Restoration of RPGR expression in vivo using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing

被引:24
|
作者
Gumerson, Jessica D. [1 ]
Alsufyani, Amal [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yu, Wenhan [4 ]
Lei, Jingqi [5 ]
Sun, Xun [1 ]
Dong, Lijin [5 ]
Wu, Zhijian [4 ]
Li, Tiansen [1 ]
机构
[1] NEI, Neurobiol Neurodegenerat & Repair Lab N NRL, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] King Saud Bin Abdulaziz Univ Hlth Sci, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[3] Montgomery Coll, Rockville, MD USA
[4] NEI, Ocular Gene Therapy Core, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[5] NEI, Genet Engn Core, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
LINKED RETINITIS-PIGMENTOSA; RETINAL DYSTROPHY; THERAPY; MOUSE; MUTATIONS; STABILITY; TRANSPORT; EFFICACY; PATIENT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1038/s41434-021-00258-6
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Mutations in the gene for Retinitis Pigmentosa GTPase Regulator (RPGR) cause the X-linked form of inherited retinal degeneration, and the majority are frameshift mutations in a highly repetitive, purine-rich region of RPGR known as the OFR15 exon. Truncation of the reading frame in this terminal exon ablates the functionally important C-terminal domain. We hypothesized that targeted excision in ORF15 by CRISPR/Cas9 and the ensuing repair by non-homologous end joining could restore RPGR reading frame in a portion of mutant photoreceptors thereby correcting gene function in vivo. We tested this hypothesis in the rd9 mouse, a naturally occurring mutant line that carries a frameshift mutation in RPGR(ORF15), through a combination of germline and somatic gene therapy approaches. In germline gene-edited rd9 mice, probing with RPGR domain-specific antibodies demonstrated expression of full length RPGR(ORF15) protein. Hallmark features of RPGR mutation-associated early disease phenotypes, such as mislocalization of cone opsins, were no longer present. Subretinal injections of the same guide RNA (sgRNA) carried in AAV sgRNA and SpCas9 expression vectors restored reading frame of RPGR(ORF15) in a subpopulation of cells with broad distribution throughout the retina, confirming successful correction of the mutation. These data suggest that a simplified form of genome editing mediated by CRISPR, as described here, could be further developed to repair RPGR(ORF15) mutations in vivo.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 93
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An efficient sorghum protoplast assay for transient gene expression and gene editing by CRISPR/Cas9
    Meng, Ruirui
    Wang, Chenchen
    Wang, Lihua
    Liu, Yanlong
    Zhan, Qiuwen
    Zheng, Jiacheng
    Li, Jieqin
    PEERJ, 2020, 8
  • [42] AAV-CRISPR/Cas9 Mediated Gene Editing in Patient RPGR hiPSC-Derived Retinal Organoids
    McDonald, Andrew
    Thanh Nguyen
    Boon, Camiel
    Wijnholds, Jan
    MOLECULAR THERAPY, 2023, 31 (04) : 493 - 494
  • [43] Response to “Unexpected mutations after CRISPR–Cas9 editing in vivo”
    Reynald M Lescarbeau
    Bradley Murray
    Thomas M Barnes
    Nessan Bermingham
    Nature Methods, 2018, 15 (4) : 237 - 237
  • [44] In vivo genome editing of mucopolysaccharidosis I mice using the CRISPR/Cas9 system
    Schuh, Roselena Silvestri
    Poletto, Edina
    Pasqualim, Gabriela
    Vicente Tavares, Angela Maria
    Meyer, Fabiola Shons
    Gonzalez, Esteban Alberto
    Giugliani, Roberto
    Matte, Ursula
    Teixeira, Helder Ferreira
    Baldo, Guilherme
    JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE, 2018, 288 : 23 - 33
  • [45] AN IN VIVO TRACEABLE AND MULTIPLEXING CRISPR/CAS9 GENOME EDITING SYSTEM
    Cheng, L.
    Niu, T.
    Liu, Y.
    HAEMATOLOGICA, 2017, 102 : 568 - 568
  • [46] Response to “Unexpected mutations after CRISPR–Cas9 editing in vivo”
    Lauryl M J Nutter
    Jason D Heaney
    K C Kent Lloyd
    Stephen A Murray
    John R Seavitt
    William C Skarnes
    Lydia Teboul
    Steve D M Brown
    Mark Moore
    Nature Methods, 2018, 15 (4) : 235 - 236
  • [47] Response to “Unexpected mutations after CRISPR–Cas9 editing in vivo”
    Sang-Tae Kim
    Jeongbin Park
    Daesik Kim
    Kyoungmi Kim
    Sangsu Bae
    Matthias Schlesner
    Jin-Soo Kim
    Nature Methods, 2018, 15 (4) : 239 - 240
  • [48] CRISPR/Cas9 Editing of the Mutant Huntingtin Allele In Vitro and In Vivo
    Monteys, Alex Mas
    Ebanks, Shauna A.
    Keiser, Megan S.
    Davidson, Beverly L.
    MOLECULAR THERAPY, 2017, 25 (01) : 12 - 23
  • [49] Response to “Unexpected mutations after CRISPR–Cas9 editing in vivo”
    Caleb A Lareau
    Kendell Clement
    Jonathan Y Hsu
    Vikram Pattanayak
    J Keith Joung
    Martin J Aryee
    Luca Pinello
    Nature Methods, 2018, 15 (4) : 238 - 239
  • [50] Response to “Unexpected mutations after CRISPR–Cas9 editing in vivo”
    Christopher J Wilson
    Tim Fennell
    Anne Bothmer
    Morgan L Maeder
    Deepak Reyon
    Cecilia Cotta-Ramusino
    Cecilia A Fernandez
    Eugenio Marco
    Luis A Barrera
    Hariharan Jayaram
    Charles F Albright
    Gerald F Cox
    George M Church
    Vic E Myer
    Nature Methods, 2018, 15 (4) : 236 - 237