Clinical response benefit in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer - Role of gemcitabine

被引:36
|
作者
Carmichael, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, CRC, Acad Unit Clin Oncol, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
关键词
gemcitabine; advanced pancreatic cancer; solid tumour; clinical benefit response;
D O I
10.1159/000201493
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The prognosis for patients with pancreatic cancer remains extremely poor. A minority are surgically resectable, but the remainder suffer problems from locally invasive disease and also metastatic spread. Median survival in these patients approximates 4 months, with limited systemic options. Many chemotherapy drugs have been evaluated in pancreatic cancer End the results have been disappointing. Of the newer agents, gemcitabine shows the greatest promise in this tumour type. Gemcitabine is a novel pyrimidine antagonist with activity in a number of tumour types. Gemcitabine has been evaluated in 3 phase II studies revealing anti-tumour activity, albeit to a modest degree of around 10%. Many objective tumour reductions have been seen, and more importantly improved symptom control is reported by many investigators. In view of these findings a randomized phase III study was performed in the United States comparing gemcitabine with weekly 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy. Patients receiving gemcitabine achieved a higher response rate, improved symptom control and prolonged survival. These results were statistically significant. Despite the statistically significant improvement in objective response rate and survival in these patients, the outcome of systemic treatment in these patients remains extremely poor. These studies raise the question about the appropriate end-points for systemic chemotherapy trials in pancreatic cancer. Despite low objective response rates and survival improvement of approximately 6 weeks, these patients did achieve symptom control and improvements in quality of life (clinical benefit response). Gemcitabine is the first agent to be evaluated in this way and has been shown to be a benefit for approximately a quarter of the patients treated. Single agent gemcitabine could represent the standard on which to develop and evaluate new approaches. We need to improve on these results and one way forward is to look to gemcitabine containing combination chemotherapy regimens. The relative lack of toxicity associated with this drug lends itself to this approach.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 507
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Overcoming negative predictions of microRNA expressions to gemcitabine response with FOLFIRINOX in advanced pancreatic cancer patients
    Schlick, Konstantin
    Hohla, Florian
    Hamacher, Frank
    Hackl, Hubert
    Hufnagl, Clemens
    Markus, Steiner
    Magnes, Teresa
    Gampenrieder, Simon Peter
    Melchardt, Thomas
    Staettner, Stefan
    Hauser-Kronberger, Cornelia
    Greil, Richard
    Rinnerthaler, Gabriel
    FUTURE SCIENCE OA, 2021, 7 (02):
  • [22] The role of second-line chemotherapy after gemcitabine failure in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
    Boeck, Stefan
    Heinemann, Volker
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2008, 4 (01) : 41 - 50
  • [23] Opioid growth factor improves clinical benefit and survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
    Smith, Jill P.
    Bingaman, Sandra I.
    Mauger, David T.
    Harvey, Harold H.
    Demers, Laurence M.
    Zagon, Ian S.
    OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL OF CLINICAL TRIALS, 2010, 2 : 37 - 48
  • [24] Clinical benefit response of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with protracted 5-fluorouracil infusion in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Okusaka T.
    Okada S.
    Ishii H.
    Nakasuka H.
    Nagahama H.
    Yoshimori M.
    Sumi M.
    Tokuuye K.
    Kagami Y.
    Ikeda H.
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1998, 3 (2) : 93 - 97
  • [25] Does a statistically significant survival benefit of erlotinib plus gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer translate into clinical significance and value?
    Miksad, Rebecca A.
    Schnipper, Lowell
    Goldstein, Michael
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (28) : 4506 - 4507
  • [26] Clinical Benefit Response in Pancreatic Cancer Trials Revisited
    Bernhard, Juerg
    Dietrich, Daniel
    Glimelius, Bengt
    Bodoky, Gyoergy
    Scheithauer, Werner
    Herrmann, Richard
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2014, 37 (1-2) : 42 - 48
  • [27] CA 19-9 response as an early indicator of the effectiveness of gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
    Nakai, Yousuke
    Kawabe, Takao
    Isayama, Hiroyuki
    Sasaki, Takashi
    Yagioka, Hiroshi
    Yashima, Yoko
    Kogure, Hirofumi
    Arizumi, Toshihiko
    Togawa, Osamu
    Ito, Yukiko
    Matsubara, Saburo
    Hirano, Kenji
    Sasahira, Naoki
    Tsujino, Takeshi
    Tada, Minoru
    Omata, Masao
    ONCOLOGY, 2008, 75 (1-2) : 120 - 126
  • [28] Effect of genetic polymorphisms on therapeutic response and clinical outcomes in pancreatic cancer patients treated with gemcitabine
    Woo, Hye In
    Kim, Ka-Kyung
    Choi, Hangseok
    Kim, Seonwoo
    Jang, Kee-Taek
    Yi, Jun Ho
    Park, Young Suk
    Park, Joon Oh
    Lee, Soo-Youn
    PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2012, 13 (09) : 1023 - 1035
  • [29] Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with the use of gemcitabine (GEM) as first-line therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: A randomized trial
    Moore, M
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 31A : 547 - 547
  • [30] Nabpaclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer suffering hyperbilirubenemia
    Pelzer, U.
    Wislocka, L.
    Bischoff, S.
    Juehling, A.
    Sinn, M.
    Striefler, J.
    Klein, F.
    Ghadjar, P.
    Bahra, M.
    Doerken, B.
    Riess, H.
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 39 : 260 - 260