Classical complexity and quantum entanglement

被引:187
|
作者
Gurvits, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
关键词
entanglement; complexity; determinant;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcss.2004.06.003
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Generalizing a decision problem for bipartite perfect matching, Edmonds (J. Res. Natl. Bur. Standards 718(4) (1967) 242) introduced the problem (now known as the Edmonds Problem) of deciding if a given linear subspace of M (N) contains a non-singular matrix, where M (N) stands for the linear space of complex N x N matrices. This problem led to many fundamental developments in matroid theory, etc. Classical matching theory can be defined in terms of matrices with non-negative entries. The notion of Positive operator, central in Quantum Theory, is a natural generalization of matrices with non-negative entries. (Here operator refers to maps from matrices to matrices.) First, we reformulate the Edmonds Problem in terms of completely positive operators, or equivalently, in terms of bipartite density matrices. It turns out that one of the most important cases when Edmonds' problem can be solved in polynomial deterministic time, i.e. an intersection of two geometric matroids, corresponds to unentangled (aka separable) bipartite density matrices. We introduce a very general class (or promise) of linear subspaces of M(N) on which there exists a polynomial deterministic time algorithm to solve Edmonds' problem. The algorithm is a thoroughgoing generalization of algorithms in Linial, Samorodnitsky and Wigderson, Proceedings of the 30th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, ACM, New York, 1998; Gurvits and Yianilos, and its analysis benefits from an operator analog of permanents, so-called Quantum Permanents. Finally, we prove that the weak membership problem for the convex set of separable normalized bipartite density matrices is NP-HARD. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:448 / 484
页数:37
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Entanglement Dynamics and Classical Complexity
    Wang, Jiaozi
    Dietz, Barbara
    Rosa, Dario
    Benenti, Giuliano
    [J]. ENTROPY, 2023, 25 (01)
  • [2] Entanglement: quantum or classical?
    Paneru, Dilip
    Cohen, Eliahu
    Fickler, Robert
    Boyd, Robert W.
    Karimi, Ebrahim
    [J]. REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS, 2020, 83 (06)
  • [3] Quantum entanglement and communication complexity
    Buhrman, H
    Cleve, R
    Van Dam, W
    [J]. SIAM JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2001, 30 (06) : 1829 - 1841
  • [4] Quantum entanglement and classical behaviour
    Molmer, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MODERN OPTICS, 1997, 44 (10) : 1937 - 1956
  • [5] Classical dynamics of quantum entanglement
    Casati, Giulio
    Guarneri, Italo
    Reslen, Jose
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2012, 85 (03):
  • [6] Entanglement and the quantum-to-classical transition
    Ghose, S
    Alsing, PM
    Sanders, BC
    Deutsch, IH
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2005, 72 (01)
  • [7] Quantum Entanglement from Classical Trajectories
    Runeson, Johan E.
    Richardson, Jeremy O.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2021, 127 (25)
  • [8] Classical correlations and entanglement in quantum measurements
    Vedral, V
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2003, 90 (05)
  • [9] Reducing the communication complexity with quantum entanglement
    Xue, P
    Huang, YF
    Zhang, YS
    Li, CF
    Guo, GC
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2001, 64 (03): : 4
  • [10] Algorithmic complexity and entanglement of quantum states
    Mora, CE
    Briegel, HJ
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2005, 95 (20)