An Exploratory Study of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Individuals With Chronic Stroke Aphasia

被引:16
|
作者
DeMarco, Andrew T. [1 ,2 ]
Dvorak, Elizabeth [1 ]
Lacey, Elizabeth [2 ,3 ]
Stoodley, Catherine J. [4 ]
Turkeltaub, Peter E. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Dept Rehabil Med, Washington, DC USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Dept Neurol, Washington, DC USA
[3] MedStar Natl Rehabil Hosp, Washington, DC USA
[4] Amer Univ, Dept Neurosci, Washington, DC 20016 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
aphasia; neuromodulation; cerebellum; tDCS; LEFT-HEMISPHERE REGIONS; RECOVERY; THERAPY; ANOMIA;
D O I
10.1097/WNN.0000000000000270
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background: Aphasia is a common, debilitating consequence of stroke, and speech therapy is often inadequate to achieve a satisfactory outcome. Neuromodulation techniques have emerged as a potential augmentative treatment for improving aphasia outcomes. Most studies have targeted the cerebrum, but there are theoretical and practical reasons that stimulation over the cerebral hemispheres might not be ideal. On the other hand, the right cerebellum is functionally and anatomically linked to major language areas in the left hemisphere, making it a promising alternative target site for stimulation. Objective: To provide preliminary effect sizes for the ability of a short course of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeted over the right cerebellum to enhance language processing in individuals with chronic poststroke aphasia. Method: Ten individuals received five sessions of open-label anodal tDCS targeting the right cerebellum. The effects of the tDCS were compared with the effects of sham tDCS on 14 controls from a previous clinical trial. In total, 24 individuals with chronic poststroke aphasia participated in the study. Behavioral testing was conducted before treatment, immediately following treatment, and at the 3-month follow-up. Results: Cerebellar tDCS did not significantly enhance language processing measured either immediately following treatment or at the 3-month follow-up. The effect sizes of tDCS over sham treatment were generally nil or small, except for the mean length of utterance on the picture description task, for which medium to large effects were observed. Conclusion: These results may provide guidance for investigators who are planning larger trials of tDCS for individuals with chronic poststroke aphasia.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 106
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Improved naming after transcranial direct current stimulation in aphasia
    Monti, A.
    Cogiamanian, F.
    Marceglia, S.
    Ferrucci, R.
    Mameli, F.
    Mrakic-Sposta, S.
    Vergari, M.
    Zago, S.
    Priori, A.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 79 (04): : 451 - 453
  • [42] Transcranial direct current stimulation: a study on naming performance in aphasic individuals
    da Silva, Fabiane Rodrigues
    Machado Goyano Mac-Kay, Ana Paula
    Chao, John ChiiTyng
    dos Santos, Michele Devido
    Gagliadi, Rubens Jose
    CODAS, 2018, 30 (05):
  • [43] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Post-stroke Chronic Aphasia: The Impact of Baseline Severity and Task Specificity in a Pilot Sample
    Norise, Catherine
    Sacchetti, Daniela
    Hamilton, Roy
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 11
  • [44] Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation modulates the effect of cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation on the excitability of spinal reflex
    Matsugi, Akiyoshi
    Okada, Yohei
    NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2020, 150 : 37 - 43
  • [45] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Enhance Training Effectiveness in Chronic Post-Stroke Aphasia: A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol
    Stahl, Benjamin
    Darkow, Robert
    von Podewils, Viola
    Meinzer, Marcus
    Grittner, Ulrike
    Reinhold, Thomas
    Grewe, Tanja
    Breitenstein, Caterina
    Floeel, Agnes
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [46] Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Anodal or cathodal stimulation for chronic stroke - which is better?
    Marquez, J. L.
    Parsons, M.
    Stoginovsky, E.
    Conley, A.
    Lagopolous, J.
    Karyinidis, F.
    CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2014, 37 : 300 - 300
  • [47] Clinical effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation and virtual reality on chronic individuals post-stroke with severe hemiparesis
    Fuentes, M. A.
    Borrego, A.
    Noe, E.
    Llorens, R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2019, 26 : 182 - 182
  • [48] Neural mechanisms underlying perilesional transcranial direct current stimulation in aphasia: a feasibility study
    Ulm, Lena
    McMahon, Katie
    Copland, David
    de Zubicaray, Greig I.
    Meinzer, Marcus
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 9
  • [49] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Post-Stroke Aphasia: The Impact of Baseline Severity and Task Specificity
    Norise, Catherine
    Sacchetti, Daniela
    Hamilton, Roy
    NEUROLOGY, 2017, 88
  • [50] TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION AS A TOOL TO INDUCE LANGUAGE RECOVERY IN PATIENTS WITH POST-STROKE APHASIA
    Ulanov, M. A.
    Shtyrov, Y. Y.
    Stroganova, T. A.
    ZHURNAL VYSSHEI NERVNOI DEYATELNOSTI IMENI I P PAVLOVA, 2018, 68 (06) : 703 - 718