A permutation-based non-parametric analysis of CRISPR screen data

被引:21
|
作者
Jia, Gaoxiang [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Xinlei [1 ]
Xiao, Guanghua [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Southern Methodist Univ, Dept Stat Sci, Dallas, TX 75205 USA
[2] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Clin Sci, Quantitat Biomed Res Ctr, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[3] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Bioinformat, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[4] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Simmons Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
来源
BMC GENOMICS | 2017年 / 18卷
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Functional genomics; False discovery rate; RNA interference; Negative selection; Next generation sequencing; Positive selection; IDENTIFYING DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSION; FALSE DISCOVERY RATE; ESSENTIAL GENES; OFF-TARGET; IDENTIFICATION; METAANALYSIS; SELECTION; TOOL;
D O I
10.1186/s12864-017-3938-5
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: Clustered regularly-interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) screens are usually implemented in cultured cells to identify genes with critical functions. Although several methods have been developed or adapted to analyze CRISPR screening data, no single specific algorithm has gained popularity. Thus, rigorous procedures are needed to overcome the shortcomings of existing algorithms. Methods: We developed a Permutation-Based Non-Parametric Analysis (PBNPA) algorithm, which computes p-values at the gene level by permuting sgRNA labels, and thus it avoids restrictive distributional assumptions. Although PBNPA is designed to analyze CRISPR data, it can also be applied to analyze genetic screens implemented with siRNAs or shRNAs and drug screens. Results: We compared the performance of PBNPA with competing methods on simulated data as well as on real data. PBNPA outperformed recent methods designed for CRISPR screen analysis, as well as methods used for analyzing other functional genomics screens, in terms of Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves and False Discovery Rate (FDR) control for simulated data under various settings. Remarkably, the PBNPA algorithm showed better consistency and FDR control on published real data as well. Conclusions: PBNPA yields more consistent and reliable results than its competitors, especially when the data quality is low. R package of PBNPA is available at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/PBNPA/.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Non-parametric Criteria of Chaotic Data Analysis in Oil Production
    Salavatov, T. Sh
    Abbasov, A. A.
    Malikov, H. Kh
    Guseynova, D. F.
    Suleymanov, A. A.
    [J]. 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THEORY AND APPLICATION OF FUZZY SYSTEMS AND SOFT COMPUTING - ICAFS-2018, 2019, 896 : 491 - 498
  • [32] Non-parametric seismic hazard analysis in the presence of incomplete data
    Azad Yazdani
    Sajjad Mirzaei
    Koroush Dadkhah
    [J]. Journal of Seismology, 2017, 21 : 181 - 192
  • [33] Parametric and non-parametric unsupervised cluster analysis
    Roberts, SJ
    [J]. PATTERN RECOGNITION, 1997, 30 (02) : 261 - 272
  • [35] A studentized permutation test for the non-parametric Behrens-Fisher problem
    Neubert, Karin
    Brunner, Edgar
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2007, 51 (10) : 5192 - 5204
  • [36] A non-parametric permutation method for assessing agreement for distance matrix observations
    Roislien, Jo
    Samset, Eigil
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 33 (02) : 319 - 329
  • [37] A Statistical Non-Parametric data analysis for COVID-19 incidence data
    Minu, R.I.
    Nagarajan, G.
    [J]. ISA Transactions, 2022, 130 : 675 - 683
  • [38] Ophthalmic statistics note 9: parametric versus non-parametric methods for data analysis
    Skene, Simon S.
    Bunce, Catey
    Freemantle, Nick
    Dore, Caroline J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 100 (07) : 877 - 878
  • [39] A Statistical Non-Parametric data analysis for COVID-19 incidence data
    Minu, R. I.
    Nagarajan, G.
    [J]. ISA TRANSACTIONS, 2022, 130 : 675 - 683
  • [40] Parametric and Non-Parametric Stochastic Anomaly Detection in Analysis of Eye-Tracking Data
    Jansson, Daniel
    Medvedev, Alexander
    [J]. 2013 IEEE 52ND ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2013, : 2532 - 2537