Timing-dependent modulation of associative plasticity by general network excitability in the human motor cortex

被引:175
|
作者
Nitsche, Michael A. [1 ]
Roth, Amelie [1 ]
Kuo, Min-Fang [1 ]
Fischer, Anja K. [1 ]
Liebetanz, David [1 ]
Lang, Nicolas [1 ]
Tergau, Frithjof [1 ]
Paulus, Walter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Dept Clin Neurophysiol, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE | 2007年 / 27卷 / 14期
关键词
homeostatic plasticity; paired associative stimulation; tDCS; TMS; motor cortex; human; DIRECT-CURRENT STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; CORTICAL NEUROPLASTICITY; HOMEOSTATIC PLASTICITY; SYNAPTIC PLASTICITY; DC-STIMULATION; CONSOLIDATION; FACILITATION; MECHANISMS; INDUCTION;
D O I
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5348-06.2007
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Associative neuroplasticity, which encompasses the modification of synaptic strength by coactivation of two synaptic inputs, has been linked to learning processes. Because unlimited plasticity destabilizes neuronal networks, homeostatic rules were proposed and experimentally proven that control for the amount and direction of plasticity dependent on background network activity. Accordingly, low background activity would enhance facilitatory plasticity, whereas high background activity would inhibit it. However, the impact of background excitability on associative plasticity has not been studied so far in humans. Facilitatory associative plasticity was induced by paired associative stimulation (PAS) in the human motor cortex, whereas background activity was enhanced or diminished by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). When applied before PAS, excitability-enhancing tDCS also boosted the efficacy of PAS, whereas excitability-diminishing tDCS turned it into inhibition. Thus, previous background activity does not influence associative plasticity homeostatically. When tDCS and PAS were applied simultaneously, now in accordance with homeostatic rules of neuroplasticity, reduced background activity resulted in a prolonged excitability enhancement by PAS, whereas enhanced background activity turned it into inhibition. We conclude that background network activity can influence associative plasticity homeostatically. However, only simultaneous modulation of both parameters is in accordance with homeostatic concepts. These findings might be of importance for the development of plasticity-inducing stimulation protocols supporting information processing in humans.
引用
收藏
页码:3807 / 3812
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Promoting endogenous associative plasticity in human primary motor cortex
    Suppa, Antonio
    Papazachariadis, Odysseas
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2013, 591 (01): : 7 - 8
  • [32] Associative plasticity in intracortical inhibitory circuits in human motor cortex
    Russmann, Heike
    Lamy, Jean-Charles
    Shamim, Ejaz A.
    Meunier, Sabine
    Hallett, Mark
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 120 (06) : 1204 - 1212
  • [33] Associative plasticity in surround inhibition circuits in human motor cortex
    Belvisi, Daniele
    Kassavetis, Panagiotis
    Bologna, Matteo
    Edwards, Mark J.
    Berardelli, Alfredo
    Rothwell, John C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 40 (12) : 3704 - 3710
  • [34] Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation
    Stefan, K
    Kunesch, E
    Cohen, LG
    Benecke, R
    Classen, J
    BRAIN, 2000, 123 : 572 - 584
  • [35] Chimera states induced by spike timing-dependent plasticity in a regular neuronal network
    Yang, Chao
    Santos, Moises S.
    Protachevicz, Paulo R.
    dos Reis, Patricio D. C.
    Iarosz, Kelly C.
    Caldas, Ibere L.
    Batista, Antonio M.
    AIP ADVANCES, 2022, 12 (10)
  • [36] Phasic spike-timing-dependent plasticity of human motor cortex during walking
    Prior, Michelle M.
    Stinear, James W.
    BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 1110 : 150 - 158
  • [37] Concurrently induced plasticity due to convergence of distinct forms of spike timing-dependent plasticity in the developing barrel cortex
    Itami, Chiaki
    Kimura, Fumitaka
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 44 (12) : 2984 - 2990
  • [38] Stimulus timing-dependent plasticity in cortical processing of orientation
    Yao, HS
    Dan, Y
    NEURON, 2001, 32 (02) : 315 - 323
  • [39] Spike timing-dependent plasticity: A Hebbian learning rule
    Caporale, Natalia
    Dan, Yang
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 31 : 25 - 46
  • [40] Astrocyte signalling control of spike timing-dependent plasticity
    Rodriguez-Moreno, A.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY, 2019, 150 : 31 - 32