Does mini-incision donor nephrectomy improve quality of life in living kidney donors?

被引:8
|
作者
Schnitzbauer, Andreas A.
Hornung, Matthias
Seidel, Ulrike
Krueger, Bernd
Kraemer, Bernhard K.
Schlitt, Hans J.
Obed, Aiman
机构
[1] Univ Regensburg, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, D-93042 Regensburg, Germany
[2] Univ Regensburg, Med Ctr, Dept Nephrol, D-8400 Regensburg, Germany
关键词
living donor; mini-incision; retroperitoneal; quality of life;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-0012.2006.00631.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Living kidney donation helps to avoid or reduce the time period of dialysis and on waiting lists in patients requiring a new organ. Mini-incision donor nephrectomy (MIDN) shows to result in better clinical outcome in comparison with traditional open donor nephrectomy (ODN). This study was performed to evaluate the impact of different surgical procedures on the quality of life (QoL) in patients that underwent donor nephrectomy. Methods: The aim of the study was to detect differences in QoL assessed with the Short Form-36 Version 2 (SF-36v2) questionnaire between MIDN (n = 34) and ODN (n = 36). Furthermore, the development of QoL from prior to surgery until one yr afterwards, as well as outcomes of QoL in comparison with norm-based scores was investigated. Results: Sixty-one of 70 patients, which is 87% (MIDN: 86%, ODN: 88%) resent a whole set questionnaires. QoL was similar at all time-points (prior to surgery, one wk, three months and one yr) in both groups. A tendency of better QoL in MIDN (Bodily Pain) after one wk was detectable (p = 0.075). Physical Component Summaries (PCS) significantly decreased from prior to surgery until one wk after surgery (p = 0.001) and improved significantly until three months (MIDN: p = 0.006, ODN: p = 0.001) and also until one yr after surgery (p = 0.002). Mental Component Summaries (MCS) were stable throughout the whole investigated time period. In comparison with norm-based scores, MIDN (p = 0.005) and ODN (p = 0.001) showed significantly higher PCS prior to, lower scores one wk after (p = 0.001), similar scores three months after and better scores (MIDN: p = 0.023, ODN: 0.015) one yr after surgery. Mental Component Scores were similar in both prior to and one wk after surgery. After three months and one yr scores were significantly better in MIDN (three months: p = 0.049, one yr: p = 0.037) and ODN (three months: 0.020, one yr: 0.073). Conclusion: Quality of life after living donor nephrectomy is not influenced by the surgical technique. Nevertheless the standardized instrument of the SF-36v2 Health Survey is a useful, practicable and universally interpretable tool to gain and estimate recovery from surgical procedures in the perioperative period and its development thereafter.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 240
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mini-incision right hepatic lobectomy with or without laparoscopic assistance for living donor hepatectomy
    Nagai, Shunji
    Brown, Lloyd
    Yoshida, Atsushi
    Kim, Dean
    Kazimi, Marwan
    Abouljoud, Marwan S.
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 18 (10) : 1188 - 1197
  • [32] Updated Experience of Living Donor Right Hepatectomy Using Mini-Incision Technique.
    Nagai, S.
    Yoshida, A.
    Rizzari, M.
    Collins, K.
    Kim, D.
    Abouljoud, M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 16 : 475 - 475
  • [33] Quality of life after donor nephrectomy - Is better after laparoscopy than the mini incision technique
    Townell, Nick
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7561): : 209 - 210
  • [34] Comparing Robotic Single Incision Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy With Standard Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy in Living Kidney
    Archambault, J.
    Rowe, N.
    Nagdee, I.
    Sener, A.
    Luke, P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 14 : 606 - 606
  • [35] Comparative study of laparoscopic and mini-incision open donor nephrectomy: have we heard the last word in the debate?
    Yadav, Kunal
    Aggarwal, Sandeep
    Guleria, Sandeep
    Kumar, Rajeev
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 30 (03) : 328 - 334
  • [36] Pain and quality of life for living donors after nephrectomy
    Gottschalk, A.
    Goetz, J.
    Zenz, M.
    SCHMERZ, 2009, 23 (05): : 502 - 509
  • [37] Follow-up After Donor Nephrectomy in Living Kidney Donors: How to Manage Living Kidney Donors Postoperatively
    Hori, Shunta
    Tomizawa, Mitsuru
    Inoue, Kuniaki
    Yoneda, Tatsuo
    Nakahama, Tomonori
    Onishi, Kenta
    Morizawa, Yosuke
    Gotoh, Daisuke
    Nakai, Yasushi
    Miyake, Makito
    Torimoto, Kazumasa
    Tanaka, Nobumichi
    Fujimoto, Kiyohide
    IN VIVO, 2024, 38 (04): : 1900 - 1910
  • [38] ROBOTIC VERSUS OPEN MINI INCISION LIVING DONOR NEPHRECTOMY: SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE
    Lee, Seung Duk
    Khan, Aamir
    Sharma, Amit
    Cotterell, Adrian
    Kumaran, Vinay
    Bruno, David
    Levy, Marlon
    Bhati, Chandra
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 104 (09) : S242 - S242
  • [39] Mini open donor nephrectomy in obese donors
    Kessaris, Nicos
    Dosani, Taric
    Mustafa, Nazar
    Papalois, Vassilios
    Hakim, Nadey
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 20 : 251 - 251
  • [40] Robotic Donor Nephrectomy: A Novel Approach to Improve Living Donor Kidney Transplantation
    Shahbazov, R.
    Popovic, A.
    Friedman, D.
    Bandler, I.
    Loerzel, S.
    Heslin, K.
    Duvarai, R. Hod
    Gallay, B.
    Pankewycz, O.
    Laftavi, M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 20 : 958 - 958