesions
    Takeuchi, Mitsuhiro
    Dohi, Tomotaka
    Fukase, Tatsuya
    Nishio, Ryota
    Takahashi, Norihito
    Endo, Hirohisa
    Doi, Shinichiro
    Kato, Yoshiteru
    Okai, Iwao
    Iwata, Hiroshi
    Okazaki, Shinya
    Isoda, Kikuo
    Miyauchi, Katsumi
    Minamino, Tohru
    CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTION AND THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 37 (02) : 324 - 332
  • [48] Long-term clinical outcomes after intravascular brachytherapy for instent restenosis and de novo coronary artery lesions in percutaneous coronary intervention
    Ho, Hee Hwa
    Kwok, On Hing
    Jim, Man Hong
    Siu, Chung Wah
    Pong, Vincent
    Chow, Wing Hing
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2011, 12 (03) : 152 - 157
  • [49] Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oral sirolimus for restenosis prevention in patients with in-stent restenosis -: The oral sirolimus to inhibit recurrent in-stent stenosis (OSIRIS) trial
    Hausleiter, J
    Kastrati, A
    Mehilli, J
    Vogeser, M
    Zohlnhöfer, D
    Schühlen, H
    Goos, C
    Pache, J
    Dotzer, F
    Pogatsa-Murray, G
    Dirschinger, J
    Heemann, U
    Schömig, A
    CIRCULATION, 2004, 110 (07) : 790 - 795
  • [50] Comparison of Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for De Novo and In-Stent Restenosis Indications
    Jakobsen, Lars
    Christiansen, Evald H.
    Freeman, Phillip
    Kahlert, Johnny
    Veien, Karsten
    Maeng, Michael
    Ellert, Julia
    Kristensen, Steen D.
    Christensen, Martin K.
    Terkelsen, Christian J.
    Thim, Troels
    Lassen, Jens Flensted
    Hougaard, Mikkel
    Eftekhari, Ashkan
    Jensen, Rebekka V.
    Stottrup, Nicolaj B.
    Rasmussen, Jeppe G.
    Junker, Anders
    Jensen, Lisette O.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2025, 235 : 1 - 8